虚拟现实解剖学教练将支气管超声教学从内到外。

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.032
Melissa L New, Tristan J Huie, Dru Claar, Timothy Amass, Ryan A Peterson, Max McGrath, Nicholas Jacobson, Anna Neumeier, Darlene Nelson
{"title":"虚拟现实解剖学教练将支气管超声教学从内到外。","authors":"Melissa L New, Tristan J Huie, Dru Claar, Timothy Amass, Ryan A Peterson, Max McGrath, Nicholas Jacobson, Anna Neumeier, Darlene Nelson","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional approaches for learning anatomy for curvilinear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) require learners to mentally visualize structures relative to the position of the bronchoscope. Virtual reality (VR) can show anatomy from the perspective of bronchoscopic tools.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does the use of a VR anatomy trainer for teaching EBUS-associated anatomy improve procedural performance compared with traditional methods?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>In this randomized, crossover study design, participants studied EBUS-related anatomy during two sequential sessions using a VR trainer and a traditional modality (two-dimensional pictures or a three-dimensional model). An EBUS simulator was used to test performance at baseline and following each training session. User experience and preferences were evaluated by using a mixed-methods approach of surveys and interviews. Spatial reasoning ability was measured by using the Mental Rotation Test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight fellows and residents at three institutions completed the study. All three learning methods improved EBUS performance significantly following the first, but not second, learning session. Learners spent more time (1.37 minutes) with VR, but no training method produced a greater improvement. Spatial reasoning ability was associated with improved EBUS performance. This impact was modified by training method: the VR approach leveled the impact of baseline spatial reasoning. The VR approach was preferred by 96% of learners. Qualitative data revealed a positive VR user experience with focused anatomy learning, ease of use, acceptable realism, and tolerance. This novel \"inside-looking-out\" perspective helped learners understand anatomy from the vantage of procedural tools and to create a mental map, but interpreting ultrasound remained challenging.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>A VR anatomy trainer was preferred by learners because it provided visualization that aligned best with the procedural perspective. This approach helped learners of all spatial reasoning ability improve their procedural performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual Reality Anatomy Trainer Turns Teaching Endobronchial Ultrasound Inside-Out.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa L New, Tristan J Huie, Dru Claar, Timothy Amass, Ryan A Peterson, Max McGrath, Nicholas Jacobson, Anna Neumeier, Darlene Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional approaches for learning anatomy for curvilinear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) require learners to mentally visualize structures relative to the position of the bronchoscope. Virtual reality (VR) can show anatomy from the perspective of bronchoscopic tools.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does the use of a VR anatomy trainer for teaching EBUS-associated anatomy improve procedural performance compared with traditional methods?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>In this randomized, crossover study design, participants studied EBUS-related anatomy during two sequential sessions using a VR trainer and a traditional modality (two-dimensional pictures or a three-dimensional model). An EBUS simulator was used to test performance at baseline and following each training session. User experience and preferences were evaluated by using a mixed-methods approach of surveys and interviews. Spatial reasoning ability was measured by using the Mental Rotation Test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight fellows and residents at three institutions completed the study. All three learning methods improved EBUS performance significantly following the first, but not second, learning session. Learners spent more time (1.37 minutes) with VR, but no training method produced a greater improvement. Spatial reasoning ability was associated with improved EBUS performance. This impact was modified by training method: the VR approach leveled the impact of baseline spatial reasoning. The VR approach was preferred by 96% of learners. Qualitative data revealed a positive VR user experience with focused anatomy learning, ease of use, acceptable realism, and tolerance. This novel \\\"inside-looking-out\\\" perspective helped learners understand anatomy from the vantage of procedural tools and to create a mental map, but interpreting ultrasound remained challenging.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>A VR anatomy trainer was preferred by learners because it provided visualization that aligned best with the procedural perspective. This approach helped learners of all spatial reasoning ability improve their procedural performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.032\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:学习曲线支气管超声(EBUS)解剖的传统方法要求学习者在心理上可视化相对于支气管镜位置的结构。虚拟现实(VR)可以从支气管镜工具的角度展示解剖。研究问题:与传统方法相比,使用VR解剖培训器进行ebus相关解剖教学是否能提高手术表现?研究设计和方法:在这项随机交叉研究设计中,受试者使用VR训练器和传统模式(二维图像(2D)或三维模型(3D))在两个连续的会话中研究ebus相关解剖。EBUS模拟器用于测试基线和每次训练后的表现。使用调查和访谈的混合方法来评估用户体验和偏好。空间推理能力采用心理旋转测验(MRT)进行测试。结果:来自三家机构的68名研究员和住院医生完成了这项研究。在第一次学习后,这三种学习方法都显著提高了EBUS的表现,而在第二次学习后则没有。学习者使用VR的时间更长(1.37分钟),但没有任何一种训练方法能产生更大的改善。空间推理能力与EBUS性能的提高有关。这种影响通过训练方法得到修正:虚拟现实方法使基线空间推理的影响持平。96%的学习者更喜欢VR方法。定性数据显示,VR用户体验具有专注的解剖学学习、易用性、可接受的真实感和容忍度。这种新颖的“由内而外”的视角帮助学习者从程序工具的优势来理解解剖学,并创建一个心理地图,但解释超声波仍然具有挑战性。解释:学习者更喜欢VR解剖学培训师,因为它提供了与程序视角最一致的可视化。这种方法有助于具有各种空间推理能力的学习者提高他们的程序表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual Reality Anatomy Trainer Turns Teaching Endobronchial Ultrasound Inside-Out.

Background: Traditional approaches for learning anatomy for curvilinear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) require learners to mentally visualize structures relative to the position of the bronchoscope. Virtual reality (VR) can show anatomy from the perspective of bronchoscopic tools.

Research question: Does the use of a VR anatomy trainer for teaching EBUS-associated anatomy improve procedural performance compared with traditional methods?

Study design and methods: In this randomized, crossover study design, participants studied EBUS-related anatomy during two sequential sessions using a VR trainer and a traditional modality (two-dimensional pictures or a three-dimensional model). An EBUS simulator was used to test performance at baseline and following each training session. User experience and preferences were evaluated by using a mixed-methods approach of surveys and interviews. Spatial reasoning ability was measured by using the Mental Rotation Test.

Results: Sixty-eight fellows and residents at three institutions completed the study. All three learning methods improved EBUS performance significantly following the first, but not second, learning session. Learners spent more time (1.37 minutes) with VR, but no training method produced a greater improvement. Spatial reasoning ability was associated with improved EBUS performance. This impact was modified by training method: the VR approach leveled the impact of baseline spatial reasoning. The VR approach was preferred by 96% of learners. Qualitative data revealed a positive VR user experience with focused anatomy learning, ease of use, acceptable realism, and tolerance. This novel "inside-looking-out" perspective helped learners understand anatomy from the vantage of procedural tools and to create a mental map, but interpreting ultrasound remained challenging.

Interpretation: A VR anatomy trainer was preferred by learners because it provided visualization that aligned best with the procedural perspective. This approach helped learners of all spatial reasoning ability improve their procedural performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信