超声引导热消融与甲状腺切除术治疗良性甲状腺结节:系统评价和Meta分析。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Ruaa Mustafa Qafesha, Muataz Kashbour, Sarah Amro, Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi, Menna Elbadry, Asem Ahmed Ghalwash, Zeinab Alnatsheh, Mahmoud A Y Abdelaziz, Hatem Eldeeb, Ahmad Ramzi Shiha
{"title":"超声引导热消融与甲状腺切除术治疗良性甲状腺结节:系统评价和Meta分析。","authors":"Ruaa Mustafa Qafesha, Muataz Kashbour, Sarah Amro, Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi, Menna Elbadry, Asem Ahmed Ghalwash, Zeinab Alnatsheh, Mahmoud A Y Abdelaziz, Hatem Eldeeb, Ahmad Ramzi Shiha","doi":"10.1002/jum.16630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ultrasound-guided thermal ablation (TA) is a minimally invasive intervention for treating benign thyroid nodules (BTNs). This meta-analysis aims to systematically compare the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided TA with surgery in treating BTNs. Relevant studies were identified through searching electronic databases. Included studies focused on comparing TA for BTNs with surgical resection. Primary endpoints encompassed length of hospital stay, procedure time, symptom improvement, cosmetic score, and excellent cosmetic results. Other outcomes include all complications (hypothyroidism, hoarseness, hematoma, blood loss, wound infection, parathyroid injury, chocking, or cough), recurrence, postoperative pain, visual analog scale (VAS) score, scar length, thyroid hormone levels, and finally stress response outcomes. Twenty-six studies (7 randomized controlled trials and 19 cohort studies) were included. Our findings revealed that TA was associated with shorter hospital stays (MD = -3.30, 95% CI [-3.82, -2.79], P < .00001), reduced procedure time (MD = -47.75, 95% CI [-54.89, -40.61] P < .00001), superior cosmetic outcomes (RR = 1.11, 95% CI [1.00, 1.22], P = .04), lower postoperative pain levels, and lower VAS score. Additionally, surgical resection was linked to a higher incidence of hoarseness, hypothyroidism, parathyroid injury, and blood loss. However, no significant differences were observed in rates of wound infection, hematoma, or recurrence between the two treatment modalities. Our meta-analysis suggests that ultrasound-guided TA represents a viable alternative to surgery for treating BTNs, especially for patients unwilling or unable to undergo surgical intervention. This technique was found to be safe and effective. However, future evidence is mandatory to establish TA to a specific type of nodule, to preserve patients from second interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-Guided Thermal Ablation Versus Thyroidectomy in the Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules: Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ruaa Mustafa Qafesha, Muataz Kashbour, Sarah Amro, Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi, Menna Elbadry, Asem Ahmed Ghalwash, Zeinab Alnatsheh, Mahmoud A Y Abdelaziz, Hatem Eldeeb, Ahmad Ramzi Shiha\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jum.16630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ultrasound-guided thermal ablation (TA) is a minimally invasive intervention for treating benign thyroid nodules (BTNs). This meta-analysis aims to systematically compare the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided TA with surgery in treating BTNs. Relevant studies were identified through searching electronic databases. Included studies focused on comparing TA for BTNs with surgical resection. Primary endpoints encompassed length of hospital stay, procedure time, symptom improvement, cosmetic score, and excellent cosmetic results. Other outcomes include all complications (hypothyroidism, hoarseness, hematoma, blood loss, wound infection, parathyroid injury, chocking, or cough), recurrence, postoperative pain, visual analog scale (VAS) score, scar length, thyroid hormone levels, and finally stress response outcomes. Twenty-six studies (7 randomized controlled trials and 19 cohort studies) were included. Our findings revealed that TA was associated with shorter hospital stays (MD = -3.30, 95% CI [-3.82, -2.79], P < .00001), reduced procedure time (MD = -47.75, 95% CI [-54.89, -40.61] P < .00001), superior cosmetic outcomes (RR = 1.11, 95% CI [1.00, 1.22], P = .04), lower postoperative pain levels, and lower VAS score. Additionally, surgical resection was linked to a higher incidence of hoarseness, hypothyroidism, parathyroid injury, and blood loss. However, no significant differences were observed in rates of wound infection, hematoma, or recurrence between the two treatment modalities. Our meta-analysis suggests that ultrasound-guided TA represents a viable alternative to surgery for treating BTNs, especially for patients unwilling or unable to undergo surgical intervention. This technique was found to be safe and effective. However, future evidence is mandatory to establish TA to a specific type of nodule, to preserve patients from second interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16630\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16630","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

超声引导热消融(TA)是治疗良性甲状腺结节(BTNs)的一种微创介入治疗方法。本荟萃分析旨在系统比较超声引导下TA与手术治疗BTNs的安全性和有效性。通过检索电子数据库确定相关研究。纳入的研究集中于比较TA治疗BTNs与手术切除。主要终点包括住院时间、手术时间、症状改善、美容评分和良好的美容效果。其他结局包括所有并发症(甲状腺功能减退、声音嘶哑、血肿、失血、伤口感染、甲状旁腺损伤、窒息或咳嗽)、复发、术后疼痛、视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、疤痕长度、甲状腺激素水平以及最后的应激反应结局。纳入26项研究(7项随机对照试验和19项队列研究)。我们的研究结果显示,TA与较短的住院时间相关(MD = -3.30, 95% CI [-3.82, -2.79], P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound-Guided Thermal Ablation Versus Thyroidectomy in the Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules: Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.

Ultrasound-guided thermal ablation (TA) is a minimally invasive intervention for treating benign thyroid nodules (BTNs). This meta-analysis aims to systematically compare the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided TA with surgery in treating BTNs. Relevant studies were identified through searching electronic databases. Included studies focused on comparing TA for BTNs with surgical resection. Primary endpoints encompassed length of hospital stay, procedure time, symptom improvement, cosmetic score, and excellent cosmetic results. Other outcomes include all complications (hypothyroidism, hoarseness, hematoma, blood loss, wound infection, parathyroid injury, chocking, or cough), recurrence, postoperative pain, visual analog scale (VAS) score, scar length, thyroid hormone levels, and finally stress response outcomes. Twenty-six studies (7 randomized controlled trials and 19 cohort studies) were included. Our findings revealed that TA was associated with shorter hospital stays (MD = -3.30, 95% CI [-3.82, -2.79], P < .00001), reduced procedure time (MD = -47.75, 95% CI [-54.89, -40.61] P < .00001), superior cosmetic outcomes (RR = 1.11, 95% CI [1.00, 1.22], P = .04), lower postoperative pain levels, and lower VAS score. Additionally, surgical resection was linked to a higher incidence of hoarseness, hypothyroidism, parathyroid injury, and blood loss. However, no significant differences were observed in rates of wound infection, hematoma, or recurrence between the two treatment modalities. Our meta-analysis suggests that ultrasound-guided TA represents a viable alternative to surgery for treating BTNs, especially for patients unwilling or unable to undergo surgical intervention. This technique was found to be safe and effective. However, future evidence is mandatory to establish TA to a specific type of nodule, to preserve patients from second interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信