细胞回收使用自体输血装置CATSmart®:一项随机对照双中心试验评估两个新的柔性洗涤程序的质量。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-04-02 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1159/000536322
Sven Arends, Michael Thomas, Michael Nosch, Thomas Droll, Denise Zwanziger, Thorsten Brenner, Ali Haddad
{"title":"细胞回收使用自体输血装置CATSmart®:一项随机对照双中心试验评估两个新的柔性洗涤程序的质量。","authors":"Sven Arends, Michael Thomas, Michael Nosch, Thomas Droll, Denise Zwanziger, Thorsten Brenner, Ali Haddad","doi":"10.1159/000536322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of cell salvage and autologous blood transfusion is an important and widespread method of blood conservation during surgeries with expected high blood loss. The continuous autotransfusion device CATSmart<sup>®</sup> (Fresenius Kabi, Germany) contains two new washing programs on the device called Flex wash 3 and Flex wash 5. To the best of our knowledge, there are no published clinical data regarding the performance of the two new washing programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 69 patients undergoing cardiac or orthopedic surgery were included in this randomized, controlled, bicentric trial to validate the red cell separation process and washout quality of Flex wash 3 compared to Flex wash 5. After washing, the primary quality target was to determine hematocrit value, recovery rate, albumin, and total protein elimination rate in the packed red cells (PRCs). The secondary objective was to assess the elimination of heparin by measuring the factor anti-Xa activity by a 1- and 2-stage assay in PRC after washing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the whole cohort of patients, hematocrit was 16.00% [9.15%; 21.30%] (median [Q1; Q3]) in the wound blood and 69.90% [51.10%; 80.90%] in the PRC resulting in a recovery rate of 63.92% [47.06%; 88.13%]. The albumin elimination rate was 98.77% [97.94%; 99.27%], and the total protein elimination rate was 98.85% [97.76%; 99.42%]. The heparin elimination rate was 99.95% [99.90%; 99.97%] in the 1-stage assay and 99.70% [99.41%; 99.87%] in the 2-stage assay. There was no difference between Flex wash 3 and Flex wash 5 washing procedure regarding the recovery rate 63.75% [46.64%; 78.65%] versus 67.89% [47.20%; 92.69%] (<i>p</i> = 0.85), albumin elimination rate 98.74% [97.67%; 99.27%] versus 98.78% [98.10%; 99.28%] (<i>p</i> = 0.97), protein elimination rate 98.79% [97.94%; 99.47%] versus 98.92% [97.58%; 99.42%] (<i>p</i> = 0.88), and anti-Xa elimination rate in the 1-stage assay 99.94% [99.79%; 99.97%] versus 99.95% [99.92%; 99.97%] (<i>p</i> = 0.24) and in 2-stage assay 99.66% [99.20%; 99.86%] versus 99.77% [99.47%; 99.90%] (<i>p</i> = 0.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two new washing procedures, Flex wash 3 and Flex wash 5, enable sufficient and comparable red cell separation and washout quality of albumin, total protein, as well as heparin.</p>","PeriodicalId":23252,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","volume":"51 6","pages":"367-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cell Salvage Using the Autotransfusion Device CATSmart<sup>®</sup>: A Randomized Controlled Bicentric Trial Evaluating the Quality of Two New Flex Wash Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Sven Arends, Michael Thomas, Michael Nosch, Thomas Droll, Denise Zwanziger, Thorsten Brenner, Ali Haddad\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000536322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of cell salvage and autologous blood transfusion is an important and widespread method of blood conservation during surgeries with expected high blood loss. The continuous autotransfusion device CATSmart<sup>®</sup> (Fresenius Kabi, Germany) contains two new washing programs on the device called Flex wash 3 and Flex wash 5. To the best of our knowledge, there are no published clinical data regarding the performance of the two new washing programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 69 patients undergoing cardiac or orthopedic surgery were included in this randomized, controlled, bicentric trial to validate the red cell separation process and washout quality of Flex wash 3 compared to Flex wash 5. After washing, the primary quality target was to determine hematocrit value, recovery rate, albumin, and total protein elimination rate in the packed red cells (PRCs). The secondary objective was to assess the elimination of heparin by measuring the factor anti-Xa activity by a 1- and 2-stage assay in PRC after washing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the whole cohort of patients, hematocrit was 16.00% [9.15%; 21.30%] (median [Q1; Q3]) in the wound blood and 69.90% [51.10%; 80.90%] in the PRC resulting in a recovery rate of 63.92% [47.06%; 88.13%]. The albumin elimination rate was 98.77% [97.94%; 99.27%], and the total protein elimination rate was 98.85% [97.76%; 99.42%]. The heparin elimination rate was 99.95% [99.90%; 99.97%] in the 1-stage assay and 99.70% [99.41%; 99.87%] in the 2-stage assay. There was no difference between Flex wash 3 and Flex wash 5 washing procedure regarding the recovery rate 63.75% [46.64%; 78.65%] versus 67.89% [47.20%; 92.69%] (<i>p</i> = 0.85), albumin elimination rate 98.74% [97.67%; 99.27%] versus 98.78% [98.10%; 99.28%] (<i>p</i> = 0.97), protein elimination rate 98.79% [97.94%; 99.47%] versus 98.92% [97.58%; 99.42%] (<i>p</i> = 0.88), and anti-Xa elimination rate in the 1-stage assay 99.94% [99.79%; 99.97%] versus 99.95% [99.92%; 99.97%] (<i>p</i> = 0.24) and in 2-stage assay 99.66% [99.20%; 99.86%] versus 99.77% [99.47%; 99.90%] (<i>p</i> = 0.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two new washing procedures, Flex wash 3 and Flex wash 5, enable sufficient and comparable red cell separation and washout quality of albumin, total protein, as well as heparin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy\",\"volume\":\"51 6\",\"pages\":\"367-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631003/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536322\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在预期失血较多的手术中,使用细胞保留和自体输血是一种重要而广泛的血液保存方法。连续自体输血设备CATSmart®(Fresenius Kabi,德国)在设备上包含两个新的洗涤程序,称为Flex wash 3和Flex wash 5。据我们所知,目前还没有关于这两种新洗涤程序性能的公开临床数据。方法:共有69例接受心脏或骨科手术的患者被纳入这项随机、对照、双中心试验,以验证Flex wash 3与Flex wash 5相比的红细胞分离过程和洗脱质量。洗涤后,主要质量指标是测定红细胞压积值、回收率、白蛋白和填充红细胞(PRCs)中的总蛋白消除率。次要目的是通过在PRC洗涤后通过1和2阶段测定测量抗xa因子活性来评估肝素的消除。结果:在整个队列患者中,血细胞比容为16.00% [9.15%;21.30%](中位数[Q1;Q3]), 69.90% [51.10%];80.90%],回收率为63.92% [47.06%;88.13%)。白蛋白清除率为98.77% [97.94%;总蛋白清除率为98.85% [97.76%];99.42%)。肝素清除率为99.95% [99.90%;99.97%]和99.70% [99.41%;99.87%]。Flex wash 3和Flex wash 5两种清洗方式的回收率分别为63.75%和46.64%;78.65% vs 67.89% [47.20%;92.69%] (p = 0.85),白蛋白清除率98.74% [97.67%];99.27% vs . 98.78% [98.10%;99.28%] (p = 0.97),蛋白质清除率98.79% [97.94%];99.47% vs . 98.92% [97.58%;99.42%] (p = 0.88),一期法抗xa清除率为99.94% [99.79%;99.97%对99.95% [99.92%;99.97%] (p = 0.24),两阶段试验99.66% [99.20%;99.86% vs . 99.77% [99.47%;99.90%] (p = 0.23)。结论:Flex wash 3和Flex wash 5这两种新的洗涤方法能够充分地分离红细胞,并能保证白蛋白、总蛋白和肝素的洗脱质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cell Salvage Using the Autotransfusion Device CATSmart®: A Randomized Controlled Bicentric Trial Evaluating the Quality of Two New Flex Wash Programs.

Background: The use of cell salvage and autologous blood transfusion is an important and widespread method of blood conservation during surgeries with expected high blood loss. The continuous autotransfusion device CATSmart® (Fresenius Kabi, Germany) contains two new washing programs on the device called Flex wash 3 and Flex wash 5. To the best of our knowledge, there are no published clinical data regarding the performance of the two new washing programs.

Methods: In total, 69 patients undergoing cardiac or orthopedic surgery were included in this randomized, controlled, bicentric trial to validate the red cell separation process and washout quality of Flex wash 3 compared to Flex wash 5. After washing, the primary quality target was to determine hematocrit value, recovery rate, albumin, and total protein elimination rate in the packed red cells (PRCs). The secondary objective was to assess the elimination of heparin by measuring the factor anti-Xa activity by a 1- and 2-stage assay in PRC after washing.

Results: In the whole cohort of patients, hematocrit was 16.00% [9.15%; 21.30%] (median [Q1; Q3]) in the wound blood and 69.90% [51.10%; 80.90%] in the PRC resulting in a recovery rate of 63.92% [47.06%; 88.13%]. The albumin elimination rate was 98.77% [97.94%; 99.27%], and the total protein elimination rate was 98.85% [97.76%; 99.42%]. The heparin elimination rate was 99.95% [99.90%; 99.97%] in the 1-stage assay and 99.70% [99.41%; 99.87%] in the 2-stage assay. There was no difference between Flex wash 3 and Flex wash 5 washing procedure regarding the recovery rate 63.75% [46.64%; 78.65%] versus 67.89% [47.20%; 92.69%] (p = 0.85), albumin elimination rate 98.74% [97.67%; 99.27%] versus 98.78% [98.10%; 99.28%] (p = 0.97), protein elimination rate 98.79% [97.94%; 99.47%] versus 98.92% [97.58%; 99.42%] (p = 0.88), and anti-Xa elimination rate in the 1-stage assay 99.94% [99.79%; 99.97%] versus 99.95% [99.92%; 99.97%] (p = 0.24) and in 2-stage assay 99.66% [99.20%; 99.86%] versus 99.77% [99.47%; 99.90%] (p = 0.23).

Conclusions: The two new washing procedures, Flex wash 3 and Flex wash 5, enable sufficient and comparable red cell separation and washout quality of albumin, total protein, as well as heparin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is devoted to all areas of transfusion medicine. These include the quality and security of blood products, therapy with blood components and plasma derivatives, transfusion-related questions in transplantation, stem cell manipulation, therapeutic and diagnostic problems of homeostasis, immuno-hematological investigations, and legal aspects of the production of blood products as well as hemotherapy. Both comprehensive reviews and primary publications that detail the newest work in transfusion medicine and hemotherapy promote the international exchange of knowledge within these disciplines. Consistent with this goal, continuing clinical education is also specifically addressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信