在尼日利亚使用目视检查和GPHF-Minilab分析筛选不合格和伪造药品:为今后培训卫生工作者和药学人员吸取的经验教训。

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2024.2432471
Micha Lächele, Julia Gabel, Nkiru Sunny-Abarikwu, Rita Ezinwanne Ohazulike, Juliet Ngene, Jane Frances Chioke, Lutz Heide
{"title":"在尼日利亚使用目视检查和GPHF-Minilab分析筛选不合格和伪造药品:为今后培训卫生工作者和药学人员吸取的经验教训。","authors":"Micha Lächele, Julia Gabel, Nkiru Sunny-Abarikwu, Rita Ezinwanne Ohazulike, Juliet Ngene, Jane Frances Chioke, Lutz Heide","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2432471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substandard and falsified (SF) medicines are a serious threat to public health in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Visual inspection of medicines and screening analysis using the Global Pharma Health Fund (GPHF)-Minilab are important in medicine quality surveillance in low-resource settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Recently, 260 medicine samples from Nigeria had been investigated for assay and dissolution according to the United States Pharmacopeia (USP). In the present study, these results were compared to the results of the investigation of the same samples by visual inspection and by GPHF-Minilab analysis by local personnel in Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visual inspection identified many deficiencies of dosage units and packaging information in SF medicines. All four falsified medicines were readily identifiable, primarily from serious spelling errors in the labelling, and from manufacturer names which could not be verified using internet resources. In GPHF-Minilab disintegration testing, two samples did not disintegrate even after 60 min; both were found to fail USP dissolution testing with extreme deviations. Of the 20 samples which deviated in USP assay analysis by more than 20% from the declared API amount, seven (35%) were detected as non-compliant in TLC analysis. Evaluation by TLC image analysis with a recently developed smartphone application (named TLCyzer) increased sensitivity to 62.5% but led to an unacceptably low specificity (75.2%). Additional training of the local personnel improved the results of both TLC analysis and TLCyzer evaluation. Photographs of the visual deficiencies and of the TLC analysis results of the SF medicines are provided as PowerPoint and PDF slides with this publication, for future training courses of pharmacy staff and health workers in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Visual inspection, and screening analysis with simple, rapid and inexpensive methods, are important in the surveillance for SF medicines in LMICs. This study provides data on the potential and the limitations of such screenings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2432471"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for substandard and falsified medicines in Nigeria using visual inspection and GPHF-Minilab analysis: lessons learnt for future training of health workers and pharmacy personnel.\",\"authors\":\"Micha Lächele, Julia Gabel, Nkiru Sunny-Abarikwu, Rita Ezinwanne Ohazulike, Juliet Ngene, Jane Frances Chioke, Lutz Heide\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20523211.2024.2432471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substandard and falsified (SF) medicines are a serious threat to public health in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Visual inspection of medicines and screening analysis using the Global Pharma Health Fund (GPHF)-Minilab are important in medicine quality surveillance in low-resource settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Recently, 260 medicine samples from Nigeria had been investigated for assay and dissolution according to the United States Pharmacopeia (USP). In the present study, these results were compared to the results of the investigation of the same samples by visual inspection and by GPHF-Minilab analysis by local personnel in Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visual inspection identified many deficiencies of dosage units and packaging information in SF medicines. All four falsified medicines were readily identifiable, primarily from serious spelling errors in the labelling, and from manufacturer names which could not be verified using internet resources. In GPHF-Minilab disintegration testing, two samples did not disintegrate even after 60 min; both were found to fail USP dissolution testing with extreme deviations. Of the 20 samples which deviated in USP assay analysis by more than 20% from the declared API amount, seven (35%) were detected as non-compliant in TLC analysis. Evaluation by TLC image analysis with a recently developed smartphone application (named TLCyzer) increased sensitivity to 62.5% but led to an unacceptably low specificity (75.2%). Additional training of the local personnel improved the results of both TLC analysis and TLCyzer evaluation. Photographs of the visual deficiencies and of the TLC analysis results of the SF medicines are provided as PowerPoint and PDF slides with this publication, for future training courses of pharmacy staff and health workers in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Visual inspection, and screening analysis with simple, rapid and inexpensive methods, are important in the surveillance for SF medicines in LMICs. This study provides data on the potential and the limitations of such screenings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"2432471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632929/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2432471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2432471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:伪劣药品是低收入和中等收入国家公共卫生面临的严重威胁。利用全球制药卫生基金(GPHF)-Minilab进行药物目视检查和筛选分析对于资源匮乏环境下的药物质量监测非常重要。方法:根据美国药典(USP)对260份尼日利亚药品样品进行分析和溶出度测定。在本研究中,这些结果与尼日利亚当地人员通过目视检查和GPHF-Minilab分析对相同样品进行的调查结果进行了比较。结果:目视检查发现SF药品的剂量单位和包装信息存在许多缺陷。所有四种假药都很容易识别,主要是由于标签中的严重拼写错误,以及无法使用互联网资源验证的制造商名称。在GPHF-Minilab崩解试验中,两个样品在60 min后仍未崩解;两者都发现USP溶出度测试失败,存在极端偏差。在USP分析中偏离申报API量20%以上的20个样品中,有7个(35%)样品在TLC分析中被检测为不合格。通过最近开发的智能手机应用程序(名为TLCyzer)进行TLC图像分析评估,灵敏度提高到62.5%,但特异性低得令人无法接受(75.2%)。对当地人员的额外培训改善了TLC分析和TLCyzer评价的结果。本出版物以PowerPoint和PDF幻灯片的形式提供了SF药物的视觉缺陷和薄层色谱分析结果的照片,供中低收入国家的药房工作人员和卫生工作者今后的培训课程使用。结论:目视检查和简单、快速、廉价的筛选分析方法在中低收入国家SF药物监测中具有重要意义。这项研究提供了关于这种筛查的潜力和局限性的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening for substandard and falsified medicines in Nigeria using visual inspection and GPHF-Minilab analysis: lessons learnt for future training of health workers and pharmacy personnel.

Background: Substandard and falsified (SF) medicines are a serious threat to public health in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Visual inspection of medicines and screening analysis using the Global Pharma Health Fund (GPHF)-Minilab are important in medicine quality surveillance in low-resource settings.

Methods: Recently, 260 medicine samples from Nigeria had been investigated for assay and dissolution according to the United States Pharmacopeia (USP). In the present study, these results were compared to the results of the investigation of the same samples by visual inspection and by GPHF-Minilab analysis by local personnel in Nigeria.

Results: Visual inspection identified many deficiencies of dosage units and packaging information in SF medicines. All four falsified medicines were readily identifiable, primarily from serious spelling errors in the labelling, and from manufacturer names which could not be verified using internet resources. In GPHF-Minilab disintegration testing, two samples did not disintegrate even after 60 min; both were found to fail USP dissolution testing with extreme deviations. Of the 20 samples which deviated in USP assay analysis by more than 20% from the declared API amount, seven (35%) were detected as non-compliant in TLC analysis. Evaluation by TLC image analysis with a recently developed smartphone application (named TLCyzer) increased sensitivity to 62.5% but led to an unacceptably low specificity (75.2%). Additional training of the local personnel improved the results of both TLC analysis and TLCyzer evaluation. Photographs of the visual deficiencies and of the TLC analysis results of the SF medicines are provided as PowerPoint and PDF slides with this publication, for future training courses of pharmacy staff and health workers in LMICs.

Conclusion: Visual inspection, and screening analysis with simple, rapid and inexpensive methods, are important in the surveillance for SF medicines in LMICs. This study provides data on the potential and the limitations of such screenings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信