Maura Cosetti , Liraz Arie , Jennifer Kelly , Jennifer Ren , Anat V. Lubetzky
{"title":"iTUG的双重任务是调查双侧听力损失的老年人跌倒风险增加的情况。","authors":"Maura Cosetti , Liraz Arie , Jennifer Kelly , Jennifer Ren , Anat V. Lubetzky","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate fall risk among older adults with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (BHL) by comparing single task (ST) and dual task (DT) performance on the instrumented “Timed Up & Go” test (iTUG). The TUG is a well-validated clinical tool for fall risk; addition of wireless sensors increases the test's sensitivity and allows for subcomponent analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adults with audiometrically confirmed normal hearing or BHL were prospectively recruited and screened for visual, musculoskeletal, neurologic, or vestibular pathology and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) < 10. Total and sub-component iTUG data in the ST and DT condition (serial subtraction) was collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>35 adults (50–78 years) were included: 20 (mean 69 years) with BHL and 15 controls (mean age 63 years). Total iTUG duration did not differ between groups in either the ST or DT condition. In sit-to-stand, BHL were significantly slower than controls (<em>p</em> < 0.03) in both ST and DT conditions. In the final subcomponent (stand-to-sit), a significant interaction was observed such that the BHL group were significantly slower with DT compared to the control group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>BHL performed slower on sub-component analysis of the iTUG compared with age-matched normal hearing controls. Slower times on the final iTUG phase for BHL may suggest a lower threshold for attentional capacity that may be cumulative. Further investigation into the impact of treatment (including amplification and training) is warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"46 1","pages":"Article 104536"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual task iTUG to investigate increased fall risk among older adults with bilateral hearing loss\",\"authors\":\"Maura Cosetti , Liraz Arie , Jennifer Kelly , Jennifer Ren , Anat V. Lubetzky\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate fall risk among older adults with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (BHL) by comparing single task (ST) and dual task (DT) performance on the instrumented “Timed Up & Go” test (iTUG). The TUG is a well-validated clinical tool for fall risk; addition of wireless sensors increases the test's sensitivity and allows for subcomponent analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adults with audiometrically confirmed normal hearing or BHL were prospectively recruited and screened for visual, musculoskeletal, neurologic, or vestibular pathology and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) < 10. Total and sub-component iTUG data in the ST and DT condition (serial subtraction) was collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>35 adults (50–78 years) were included: 20 (mean 69 years) with BHL and 15 controls (mean age 63 years). Total iTUG duration did not differ between groups in either the ST or DT condition. In sit-to-stand, BHL were significantly slower than controls (<em>p</em> < 0.03) in both ST and DT conditions. In the final subcomponent (stand-to-sit), a significant interaction was observed such that the BHL group were significantly slower with DT compared to the control group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>BHL performed slower on sub-component analysis of the iTUG compared with age-matched normal hearing controls. Slower times on the final iTUG phase for BHL may suggest a lower threshold for attentional capacity that may be cumulative. Further investigation into the impact of treatment (including amplification and training) is warranted.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 104536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924003223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924003223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dual task iTUG to investigate increased fall risk among older adults with bilateral hearing loss
Objectives
To investigate fall risk among older adults with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (BHL) by comparing single task (ST) and dual task (DT) performance on the instrumented “Timed Up & Go” test (iTUG). The TUG is a well-validated clinical tool for fall risk; addition of wireless sensors increases the test's sensitivity and allows for subcomponent analysis.
Methods
Adults with audiometrically confirmed normal hearing or BHL were prospectively recruited and screened for visual, musculoskeletal, neurologic, or vestibular pathology and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) < 10. Total and sub-component iTUG data in the ST and DT condition (serial subtraction) was collected.
Results
35 adults (50–78 years) were included: 20 (mean 69 years) with BHL and 15 controls (mean age 63 years). Total iTUG duration did not differ between groups in either the ST or DT condition. In sit-to-stand, BHL were significantly slower than controls (p < 0.03) in both ST and DT conditions. In the final subcomponent (stand-to-sit), a significant interaction was observed such that the BHL group were significantly slower with DT compared to the control group.
Conclusions
BHL performed slower on sub-component analysis of the iTUG compared with age-matched normal hearing controls. Slower times on the final iTUG phase for BHL may suggest a lower threshold for attentional capacity that may be cumulative. Further investigation into the impact of treatment (including amplification and training) is warranted.
期刊介绍:
Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.