围手术期抗凝和抗血小板治疗对听力保存结果的影响。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-11 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004394
Connie C Ma, Ankita Patro, Natalie R Schauwecker, Nathan R Lindquist, Michael H Freeman, Elizabeth L Perkins, David S Haynes, Kareem O Tawfik
{"title":"围手术期抗凝和抗血小板治疗对听力保存结果的影响。","authors":"Connie C Ma, Ankita Patro, Natalie R Schauwecker, Nathan R Lindquist, Michael H Freeman, Elizabeth L Perkins, David S Haynes, Kareem O Tawfik","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report hearing preservation (HP) outcomes based on anticoagulation/antiplatelet use (blood thinner, BT) following cochlear implantation (CI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Three hundred twenty-six adults (361 ears: no BT = 210, BT held = 86, BT continued = 65) implanted between 2012 and 2021 with preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) of 65 dB HL or better.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Postoperative HP, defined as LFPTA ≤80 dB HL, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to no BT, the BT held and continued groups were older (60.6 vs 72.7 vs 73.0 yrs, p < 0.001) and had diabetes (10% vs 28% vs 22%, p < 0.001). Electrode type, steroid use, surgical approach, and preoperative LFPTA were equivalent among groups. Postoperative HP rates were significantly higher for no BT than the BT held and continued groups at 1 month (62% vs 48% vs 43%, p = 0.008), with equivalent results at 3, 6, and 12 months. When patients were stratified by BT type, there were no significant differences in HP outcomes. On multivariate analysis, BT status was not a significant predictor of HP rates at 1 or 12 months. Younger age (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.97, p < 0.001) was the only significant predictor of 1- but not 12-month HP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BT use, regardless of whether held for surgery, was associated with inferior early HP outcomes. After controlling for age, BT status was not a significant predictor of HP, suggesting inherently poorer cochlear health in patients who are on BTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"128-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Perioperative Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy on Hearing Preservation Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Connie C Ma, Ankita Patro, Natalie R Schauwecker, Nathan R Lindquist, Michael H Freeman, Elizabeth L Perkins, David S Haynes, Kareem O Tawfik\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report hearing preservation (HP) outcomes based on anticoagulation/antiplatelet use (blood thinner, BT) following cochlear implantation (CI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Three hundred twenty-six adults (361 ears: no BT = 210, BT held = 86, BT continued = 65) implanted between 2012 and 2021 with preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) of 65 dB HL or better.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Postoperative HP, defined as LFPTA ≤80 dB HL, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to no BT, the BT held and continued groups were older (60.6 vs 72.7 vs 73.0 yrs, p < 0.001) and had diabetes (10% vs 28% vs 22%, p < 0.001). Electrode type, steroid use, surgical approach, and preoperative LFPTA were equivalent among groups. Postoperative HP rates were significantly higher for no BT than the BT held and continued groups at 1 month (62% vs 48% vs 43%, p = 0.008), with equivalent results at 3, 6, and 12 months. When patients were stratified by BT type, there were no significant differences in HP outcomes. On multivariate analysis, BT status was not a significant predictor of HP rates at 1 or 12 months. Younger age (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.97, p < 0.001) was the only significant predictor of 1- but not 12-month HP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BT use, regardless of whether held for surgery, was associated with inferior early HP outcomes. After controlling for age, BT status was not a significant predictor of HP, suggesting inherently poorer cochlear health in patients who are on BTs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"128-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004394\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/12/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:报告人工耳蜗植入术(CI)后抗凝/抗血小板(血液稀释剂,BT)使用的听力保护(HP)结果。研究设计:回顾性队列。单位:三级转诊中心。患者:2012年至2021年间,326名成人(361耳:无BT = 210, BT保留= 86,BT持续= 65)植入,术前低频纯音平均(LFPTA)为65 dB HL或更高。主要结局指标:术后HP,定义为LFPTA≤80 dB HL,分别为1、3、6和12个月。结果:与无BT组相比,BT组和持续BT组年龄较大(60.6 vs 72.7 vs 73.0岁,p < 0.001),并患有糖尿病(10% vs 28% vs 22%, p < 0.001)。电极类型、类固醇使用、手术入路和术前LFPTA组间相同。1个月时,无BT组的术后HP率明显高于有BT组和继续BT组(62% vs 48% vs 43%, p = 0.008), 3、6和12个月时的结果相同。当患者按BT类型分层时,HP结局无显著差异。在多变量分析中,BT状态不是1个月或12个月HP发病率的显著预测因子。年龄较小(OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.97, p < 0.001)是1个月而非12个月HP的唯一显著预测因子。结论:使用BT,无论是否用于手术,与早期HP预后较差有关。在控制了年龄之后,BT状态并不是HP的显著预测因子,这表明使用BT的患者的耳蜗健康状况本来就较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Perioperative Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy on Hearing Preservation Outcomes.

Objective: To report hearing preservation (HP) outcomes based on anticoagulation/antiplatelet use (blood thinner, BT) following cochlear implantation (CI).

Study design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: Three hundred twenty-six adults (361 ears: no BT = 210, BT held = 86, BT continued = 65) implanted between 2012 and 2021 with preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) of 65 dB HL or better.

Main outcome measure: Postoperative HP, defined as LFPTA ≤80 dB HL, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results: Compared to no BT, the BT held and continued groups were older (60.6 vs 72.7 vs 73.0 yrs, p < 0.001) and had diabetes (10% vs 28% vs 22%, p < 0.001). Electrode type, steroid use, surgical approach, and preoperative LFPTA were equivalent among groups. Postoperative HP rates were significantly higher for no BT than the BT held and continued groups at 1 month (62% vs 48% vs 43%, p = 0.008), with equivalent results at 3, 6, and 12 months. When patients were stratified by BT type, there were no significant differences in HP outcomes. On multivariate analysis, BT status was not a significant predictor of HP rates at 1 or 12 months. Younger age (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.97, p < 0.001) was the only significant predictor of 1- but not 12-month HP.

Conclusions: BT use, regardless of whether held for surgery, was associated with inferior early HP outcomes. After controlling for age, BT status was not a significant predictor of HP, suggesting inherently poorer cochlear health in patients who are on BTs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信