Ricardo Mora-Rodriguez, Alfonso Moreno-Cabañas, Laura Alvarez-Jimenez, Diego Mora-Gonzalez, Felix Morales-Palomo
{"title":"高强度间歇运动(HIIE)在降低餐后高血糖方面优于等热量中等强度连续运动(MICE)。","authors":"Ricardo Mora-Rodriguez, Alfonso Moreno-Cabañas, Laura Alvarez-Jimenez, Diego Mora-Gonzalez, Felix Morales-Palomo","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We investigated if a bout of high-intensity intervallic exercise (HIIE) is more efficacious at reducing postprandial hyperglycemia than an isocaloric bout of moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen healthy physically active individuals (21% women) completed three trials in a randomized order: i ) HIIE cycling consisting of five bouts of 4 min at 83 ± 9% of subjects' maximal oxygen consumption ( O 2MAX ) with active recoveries at 53 ± 8%, for a total of 50 min; ii ) MICE cycling at 65 ± 8% of O 2max for 50 min; and iii ) CONTROL no exercise. All trials were followed by a standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) ingesting 74 g of glucose traced with 1 g of uniformly labeled [ 13 C]-glucose. Plasma glucose and insulin concentrations, and plasma glucose kinetics ([6,6 2 H 2 ] glucose infusion) were measured before exercise, during exercise, and during the OGTT. Insulin sensitivity was estimated by the Matsuda index (ISI). Energy expenditure and carbohydrate oxidation (CHOxid) were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At rest, blood glucose, insulin concentrations, and CHOxid were similar in all three trials. During exercise, energy expenditure was similar in HIIE versus MICE (548 ± 131 vs 560 ± 125 kcal; P = 0.340). However, CHOxid, plasma glucose concentration, and its rates of appearance in plasma (Ra) were higher in HIIE versus MICE (Ra glucose 34.3 ± 9.8 vs 28.9 ± 6.8 μmol·kg -1 ·min -1 ; P = 0.021). During the OGTT, plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were lower, and insulin sensitivity was higher in HIIE versus CONTROL (ISI MATSUDA ; 12.4 ± 4.7 vs 10.8 ± 4.7 au; P = 0.007). Exercise delayed blood incorporation of [ 13 C]-glucose into blood ( P = 0.023). Early during the OGTT, glucose clearance rates were higher in HIIE versus CONTROL (7.1 ± 3.1 vs 5.5 ± 3.0 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 ; P = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HIIE is more effective than MICE to reduce hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia after glucose ingestion. HIIE improves glycemic control by increasing splanchnic glucose retention and glucose clearance rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":"1019-1031"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-Intensity Intervallic Exercise (HIIE) Is Superior to Isocaloric Moderate-Intensity Continuous Exercise (MICE) at Reducing Postprandial Hyperglycemia.\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Mora-Rodriguez, Alfonso Moreno-Cabañas, Laura Alvarez-Jimenez, Diego Mora-Gonzalez, Felix Morales-Palomo\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We investigated if a bout of high-intensity intervallic exercise (HIIE) is more efficacious at reducing postprandial hyperglycemia than an isocaloric bout of moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen healthy physically active individuals (21% women) completed three trials in a randomized order: i ) HIIE cycling consisting of five bouts of 4 min at 83 ± 9% of subjects' maximal oxygen consumption ( O 2MAX ) with active recoveries at 53 ± 8%, for a total of 50 min; ii ) MICE cycling at 65 ± 8% of O 2max for 50 min; and iii ) CONTROL no exercise. All trials were followed by a standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) ingesting 74 g of glucose traced with 1 g of uniformly labeled [ 13 C]-glucose. Plasma glucose and insulin concentrations, and plasma glucose kinetics ([6,6 2 H 2 ] glucose infusion) were measured before exercise, during exercise, and during the OGTT. Insulin sensitivity was estimated by the Matsuda index (ISI). Energy expenditure and carbohydrate oxidation (CHOxid) were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At rest, blood glucose, insulin concentrations, and CHOxid were similar in all three trials. During exercise, energy expenditure was similar in HIIE versus MICE (548 ± 131 vs 560 ± 125 kcal; P = 0.340). However, CHOxid, plasma glucose concentration, and its rates of appearance in plasma (Ra) were higher in HIIE versus MICE (Ra glucose 34.3 ± 9.8 vs 28.9 ± 6.8 μmol·kg -1 ·min -1 ; P = 0.021). During the OGTT, plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were lower, and insulin sensitivity was higher in HIIE versus CONTROL (ISI MATSUDA ; 12.4 ± 4.7 vs 10.8 ± 4.7 au; P = 0.007). Exercise delayed blood incorporation of [ 13 C]-glucose into blood ( P = 0.023). Early during the OGTT, glucose clearance rates were higher in HIIE versus CONTROL (7.1 ± 3.1 vs 5.5 ± 3.0 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 ; P = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HIIE is more effective than MICE to reduce hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia after glucose ingestion. HIIE improves glycemic control by increasing splanchnic glucose retention and glucose clearance rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1019-1031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003625\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们研究HIIE是否比等热量小鼠更有效地降低餐后高血糖。方法:19名身体活跃的健康个体(21%为女性)按随机顺序完成了3项试验:i) HIIE循环,包括5次,每次4分钟,在受试者最大耗氧量(V˙O2 MAX)的83±9%下,有效回收率为53±8%,总共50分钟;ii)小鼠在65±8% V˙O2 MAX下循环50 min, iii)对照组不运动。所有试验之后都进行了标准的口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT),摄入74克葡萄糖和1克均匀标记的[13C]-葡萄糖。在运动前、运动中和OGTT期间测量血浆葡萄糖和胰岛素浓度以及血浆葡萄糖动力学([6,6 2H2]葡萄糖输注)。胰岛素敏感性采用松田指数(ISI)评估。监测能量消耗和碳水化合物氧化(CHOxid)。结果:在休息时,血糖、胰岛素浓度和CHOxid在所有三个试验中相似。运动时,HIIE和MICE的能量消耗相似(548±131 vs 560±125 kcal);P = 0.340)。然而,HIIE小鼠的CHOxid、血浆葡萄糖浓度及其出现率(Ra)高于小鼠(Ra葡萄糖34.3±9.8 vs 28.9±6.8 μmol·kg-1·min-1;P = 0.021)。在OGTT期间,HIIE患者的血糖和胰岛素浓度较低,胰岛素敏感性高于对照组(ISI MATSUDA;12.4±4.7 vs 10.8±4.7 au;P = 0.007)。运动延迟了[13C]-葡萄糖在血液中的掺入(p = 0.023)。OGTT早期,HIIE组的葡萄糖清除率高于对照组(7.1±3.1 vs 5.5±3.0 mL·kg-1·min-1;P = 0.015)。结论:HIIE对葡萄糖摄入后高血糖和高胰岛素血症的降低效果优于小鼠。HIIE通过增加内脏葡萄糖潴留和葡萄糖清除率来改善血糖控制。
High-Intensity Intervallic Exercise (HIIE) Is Superior to Isocaloric Moderate-Intensity Continuous Exercise (MICE) at Reducing Postprandial Hyperglycemia.
Purpose: We investigated if a bout of high-intensity intervallic exercise (HIIE) is more efficacious at reducing postprandial hyperglycemia than an isocaloric bout of moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE).
Methods: Nineteen healthy physically active individuals (21% women) completed three trials in a randomized order: i ) HIIE cycling consisting of five bouts of 4 min at 83 ± 9% of subjects' maximal oxygen consumption ( O 2MAX ) with active recoveries at 53 ± 8%, for a total of 50 min; ii ) MICE cycling at 65 ± 8% of O 2max for 50 min; and iii ) CONTROL no exercise. All trials were followed by a standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) ingesting 74 g of glucose traced with 1 g of uniformly labeled [ 13 C]-glucose. Plasma glucose and insulin concentrations, and plasma glucose kinetics ([6,6 2 H 2 ] glucose infusion) were measured before exercise, during exercise, and during the OGTT. Insulin sensitivity was estimated by the Matsuda index (ISI). Energy expenditure and carbohydrate oxidation (CHOxid) were monitored.
Results: At rest, blood glucose, insulin concentrations, and CHOxid were similar in all three trials. During exercise, energy expenditure was similar in HIIE versus MICE (548 ± 131 vs 560 ± 125 kcal; P = 0.340). However, CHOxid, plasma glucose concentration, and its rates of appearance in plasma (Ra) were higher in HIIE versus MICE (Ra glucose 34.3 ± 9.8 vs 28.9 ± 6.8 μmol·kg -1 ·min -1 ; P = 0.021). During the OGTT, plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were lower, and insulin sensitivity was higher in HIIE versus CONTROL (ISI MATSUDA ; 12.4 ± 4.7 vs 10.8 ± 4.7 au; P = 0.007). Exercise delayed blood incorporation of [ 13 C]-glucose into blood ( P = 0.023). Early during the OGTT, glucose clearance rates were higher in HIIE versus CONTROL (7.1 ± 3.1 vs 5.5 ± 3.0 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 ; P = 0.015).
Conclusions: HIIE is more effective than MICE to reduce hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia after glucose ingestion. HIIE improves glycemic control by increasing splanchnic glucose retention and glucose clearance rates.
期刊介绍:
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.