欧洲少数民族痴呆症评估:一项14年随访调查

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
T. Rune Nielsen, Alexandre de Mendonça, Lutz Frölich, Sebastiaan Engelborghs, Dianne Gove, Daphné Lamirel, Clara Calia, Gunhild Waldemar
{"title":"欧洲少数民族痴呆症评估:一项14年随访调查","authors":"T. Rune Nielsen,&nbsp;Alexandre de Mendonça,&nbsp;Lutz Frölich,&nbsp;Sebastiaan Engelborghs,&nbsp;Dianne Gove,&nbsp;Daphné Lamirel,&nbsp;Clara Calia,&nbsp;Gunhild Waldemar","doi":"10.1002/gps.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>There is no European consensus on good clinical practice for timely diagnosis and culturally appropriate care of people with dementia from minority ethnic groups. Despite significant advances in culture-sensitive dementia diagnostics, little is known about how this has been implemented in clinical practice. The aims of this follow-up survey were to explore current practices for assessing dementia in patients from minority ethnic groups in Europe and to determine whether barriers in access to specialized dementia services have changed during the last 14 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in the European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) in June 2023. The survey utilized questionnaires from a previous EADC survey from 2009 and focused on different points in the clinical assessment of dementia in patients from minority ethnic groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-three centers from 15 countries participated in the survey, of which 21 were the same as in the 2009 survey. Patients from minority ethnic groups were seen on a regular basis in 91% of these centers, which was a significant increase compared to 2009 (69%, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Despite perceived clinical expertise increasing, implemented strategies for bypassing cultural and linguistic barriers were sparse and communication problems and lack of adequate assessment tools continued to be the main perceived barriers in diagnostic assessment of dementia in minority ethnic groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Patients from minority ethnic groups are increasingly being referred for diagnostic assessment of dementia in Europe. Despite some improvements, diagnostic challenges generally remained the same as in 2009 and there is a continuous need to implement effective cross-cultural communication and assessment practices.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Dementia in Minority Ethnic Groups in Europe: A 14-Year Follow-Up Survey\",\"authors\":\"T. Rune Nielsen,&nbsp;Alexandre de Mendonça,&nbsp;Lutz Frölich,&nbsp;Sebastiaan Engelborghs,&nbsp;Dianne Gove,&nbsp;Daphné Lamirel,&nbsp;Clara Calia,&nbsp;Gunhild Waldemar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gps.70034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is no European consensus on good clinical practice for timely diagnosis and culturally appropriate care of people with dementia from minority ethnic groups. Despite significant advances in culture-sensitive dementia diagnostics, little is known about how this has been implemented in clinical practice. The aims of this follow-up survey were to explore current practices for assessing dementia in patients from minority ethnic groups in Europe and to determine whether barriers in access to specialized dementia services have changed during the last 14 years.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in the European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) in June 2023. The survey utilized questionnaires from a previous EADC survey from 2009 and focused on different points in the clinical assessment of dementia in patients from minority ethnic groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty-three centers from 15 countries participated in the survey, of which 21 were the same as in the 2009 survey. Patients from minority ethnic groups were seen on a regular basis in 91% of these centers, which was a significant increase compared to 2009 (69%, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Despite perceived clinical expertise increasing, implemented strategies for bypassing cultural and linguistic barriers were sparse and communication problems and lack of adequate assessment tools continued to be the main perceived barriers in diagnostic assessment of dementia in minority ethnic groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients from minority ethnic groups are increasingly being referred for diagnostic assessment of dementia in Europe. Despite some improvements, diagnostic challenges generally remained the same as in 2009 and there is a continuous need to implement effective cross-cultural communication and assessment practices.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"39 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634820/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.70034\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.70034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对于少数民族痴呆症患者的及时诊断和文化上适当的护理,欧洲尚无良好的临床实践共识。尽管在文化敏感性痴呆诊断方面取得了重大进展,但人们对这在临床实践中的实施知之甚少。这项后续调查的目的是探讨目前评估欧洲少数民族痴呆症患者的做法,并确定在过去14年中获得专门痴呆症服务的障碍是否发生了变化。方法:于2023年6月在欧洲阿尔茨海默病联盟(EADC)进行横断面在线调查。该调查使用了2009年EADC之前调查的问卷,重点关注少数民族痴呆症患者临床评估的不同点。结果:15个国家的33个中心参与了此次调查,其中21个中心与2009年的调查相同。91%的少数民族患者在这些中心定期就诊,与2009年相比显著增加(69%,p = 0.04)。尽管临床专业知识有所增加,但绕过文化和语言障碍的实施策略很少,沟通问题和缺乏适当的评估工具仍然是少数民族痴呆症诊断评估的主要障碍。结论:在欧洲,越来越多的少数民族患者被推荐进行痴呆的诊断评估。尽管有所改善,但诊断挑战总体上与2009年相同,需要继续实施有效的跨文化沟通和评估实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessment of Dementia in Minority Ethnic Groups in Europe: A 14-Year Follow-Up Survey

Assessment of Dementia in Minority Ethnic Groups in Europe: A 14-Year Follow-Up Survey

Objectives

There is no European consensus on good clinical practice for timely diagnosis and culturally appropriate care of people with dementia from minority ethnic groups. Despite significant advances in culture-sensitive dementia diagnostics, little is known about how this has been implemented in clinical practice. The aims of this follow-up survey were to explore current practices for assessing dementia in patients from minority ethnic groups in Europe and to determine whether barriers in access to specialized dementia services have changed during the last 14 years.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in the European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) in June 2023. The survey utilized questionnaires from a previous EADC survey from 2009 and focused on different points in the clinical assessment of dementia in patients from minority ethnic groups.

Results

Thirty-three centers from 15 countries participated in the survey, of which 21 were the same as in the 2009 survey. Patients from minority ethnic groups were seen on a regular basis in 91% of these centers, which was a significant increase compared to 2009 (69%, p = 0.04). Despite perceived clinical expertise increasing, implemented strategies for bypassing cultural and linguistic barriers were sparse and communication problems and lack of adequate assessment tools continued to be the main perceived barriers in diagnostic assessment of dementia in minority ethnic groups.

Conclusions

Patients from minority ethnic groups are increasingly being referred for diagnostic assessment of dementia in Europe. Despite some improvements, diagnostic challenges generally remained the same as in 2009 and there is a continuous need to implement effective cross-cultural communication and assessment practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers. The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信