训练量增加或维持在先前量的基础上:对训练雄性肌肉适应的影响。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Journal of applied physiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00476.2024
Andrew Barsuhn, Tanuj Wadhi, Alan Murphy, Spencer Zazzo, Baron Thompson, Christopher Barakat, Josh Bradshaw, Joseph Walters, Jody C Andersen, Brad Jon Schoenfeld, Carlos Ugrinowitsch, Eduardo Oliveira De Souza
{"title":"训练量增加或维持在先前量的基础上:对训练雄性肌肉适应的影响。","authors":"Andrew Barsuhn, Tanuj Wadhi, Alan Murphy, Spencer Zazzo, Baron Thompson, Christopher Barakat, Josh Bradshaw, Joseph Walters, Jody C Andersen, Brad Jon Schoenfeld, Carlos Ugrinowitsch, Eduardo Oliveira De Souza","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00476.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the effects of increasing previous resistance training (RT) weekly set volume by 30% (G30) and 60% (G60) on muscle hypertrophy and strength. Fifty-five resistance-trained men were randomly allocated to the experimental groups, whereas 29 completed the study, as follows: control group (CON): <i>n</i> = 10, G30: <i>n</i> = 10, and G60: <i>n</i> = 9. Participants underwent a lower body RT program twice a week for 8 wk. We assessed pre- and poststudy thigh region-of-interest fat-free mass (ROI-FFM), anterior thigh muscle thickness (MT) at two sites: proximal (PMT) and distal (DMT) and their sum (ΣMT), one-repetition maximum (1RM), and strength-endurance via repetitions to failure (RTF) at 70% of 1RM. ROI-FFM and MT demonstrated a significant increase from pre- to posttraining (main time effect, <i>P</i> < 0.001) (ΔΣMT CON: 1.07 cm, G30: 0.76 cm, and G60: 0.70 cm; ΔROI-FFM CON: 1.57 kg, G30: 0.47 kg, and G60: 1.55 kg). All groups increased back squat 1RM (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). However, the main group effect (<i>P</i> < 0.0268) indicated that the CON group showcased a greater overall 1RM (174.7 kg), than the G30 (159.0 kg) and G60 (149.0 kg). Only the G30 group increased RTF at the posttest (CON: 0.13 reps, G30: 5.45 reps, and G60: -0.41 reps) (<i>P</i> < 0.0263). Our findings suggest that trained males can experience significant muscle growth and strength adaptations while maintaining their previous weekly set number above a certain weekly set volume threshold.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Increasing previous resistance training volume by 30% (G30), 60% (G60), or maintenance (CON) on muscular adaptations in trained individuals. Interestingly, CON group resulted in the greatest overall 1RM strength, whereas G30 showed the highest increase in repetitions to failure, with no differences between groups in muscle mass size. These findings suggest that more is not always better for muscle adaptations in a trained cohort, highlighting muscle growth across a wide range of weekly set numbers.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":"259-269"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training volume increases or maintenance based on previous volume: the effects on muscular adaptations in trained males.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Barsuhn, Tanuj Wadhi, Alan Murphy, Spencer Zazzo, Baron Thompson, Christopher Barakat, Josh Bradshaw, Joseph Walters, Jody C Andersen, Brad Jon Schoenfeld, Carlos Ugrinowitsch, Eduardo Oliveira De Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/japplphysiol.00476.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated the effects of increasing previous resistance training (RT) weekly set volume by 30% (G30) and 60% (G60) on muscle hypertrophy and strength. Fifty-five resistance-trained men were randomly allocated to the experimental groups, whereas 29 completed the study, as follows: control group (CON): <i>n</i> = 10, G30: <i>n</i> = 10, and G60: <i>n</i> = 9. Participants underwent a lower body RT program twice a week for 8 wk. We assessed pre- and poststudy thigh region-of-interest fat-free mass (ROI-FFM), anterior thigh muscle thickness (MT) at two sites: proximal (PMT) and distal (DMT) and their sum (ΣMT), one-repetition maximum (1RM), and strength-endurance via repetitions to failure (RTF) at 70% of 1RM. ROI-FFM and MT demonstrated a significant increase from pre- to posttraining (main time effect, <i>P</i> < 0.001) (ΔΣMT CON: 1.07 cm, G30: 0.76 cm, and G60: 0.70 cm; ΔROI-FFM CON: 1.57 kg, G30: 0.47 kg, and G60: 1.55 kg). All groups increased back squat 1RM (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). However, the main group effect (<i>P</i> < 0.0268) indicated that the CON group showcased a greater overall 1RM (174.7 kg), than the G30 (159.0 kg) and G60 (149.0 kg). Only the G30 group increased RTF at the posttest (CON: 0.13 reps, G30: 5.45 reps, and G60: -0.41 reps) (<i>P</i> < 0.0263). Our findings suggest that trained males can experience significant muscle growth and strength adaptations while maintaining their previous weekly set number above a certain weekly set volume threshold.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Increasing previous resistance training volume by 30% (G30), 60% (G60), or maintenance (CON) on muscular adaptations in trained individuals. Interestingly, CON group resulted in the greatest overall 1RM strength, whereas G30 showed the highest increase in repetitions to failure, with no differences between groups in muscle mass size. These findings suggest that more is not always better for muscle adaptations in a trained cohort, highlighting muscle growth across a wide range of weekly set numbers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"259-269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00476.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00476.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了先前阻力训练(RT)每周增加30% (G30)和60% (G60)对肌肉肥大和力量的影响。55名接受阻力训练的男性被随机分配到实验组,29名完成了研究,如下:对照组(CON): n=10, G30: n=10, G60: n=9。参与者每周接受两次下半身放射治疗,持续八周。我们评估了研究前和研究后大腿感兴趣区域无脂肪量(ROI-FFM)、两个部位的大腿前肌厚度(MT):近端(PMT)和远端(DMT)及其总和(ΣMT)、单次重复最大值(1RM)和通过重复到失败(RTF)在70%的1RM时的力量-耐力。从训练前到训练后,ROI-FFM和MT表现出显著的增加(主时间效应,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Training volume increases or maintenance based on previous volume: the effects on muscular adaptations in trained males.

This study investigated the effects of increasing previous resistance training (RT) weekly set volume by 30% (G30) and 60% (G60) on muscle hypertrophy and strength. Fifty-five resistance-trained men were randomly allocated to the experimental groups, whereas 29 completed the study, as follows: control group (CON): n = 10, G30: n = 10, and G60: n = 9. Participants underwent a lower body RT program twice a week for 8 wk. We assessed pre- and poststudy thigh region-of-interest fat-free mass (ROI-FFM), anterior thigh muscle thickness (MT) at two sites: proximal (PMT) and distal (DMT) and their sum (ΣMT), one-repetition maximum (1RM), and strength-endurance via repetitions to failure (RTF) at 70% of 1RM. ROI-FFM and MT demonstrated a significant increase from pre- to posttraining (main time effect, P < 0.001) (ΔΣMT CON: 1.07 cm, G30: 0.76 cm, and G60: 0.70 cm; ΔROI-FFM CON: 1.57 kg, G30: 0.47 kg, and G60: 1.55 kg). All groups increased back squat 1RM (P < 0.0001). However, the main group effect (P < 0.0268) indicated that the CON group showcased a greater overall 1RM (174.7 kg), than the G30 (159.0 kg) and G60 (149.0 kg). Only the G30 group increased RTF at the posttest (CON: 0.13 reps, G30: 5.45 reps, and G60: -0.41 reps) (P < 0.0263). Our findings suggest that trained males can experience significant muscle growth and strength adaptations while maintaining their previous weekly set number above a certain weekly set volume threshold.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Increasing previous resistance training volume by 30% (G30), 60% (G60), or maintenance (CON) on muscular adaptations in trained individuals. Interestingly, CON group resulted in the greatest overall 1RM strength, whereas G30 showed the highest increase in repetitions to failure, with no differences between groups in muscle mass size. These findings suggest that more is not always better for muscle adaptations in a trained cohort, highlighting muscle growth across a wide range of weekly set numbers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信