Melissa L New, Tristan J Huie, Dru Claar, Timothy Amass, Ryan A Peterson, Max McGrath, Nicholas Jacobson, Anna Neumeier, Darlene Nelson
{"title":"虚拟现实解剖学教练将支气管超声教学从内到外。","authors":"Melissa L New, Tristan J Huie, Dru Claar, Timothy Amass, Ryan A Peterson, Max McGrath, Nicholas Jacobson, Anna Neumeier, Darlene Nelson","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional approaches for learning anatomy for curvilinear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) require learners to mentally visualize structures relative to the position of the bronchoscope. Virtual reality (VR) can show anatomy from the perspective of bronchoscopic tools.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does the use of a VR anatomy trainer for teaching EBUS-associated anatomy improve procedural performance compared with traditional methods?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>In this randomized, crossover study design, participants studied EBUS-related anatomy during two sequential sessions using a VR trainer and a traditional modality (two-dimensional pictures or a three-dimensional model). An EBUS simulator was used to test performance at baseline and following each training session. User experience and preferences were evaluated by using a mixed-methods approach of surveys and interviews. Spatial reasoning ability was measured by using the Mental Rotation Test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight fellows and residents at three institutions completed the study. All three learning methods improved EBUS performance significantly following the first, but not second, learning session. Learners spent more time (1.37 minutes) with VR, but no training method produced a greater improvement. Spatial reasoning ability was associated with improved EBUS performance. This impact was modified by training method: the VR approach leveled the impact of baseline spatial reasoning. The VR approach was preferred by 96% of learners. Qualitative data revealed a positive VR user experience with focused anatomy learning, ease of use, acceptable realism, and tolerance. This novel \"inside-looking-out\" perspective helped learners understand anatomy from the vantage of procedural tools and to create a mental map, but interpreting ultrasound remained challenging.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>A VR anatomy trainer was preferred by learners because it provided visualization that aligned best with the procedural perspective. This approach helped learners of all spatial reasoning ability improve their procedural performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual Reality Anatomy Trainer Turns Teaching Endobronchial Ultrasound Inside-Out.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa L New, Tristan J Huie, Dru Claar, Timothy Amass, Ryan A Peterson, Max McGrath, Nicholas Jacobson, Anna Neumeier, Darlene Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional approaches for learning anatomy for curvilinear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) require learners to mentally visualize structures relative to the position of the bronchoscope. Virtual reality (VR) can show anatomy from the perspective of bronchoscopic tools.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does the use of a VR anatomy trainer for teaching EBUS-associated anatomy improve procedural performance compared with traditional methods?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>In this randomized, crossover study design, participants studied EBUS-related anatomy during two sequential sessions using a VR trainer and a traditional modality (two-dimensional pictures or a three-dimensional model). An EBUS simulator was used to test performance at baseline and following each training session. User experience and preferences were evaluated by using a mixed-methods approach of surveys and interviews. Spatial reasoning ability was measured by using the Mental Rotation Test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight fellows and residents at three institutions completed the study. All three learning methods improved EBUS performance significantly following the first, but not second, learning session. Learners spent more time (1.37 minutes) with VR, but no training method produced a greater improvement. Spatial reasoning ability was associated with improved EBUS performance. This impact was modified by training method: the VR approach leveled the impact of baseline spatial reasoning. The VR approach was preferred by 96% of learners. Qualitative data revealed a positive VR user experience with focused anatomy learning, ease of use, acceptable realism, and tolerance. This novel \\\"inside-looking-out\\\" perspective helped learners understand anatomy from the vantage of procedural tools and to create a mental map, but interpreting ultrasound remained challenging.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>A VR anatomy trainer was preferred by learners because it provided visualization that aligned best with the procedural perspective. This approach helped learners of all spatial reasoning ability improve their procedural performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.032\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Traditional approaches for learning anatomy for curvilinear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) require learners to mentally visualize structures relative to the position of the bronchoscope. Virtual reality (VR) can show anatomy from the perspective of bronchoscopic tools.
Research question: Does the use of a VR anatomy trainer for teaching EBUS-associated anatomy improve procedural performance compared with traditional methods?
Study design and methods: In this randomized, crossover study design, participants studied EBUS-related anatomy during two sequential sessions using a VR trainer and a traditional modality (two-dimensional pictures or a three-dimensional model). An EBUS simulator was used to test performance at baseline and following each training session. User experience and preferences were evaluated by using a mixed-methods approach of surveys and interviews. Spatial reasoning ability was measured by using the Mental Rotation Test.
Results: Sixty-eight fellows and residents at three institutions completed the study. All three learning methods improved EBUS performance significantly following the first, but not second, learning session. Learners spent more time (1.37 minutes) with VR, but no training method produced a greater improvement. Spatial reasoning ability was associated with improved EBUS performance. This impact was modified by training method: the VR approach leveled the impact of baseline spatial reasoning. The VR approach was preferred by 96% of learners. Qualitative data revealed a positive VR user experience with focused anatomy learning, ease of use, acceptable realism, and tolerance. This novel "inside-looking-out" perspective helped learners understand anatomy from the vantage of procedural tools and to create a mental map, but interpreting ultrasound remained challenging.
Interpretation: A VR anatomy trainer was preferred by learners because it provided visualization that aligned best with the procedural perspective. This approach helped learners of all spatial reasoning ability improve their procedural performance.
期刊介绍:
At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.