不同槲皮素制剂理化性质的体外研究。

Q2 Medicine
Afoke Ibi, Chuck Chang, Yiming Zhang, Yun Chai Kuo, Min Du, Kyle Roh, Roland Gahler, Julia Solnier
{"title":"不同槲皮素制剂理化性质的体外研究。","authors":"Afoke Ibi, Chuck Chang, Yiming Zhang, Yun Chai Kuo, Min Du, Kyle Roh, Roland Gahler, Julia Solnier","doi":"10.1515/jcim-2024-2002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Quercetin is a naturally occurring plant flavonoid commonly used as a nutritional supplement due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Its well-known low bioavailability has led to the design of different quercetin formulations by various commercial entities seeking to market a highly bioavailable quercetin product. This study investigates four different commercially available quercetin formulations (LMQ, QUX, QUO, and QUV) for their physicochemical properties that influence bioavailability. LMQ and QUX are liquid-based formulations while QUO and QUV are solid powder-based formulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were conducted on particle size using a particle size analyzer; solubility (in water, simulated gastric and intestinal fluid) using Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) to quantify the quercetin content; intestinal permeability and toxicity using Caco-2 cells and HepG2 liver cells.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LMQ and QUX had the narrowest particle size distribution as well as the highest solubility while QUO and QUV had the widest particle size distribution but the poorest solubility. One formulation (QUO) exhibited a significant reduction in cell viability with HepG2 and Caco-2 cells including a significant decrease in TEER value change (-39.0 %; p<0.01); its higher Caco-2 cell permeability (P<sub>app</sub> 2.85 × 10<sup>-4</sup> ± 4.22 × 10<sup>-5</sup>; p<0.05) likely resulted from reduced membrane integrity. The other formulations significantly increased the TEER value within the first 4 h (<b>≥</b>22.7 %; p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The particle size distribution of each of the individual formulations reflected their solubilities in water and gastrointestinal fluids. Despite QUO having the highest permeability, its negative change in TEER value over time revealed its evident cytotoxic effects. QUV performed poorly in terms of solubility, and permeability. LMQ and QUX were the most consistent across each study with LMQ performing better than QUX overall. Findings of this study present one formulation (LMQ) with superior intestinal absorption while maintaining high cell viability, thus making it one of the safer and more effective quercetin formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15556,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An <i>in vitro</i> investigation on the physicochemical properties of different quercetin formulations.\",\"authors\":\"Afoke Ibi, Chuck Chang, Yiming Zhang, Yun Chai Kuo, Min Du, Kyle Roh, Roland Gahler, Julia Solnier\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jcim-2024-2002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Quercetin is a naturally occurring plant flavonoid commonly used as a nutritional supplement due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Its well-known low bioavailability has led to the design of different quercetin formulations by various commercial entities seeking to market a highly bioavailable quercetin product. This study investigates four different commercially available quercetin formulations (LMQ, QUX, QUO, and QUV) for their physicochemical properties that influence bioavailability. LMQ and QUX are liquid-based formulations while QUO and QUV are solid powder-based formulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were conducted on particle size using a particle size analyzer; solubility (in water, simulated gastric and intestinal fluid) using Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) to quantify the quercetin content; intestinal permeability and toxicity using Caco-2 cells and HepG2 liver cells.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LMQ and QUX had the narrowest particle size distribution as well as the highest solubility while QUO and QUV had the widest particle size distribution but the poorest solubility. One formulation (QUO) exhibited a significant reduction in cell viability with HepG2 and Caco-2 cells including a significant decrease in TEER value change (-39.0 %; p<0.01); its higher Caco-2 cell permeability (P<sub>app</sub> 2.85 × 10<sup>-4</sup> ± 4.22 × 10<sup>-5</sup>; p<0.05) likely resulted from reduced membrane integrity. The other formulations significantly increased the TEER value within the first 4 h (<b>≥</b>22.7 %; p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The particle size distribution of each of the individual formulations reflected their solubilities in water and gastrointestinal fluids. Despite QUO having the highest permeability, its negative change in TEER value over time revealed its evident cytotoxic effects. QUV performed poorly in terms of solubility, and permeability. LMQ and QUX were the most consistent across each study with LMQ performing better than QUX overall. Findings of this study present one formulation (LMQ) with superior intestinal absorption while maintaining high cell viability, thus making it one of the safer and more effective quercetin formulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jcim-2024-2002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jcim-2024-2002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:槲皮素是一种天然存在的植物类黄酮,由于其抗氧化和抗炎特性,通常用作营养补充剂。其众所周知的低生物利用度导致各种商业实体设计不同的槲皮素配方,寻求销售高生物利用度的槲皮素产品。本研究考察了四种不同的市售槲皮素制剂(LMQ、QUX、QUO和QUV)的理化性质对生物利用度的影响。LMQ和QUX是液体配方,而QUO和QUV是固体粉末配方。方法:采用粒度分析仪进行粒度研究;溶解度(在水中、模拟胃液和肠液中)采用超高效液相色谱法(UHPLC)定量槲皮素含量;Caco-2细胞和HepG2肝细胞的肠通透性和毒性研究。结果:LMQ和QUX的粒径分布最窄,溶解度最高;QUO和QUV的粒径分布最宽,溶解度最差。一种制剂(QUO)显示HepG2和Caco-2细胞的细胞活力显著降低,包括TEER值变化显著降低(-39.0 %;帕普2.85 × 10-4±4.22 × 10-5;p≥22.7 %;结论:各制剂的粒径分布反映了其在水和胃肠道液体中的溶解度。尽管QUO具有最高的通透性,但其TEER值随时间的负变化表明其具有明显的细胞毒作用。QUV在溶解度和渗透性方面表现不佳。LMQ和QUX在每项研究中表现最为一致,LMQ的总体表现优于QUX。本研究发现,一种制剂(LMQ)具有良好的肠道吸收,同时保持较高的细胞活力,从而使其成为更安全有效的槲皮素制剂之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An in vitro investigation on the physicochemical properties of different quercetin formulations.

Objectives: Quercetin is a naturally occurring plant flavonoid commonly used as a nutritional supplement due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Its well-known low bioavailability has led to the design of different quercetin formulations by various commercial entities seeking to market a highly bioavailable quercetin product. This study investigates four different commercially available quercetin formulations (LMQ, QUX, QUO, and QUV) for their physicochemical properties that influence bioavailability. LMQ and QUX are liquid-based formulations while QUO and QUV are solid powder-based formulations.

Methods: Studies were conducted on particle size using a particle size analyzer; solubility (in water, simulated gastric and intestinal fluid) using Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) to quantify the quercetin content; intestinal permeability and toxicity using Caco-2 cells and HepG2 liver cells.

Results: LMQ and QUX had the narrowest particle size distribution as well as the highest solubility while QUO and QUV had the widest particle size distribution but the poorest solubility. One formulation (QUO) exhibited a significant reduction in cell viability with HepG2 and Caco-2 cells including a significant decrease in TEER value change (-39.0 %; p<0.01); its higher Caco-2 cell permeability (Papp 2.85 × 10-4 ± 4.22 × 10-5; p<0.05) likely resulted from reduced membrane integrity. The other formulations significantly increased the TEER value within the first 4 h (22.7 %; p<0.05).

Conclusions: The particle size distribution of each of the individual formulations reflected their solubilities in water and gastrointestinal fluids. Despite QUO having the highest permeability, its negative change in TEER value over time revealed its evident cytotoxic effects. QUV performed poorly in terms of solubility, and permeability. LMQ and QUX were the most consistent across each study with LMQ performing better than QUX overall. Findings of this study present one formulation (LMQ) with superior intestinal absorption while maintaining high cell viability, thus making it one of the safer and more effective quercetin formulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine
Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine (JCIM) focuses on evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of complementary medical (CM) whole systems, practices, interventions and natural health products, including herbal and traditional medicines. The journal is edited by Ed Lui of the University of Western Ontario. Topics: -Quality, efficacy, and safety of natural health products, dietary supplements, traditional medicines and their synthetic duplicates -Efficacy and safety of complementary therapies -Evidence-based medicine and practice, including evidence of traditional use -Curriculum development, educational system and competency of complementary health programs -Methodologies on research and evaluation of traditional medicines and herbal products -Integrative medicine: basic and clinical research and practice -Innovation in CAM Curriculum -Educational Material Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信