让患者参与创新医疗器械的医院卫生技术评估:适应特定的当地环境和从评估人类供体心脏的离体灌注系统中吸取的教训。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jamal Atfeh, Pascale Guerre, Alexandre Berkesse, Gwenaëlle Thual, Matteo Pozzi, Laure Huot
{"title":"让患者参与创新医疗器械的医院卫生技术评估:适应特定的当地环境和从评估人类供体心脏的离体灌注系统中吸取的教训。","authors":"Jamal Atfeh,&nbsp;Pascale Guerre,&nbsp;Alexandre Berkesse,&nbsp;Gwenaëlle Thual,&nbsp;Matteo Pozzi,&nbsp;Laure Huot","doi":"10.1111/hex.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>A demand from the cardiac surgery and heart transplantation department of a French (Lyon) university hospital to adopt an ex-vivo perfusion system of human donor hearts was a chance to actively involve patients in our hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We selected an existing framework for patient involvement in HB-HTA and involved patients at two stages of the HB-HTA process: evaluation and dissemination. Firstly, we conducted a consultation-oriented workshop to gather patient perspectives on the introduction of the technology in our hospital, based on their significant experience of healthcare. Secondly, we organized an information-oriented workshop to communicate the HB-HTA results to the patients consulted, after the decision had been taken.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We modified the framework for patient involvement to suit the local decision-making context, the HB-HTA methodology, and the type of technologies assessed in our institution. Patients perceived the ex-vivo perfusion system as a promising technology to facilitate access to heart transplantation. They emphasized the importance of a tailored information provided to patients about the potential use of the technology in their healthcare trajectories, and suggested involvement of patients to facilitate its implementation in hospitals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Modifying existing frameworks for patient involvement to fit specific local contexts should be encouraged, and has to address the need of timely information for decision-makers and patient recruitment issues. Decision to incorporate patient perspectives and experiences should be made on a project-by-project basis, and focus on innovative medical devices with expected significant impact on patient quality of life. Effective and transparent communication and prospective feedbacks from HB-HTA producers to patients are essential for a successful process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Three patients with a lived experience of heart transplantation, or another transplant procedure, or more broadly procedures involving innovative medical devices (specialists) and two patients recruited for societal issues and legitimacy of a collective voice were involved (generalists).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Involving Patients in Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment of Innovative Medical Devices: Adapting to a Specific Local Context and Lessons Learned From the Assessment of an Ex Vivo Perfusion System of Human Donor Hearts\",\"authors\":\"Jamal Atfeh,&nbsp;Pascale Guerre,&nbsp;Alexandre Berkesse,&nbsp;Gwenaëlle Thual,&nbsp;Matteo Pozzi,&nbsp;Laure Huot\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>A demand from the cardiac surgery and heart transplantation department of a French (Lyon) university hospital to adopt an ex-vivo perfusion system of human donor hearts was a chance to actively involve patients in our hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) process.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We selected an existing framework for patient involvement in HB-HTA and involved patients at two stages of the HB-HTA process: evaluation and dissemination. Firstly, we conducted a consultation-oriented workshop to gather patient perspectives on the introduction of the technology in our hospital, based on their significant experience of healthcare. Secondly, we organized an information-oriented workshop to communicate the HB-HTA results to the patients consulted, after the decision had been taken.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We modified the framework for patient involvement to suit the local decision-making context, the HB-HTA methodology, and the type of technologies assessed in our institution. Patients perceived the ex-vivo perfusion system as a promising technology to facilitate access to heart transplantation. They emphasized the importance of a tailored information provided to patients about the potential use of the technology in their healthcare trajectories, and suggested involvement of patients to facilitate its implementation in hospitals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Modifying existing frameworks for patient involvement to fit specific local contexts should be encouraged, and has to address the need of timely information for decision-makers and patient recruitment issues. Decision to incorporate patient perspectives and experiences should be made on a project-by-project basis, and focus on innovative medical devices with expected significant impact on patient quality of life. Effective and transparent communication and prospective feedbacks from HB-HTA producers to patients are essential for a successful process.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>Three patients with a lived experience of heart transplantation, or another transplant procedure, or more broadly procedures involving innovative medical devices (specialists) and two patients recruited for societal issues and legitimacy of a collective voice were involved (generalists).</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632624/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70119\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:法国(里昂)大学医院心脏外科和心脏移植科要求采用人类供体心脏离体灌注系统,这是一个让患者积极参与我们医院卫生技术评估(HB-HTA)过程的机会。材料和方法:我们选择了一个现有的患者参与HB-HTA的框架,并在HB-HTA过程的两个阶段参与患者:评估和传播。首先,我们举办了一个以咨询为导向的研讨会,根据患者在医疗保健方面的丰富经验,收集他们对在我们医院引入该技术的看法。其次,在做出决定后,我们组织了一个信息导向的研讨会,将HB-HTA结果传达给被咨询的患者。结果:我们修改了患者参与的框架,以适应当地的决策环境、HB-HTA方法和我们机构评估的技术类型。患者认为离体灌注系统是一种很有前途的技术,可以促进心脏移植。他们强调向患者提供有关该技术在其医疗保健轨迹中可能使用情况的量身定制信息的重要性,并建议患者参与,以促进该技术在医院的实施。讨论:应鼓励修改现有的患者参与框架以适应具体的地方情况,并且必须解决决策者和患者招募问题的及时信息需求。应在每个项目的基础上决定纳入患者的观点和经验,并将重点放在预期对患者生活质量有重大影响的创新医疗设备上。有效和透明的沟通以及HB-HTA生产商对患者的前瞻性反馈对于成功的治疗过程至关重要。患者或公众贡献:参与了三名有过心脏移植或其他移植手术经验的患者,或涉及创新医疗设备的更广泛的手术(专家)和两名因社会问题和集体声音的合法性而招募的患者(通才)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Involving Patients in Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment of Innovative Medical Devices: Adapting to a Specific Local Context and Lessons Learned From the Assessment of an Ex Vivo Perfusion System of Human Donor Hearts

Introduction

A demand from the cardiac surgery and heart transplantation department of a French (Lyon) university hospital to adopt an ex-vivo perfusion system of human donor hearts was a chance to actively involve patients in our hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) process.

Material and Methods

We selected an existing framework for patient involvement in HB-HTA and involved patients at two stages of the HB-HTA process: evaluation and dissemination. Firstly, we conducted a consultation-oriented workshop to gather patient perspectives on the introduction of the technology in our hospital, based on their significant experience of healthcare. Secondly, we organized an information-oriented workshop to communicate the HB-HTA results to the patients consulted, after the decision had been taken.

Results

We modified the framework for patient involvement to suit the local decision-making context, the HB-HTA methodology, and the type of technologies assessed in our institution. Patients perceived the ex-vivo perfusion system as a promising technology to facilitate access to heart transplantation. They emphasized the importance of a tailored information provided to patients about the potential use of the technology in their healthcare trajectories, and suggested involvement of patients to facilitate its implementation in hospitals.

Discussion

Modifying existing frameworks for patient involvement to fit specific local contexts should be encouraged, and has to address the need of timely information for decision-makers and patient recruitment issues. Decision to incorporate patient perspectives and experiences should be made on a project-by-project basis, and focus on innovative medical devices with expected significant impact on patient quality of life. Effective and transparent communication and prospective feedbacks from HB-HTA producers to patients are essential for a successful process.

Patient or Public Contribution

Three patients with a lived experience of heart transplantation, or another transplant procedure, or more broadly procedures involving innovative medical devices (specialists) and two patients recruited for societal issues and legitimacy of a collective voice were involved (generalists).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信