富自体生长因子浓缩物(GFC)注射治疗骨折不愈合的准实验研究。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-10-05 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-024-01278-1
Karun Jain, Madhan Jeyaraman, Naveen Jeyaraman, Ashim Gupta
{"title":"富自体生长因子浓缩物(GFC)注射治疗骨折不愈合的准实验研究。","authors":"Karun Jain, Madhan Jeyaraman, Naveen Jeyaraman, Ashim Gupta","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01278-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-union fractures represent a significant challenge in orthopedic practice, contributing to considerable morbidity and socioeconomic burden. Traditional treatments, such as autologous bone grafting, are effective but have limitations, including donor-site morbidity and limited tissue availability. Autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics, including growth factor-rich concentrate (GFC), have emerged as a minimally invasive alternative, leveraging the body's natural healing mechanisms by concentrating and applying growth factors directly to the fracture site. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of GFC injections in the treatment of non-union fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This quasi-experimental study included 17 patients with non-union fractures of various long bones, treated under fluoroscopic guidance with three doses of 5 mL GFC injections, administered 2 weeks apart at the non-union site. Demographic data, injury characteristics, and comorbid conditions were recorded. Growth factor levels were quantified via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and statistical analyses were conducted to explore associations between the amount of growth factors and treatment outcomes. Radiographic assessments and bony callus appearance were evaluated at the baseline and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up post-last injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No adverse effects were reported throughout the duration of the study. The majority of patients (82.4%) showed significant improvement, evidenced by enhanced bony callus formation and reduced non-union signs. No significant correlation was found between the specific growth factor levels and the clinical outcomes of non-union of fractures. However, the presence of comorbid conditions significantly influenced treatment efficacy, underscoring the importance of patient selection in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Administration of GFC injection is safe and potentially efficacious for the treatment of non-union fractures, offering an alternative to traditional surgical interventions. These results laid the foundation for prospective, adequately powered, randomized and non-randomized clinical studies with longer follow-up to further establish the efficacy of GFC in patients with non-union fractures. Moreover, formulation protocols need to be optimized while considering patient-specific variables, to ensure reproducibility and repeatability of outcomes from these studies.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01278-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"58 12","pages":"1833-1843"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autologous Growth Factor-Rich Concentrate (GFC) Injection in Non-union of Fractures: A Quasi-experimental Study.\",\"authors\":\"Karun Jain, Madhan Jeyaraman, Naveen Jeyaraman, Ashim Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43465-024-01278-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-union fractures represent a significant challenge in orthopedic practice, contributing to considerable morbidity and socioeconomic burden. Traditional treatments, such as autologous bone grafting, are effective but have limitations, including donor-site morbidity and limited tissue availability. Autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics, including growth factor-rich concentrate (GFC), have emerged as a minimally invasive alternative, leveraging the body's natural healing mechanisms by concentrating and applying growth factors directly to the fracture site. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of GFC injections in the treatment of non-union fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This quasi-experimental study included 17 patients with non-union fractures of various long bones, treated under fluoroscopic guidance with three doses of 5 mL GFC injections, administered 2 weeks apart at the non-union site. Demographic data, injury characteristics, and comorbid conditions were recorded. Growth factor levels were quantified via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and statistical analyses were conducted to explore associations between the amount of growth factors and treatment outcomes. Radiographic assessments and bony callus appearance were evaluated at the baseline and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up post-last injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No adverse effects were reported throughout the duration of the study. The majority of patients (82.4%) showed significant improvement, evidenced by enhanced bony callus formation and reduced non-union signs. No significant correlation was found between the specific growth factor levels and the clinical outcomes of non-union of fractures. However, the presence of comorbid conditions significantly influenced treatment efficacy, underscoring the importance of patient selection in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Administration of GFC injection is safe and potentially efficacious for the treatment of non-union fractures, offering an alternative to traditional surgical interventions. These results laid the foundation for prospective, adequately powered, randomized and non-randomized clinical studies with longer follow-up to further establish the efficacy of GFC in patients with non-union fractures. Moreover, formulation protocols need to be optimized while considering patient-specific variables, to ensure reproducibility and repeatability of outcomes from these studies.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01278-1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"58 12\",\"pages\":\"1833-1843\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628475/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01278-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01278-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:骨不愈合骨折是骨科实践中的一个重大挑战,造成了相当大的发病率和社会经济负担。传统的治疗方法,如自体骨移植,是有效的,但有局限性,包括供体部位的发病率和有限的组织可用性。包括富含生长因子的浓缩物(GFC)在内的自体外周血源骨科已经成为一种微创替代方法,通过将生长因子浓缩并直接应用于骨折部位,利用人体的自然愈合机制。本研究评估了GFC注射治疗骨折不愈合的安全性和有效性。材料和方法:本准实验研究纳入17例不同长骨不愈合骨折患者,在透视引导下,使用3次剂量的5ml GFC注射剂,间隔2周在不愈合部位注射。记录人口统计数据、损伤特征和合并症。通过酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)定量测定生长因子水平,并进行统计学分析,探讨生长因子含量与治疗结果之间的关系。在基线和最后一次注射后1个月、3个月和6个月随访时评估影像学评估和骨痂外观。结果:在整个研究期间未报告任何不良反应。大多数患者(82.4%)表现出明显的改善,表现为骨痂形成增强和骨不连症状减少。特异性生长因子水平与骨折不愈合的临床结果无显著相关性。然而,合并症的存在显著影响治疗效果,强调了临床实践中患者选择的重要性。结论:注射GFC治疗骨折不愈合安全有效,是传统手术治疗的一种替代方法。这些结果为前瞻性、充分有力、随机和非随机、长时间随访的临床研究奠定了基础,以进一步确定GFC对骨折不愈合患者的疗效。此外,需要在考虑患者特异性变量的同时优化配方方案,以确保这些研究结果的再现性和可重复性。补充资料:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1007/s43465-024-01278-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Autologous Growth Factor-Rich Concentrate (GFC) Injection in Non-union of Fractures: A Quasi-experimental Study.

Introduction: Non-union fractures represent a significant challenge in orthopedic practice, contributing to considerable morbidity and socioeconomic burden. Traditional treatments, such as autologous bone grafting, are effective but have limitations, including donor-site morbidity and limited tissue availability. Autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics, including growth factor-rich concentrate (GFC), have emerged as a minimally invasive alternative, leveraging the body's natural healing mechanisms by concentrating and applying growth factors directly to the fracture site. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of GFC injections in the treatment of non-union fractures.

Materials and methods: This quasi-experimental study included 17 patients with non-union fractures of various long bones, treated under fluoroscopic guidance with three doses of 5 mL GFC injections, administered 2 weeks apart at the non-union site. Demographic data, injury characteristics, and comorbid conditions were recorded. Growth factor levels were quantified via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and statistical analyses were conducted to explore associations between the amount of growth factors and treatment outcomes. Radiographic assessments and bony callus appearance were evaluated at the baseline and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up post-last injection.

Results: No adverse effects were reported throughout the duration of the study. The majority of patients (82.4%) showed significant improvement, evidenced by enhanced bony callus formation and reduced non-union signs. No significant correlation was found between the specific growth factor levels and the clinical outcomes of non-union of fractures. However, the presence of comorbid conditions significantly influenced treatment efficacy, underscoring the importance of patient selection in clinical practice.

Conclusion: Administration of GFC injection is safe and potentially efficacious for the treatment of non-union fractures, offering an alternative to traditional surgical interventions. These results laid the foundation for prospective, adequately powered, randomized and non-randomized clinical studies with longer follow-up to further establish the efficacy of GFC in patients with non-union fractures. Moreover, formulation protocols need to be optimized while considering patient-specific variables, to ensure reproducibility and repeatability of outcomes from these studies.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01278-1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信