Anastasia Alexandridou, Caroline S Stokes, Dietrich A Volmer
{"title":"血清游离维生素D浓度的测定:重要性、挑战和质谱法的新作用","authors":"Anastasia Alexandridou, Caroline S Stokes, Dietrich A Volmer","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration is the most widely used clinical biomarker for vitamin D status. Under certain physiological and pathological conditions, however, total 25(OH)D may not always be the best index for vitamin D status. Instead, the nonprotein-bound (free) fraction of total 25(OH)D has been suggested as a more appropriate marker in certain clinical situations. Content Free 25(OH)D levels can either be calculated or measured directly. Calculated free 25(OH)D depends on the concentrations of total serum 25(OH)D, vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), and albumin, as well as the affinity between analyte and binding proteins. Differences in VDBP concentrations are observed between populations as a result of health status, gene polymorphisms, and the assay used for determination. Direct measurement methods for free 25(OH)D are often complicated (dialysis, ultrafiltration) or susceptible to interferences, cross-reactivity, and type of antibody (immunoassays). Therefore, it is very important to develop tools that allow either accurate and precise measurement of VDBP or direct measurement of free 25(OH)D. For the latter, liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) has recently shown promise for analysis of free vitamin D. In the current review, we present the importance and challenges regarding free 25(OH)D determination and the role of LC–MS-based methods in future studies. Summary More research is required to determine the role of free 25(OH)D in the assessment of vitamin D status in healthy subjects and in various clinical conditions. Recent advances in technology, including mass spectrometry, can provide the required assays for this purpose.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of Serum Free Vitamin D Concentrations: Importance, Challenges, and the Emerging Role of Mass Spectrometry\",\"authors\":\"Anastasia Alexandridou, Caroline S Stokes, Dietrich A Volmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinchem/hvae202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration is the most widely used clinical biomarker for vitamin D status. Under certain physiological and pathological conditions, however, total 25(OH)D may not always be the best index for vitamin D status. Instead, the nonprotein-bound (free) fraction of total 25(OH)D has been suggested as a more appropriate marker in certain clinical situations. Content Free 25(OH)D levels can either be calculated or measured directly. Calculated free 25(OH)D depends on the concentrations of total serum 25(OH)D, vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), and albumin, as well as the affinity between analyte and binding proteins. Differences in VDBP concentrations are observed between populations as a result of health status, gene polymorphisms, and the assay used for determination. Direct measurement methods for free 25(OH)D are often complicated (dialysis, ultrafiltration) or susceptible to interferences, cross-reactivity, and type of antibody (immunoassays). Therefore, it is very important to develop tools that allow either accurate and precise measurement of VDBP or direct measurement of free 25(OH)D. For the latter, liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) has recently shown promise for analysis of free vitamin D. In the current review, we present the importance and challenges regarding free 25(OH)D determination and the role of LC–MS-based methods in future studies. Summary More research is required to determine the role of free 25(OH)D in the assessment of vitamin D status in healthy subjects and in various clinical conditions. Recent advances in technology, including mass spectrometry, can provide the required assays for this purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae202\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measurement of Serum Free Vitamin D Concentrations: Importance, Challenges, and the Emerging Role of Mass Spectrometry
Background Serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration is the most widely used clinical biomarker for vitamin D status. Under certain physiological and pathological conditions, however, total 25(OH)D may not always be the best index for vitamin D status. Instead, the nonprotein-bound (free) fraction of total 25(OH)D has been suggested as a more appropriate marker in certain clinical situations. Content Free 25(OH)D levels can either be calculated or measured directly. Calculated free 25(OH)D depends on the concentrations of total serum 25(OH)D, vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), and albumin, as well as the affinity between analyte and binding proteins. Differences in VDBP concentrations are observed between populations as a result of health status, gene polymorphisms, and the assay used for determination. Direct measurement methods for free 25(OH)D are often complicated (dialysis, ultrafiltration) or susceptible to interferences, cross-reactivity, and type of antibody (immunoassays). Therefore, it is very important to develop tools that allow either accurate and precise measurement of VDBP or direct measurement of free 25(OH)D. For the latter, liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) has recently shown promise for analysis of free vitamin D. In the current review, we present the importance and challenges regarding free 25(OH)D determination and the role of LC–MS-based methods in future studies. Summary More research is required to determine the role of free 25(OH)D in the assessment of vitamin D status in healthy subjects and in various clinical conditions. Recent advances in technology, including mass spectrometry, can provide the required assays for this purpose.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM).
The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics.
In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology.
The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.