急性呼吸衰竭患者的高流量鼻吸氧与无创通气:RENOVATE随机临床试验

IF 63.1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Israel S Maia, Letícia Kawano-Dourado, Lucas Tramujas, Neymar Elias de Oliveira, Rafael Naoki Souza, Dhaisi Faustino Signorini, Mariangela Pimentel Pincelli, Cássio Luis Zandonai, Regiane Tamires Blasius, Fabrício Freires, Vanessa Marques Ferreira, Marcelo Luz Pereira Romano, Mieko Claudia Miura, Caroline Maschio de Censo, Eliana Bernadete Caser, Betania Silva, Daniela Correia Santos Bonomo, Jussara Alencar Arraes, Meton Soares de Alencar Filho, Jacques Gabriel Álvares Horta, Déborah Campos Oliveira, Emerson Boschi, Rafael Lessa Costa, Glauco Adrieno Westphal, Juliano Ramos, Fábio Holanda Lacerda, Conrado Roberto Hoffmann Filho, Bruno Valle Pinheiro, Leonardo Bugarin de Andrade Neumamm, Mário Roberto Rezende Guimarães Júnior, Davi Tamamaru de Souza, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Louis Nakayama Ohe, Daniel Almeida Schettini, Marlus Muri Thompson, Maria Cristina França de Oliveira, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Karina L Negrelli, Renato H N Santos, Lucas Damiani, Rodrigo M Gurgel, Samara P C Gomes, Lucas M Lima, Tamiris A Miranda, Ligia N Laranjeira, Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros E Silva, Flávia R Machado, Mark Fitzgerald, Anna Bosse, Joe Marion, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro Carvalho, Laurent Brochard, Roger J Lewis, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti
{"title":"急性呼吸衰竭患者的高流量鼻吸氧与无创通气:RENOVATE随机临床试验","authors":"Israel S Maia, Letícia Kawano-Dourado, Lucas Tramujas, Neymar Elias de Oliveira, Rafael Naoki Souza, Dhaisi Faustino Signorini, Mariangela Pimentel Pincelli, Cássio Luis Zandonai, Regiane Tamires Blasius, Fabrício Freires, Vanessa Marques Ferreira, Marcelo Luz Pereira Romano, Mieko Claudia Miura, Caroline Maschio de Censo, Eliana Bernadete Caser, Betania Silva, Daniela Correia Santos Bonomo, Jussara Alencar Arraes, Meton Soares de Alencar Filho, Jacques Gabriel Álvares Horta, Déborah Campos Oliveira, Emerson Boschi, Rafael Lessa Costa, Glauco Adrieno Westphal, Juliano Ramos, Fábio Holanda Lacerda, Conrado Roberto Hoffmann Filho, Bruno Valle Pinheiro, Leonardo Bugarin de Andrade Neumamm, Mário Roberto Rezende Guimarães Júnior, Davi Tamamaru de Souza, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Louis Nakayama Ohe, Daniel Almeida Schettini, Marlus Muri Thompson, Maria Cristina França de Oliveira, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Karina L Negrelli, Renato H N Santos, Lucas Damiani, Rodrigo M Gurgel, Samara P C Gomes, Lucas M Lima, Tamiris A Miranda, Ligia N Laranjeira, Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros E Silva, Flávia R Machado, Mark Fitzgerald, Anna Bosse, Joe Marion, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro Carvalho, Laurent Brochard, Roger J Lewis, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.26244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) are commonly used respiratory support therapies for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether HFNO is noninferior to NIV on the rates of endotracheal intubation or death at 7 days in 5 patient groups with ARF.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This noninferiority, randomized clinical trial enrolled hospitalized adults (aged ≥18 years; classified as 5 patient groups with ARF: nonimmunocompromised with hypoxemia, immunocompromised with hypoxemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] exacerbation with respiratory acidosis, acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema [ACPE], or hypoxemic COVID-19, which was added as a separate group on June 26, 2023) at 33 hospitals in Brazil between November 2019 and November 2023 (final follow-up: April 26, 2024).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>High-flow nasal oxygen (n = 883) or NIV (n = 883).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation or death within 7 days assessed using a bayesian hierarchical model with dynamic borrowing across patient groups. Noninferiority was defined by a posterior probability of 0.992 or greater for an odds ratio (OR) less than 1.55.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1800 patients, 1766 completed the study (mean age, 64 [SD, 17] years; 707 [40%] were women). The primary outcome of endotracheal intubation or death at 7 days occurred in 39% (344/883) in the HFNO group vs 38% (336/883) in the NIV group. In the immunocompromised with hypoxemia patient group, the primary outcome occurred in 57.1% (16/28) in the HFNO group vs 36.4% (8/22) in the NIV group; enrollment was stopped for futility (final OR, 1.07; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.81-1.39; noninferiority posterior probability [NPP], 0.989). In the nonimmunocompromised with hypoxemia group, the primary outcome occurred in 32.5% (81/249) in the HFNO group vs 33.1% (78/236) in the NIV group (OR, 1.02 [95% CrI, 0.81-1.26]; NPP, 0.999). In the ACPE group, the primary outcome occurred in 10.3% (14/136) in the HFNO group vs 21.3% (29/136) in the NIV group (OR, 0.97 [95% CrI, 0.73-1.23]; NPP, 0.997). In the hypoxemic COVID-19 group, the primary outcome occurred in 51.3% (223/435) in the HFNO group vs 47.0% (210/447) in the NIV group (OR, 1.13 [95% CrI, 0.94-1.38]; NPP, 0.997). In the COPD exacerbation with respiratory acidosis group, the primary outcome occurred in 28.6% (10/35) in the HFNO group vs 26.2% (11/42) in the NIV group (OR, 1.05 [95% CrI, 0.79-1.36]; NPP, 0.992). However, a post hoc analysis without dynamic borrowing across the 5 ARF patient groups revealed some qualitatively different results in patients with COPD, immunocompromised patients, and patients with ACPE. The incidence of serious adverse events was similar (9.4% of patients in HFNO group vs 9.9% in NIV group).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Compared with NIV, HFNO met prespecified criteria for noninferiority for the primary outcome of endotracheal intubation or death within 7 days in 4 of the 5 patient groups with ARF. However, the small sample sizes in some patient groups and the sensitivity of the findings to the choice of analysis model suggests the need for further study in patients with COPD, immunocompromised patients, and patients with ACPE.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03643939.</p>","PeriodicalId":54909,"journal":{"name":"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"875-890"},"PeriodicalIF":63.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-Flow Nasal Oxygen vs Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure: The RENOVATE Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Israel S Maia, Letícia Kawano-Dourado, Lucas Tramujas, Neymar Elias de Oliveira, Rafael Naoki Souza, Dhaisi Faustino Signorini, Mariangela Pimentel Pincelli, Cássio Luis Zandonai, Regiane Tamires Blasius, Fabrício Freires, Vanessa Marques Ferreira, Marcelo Luz Pereira Romano, Mieko Claudia Miura, Caroline Maschio de Censo, Eliana Bernadete Caser, Betania Silva, Daniela Correia Santos Bonomo, Jussara Alencar Arraes, Meton Soares de Alencar Filho, Jacques Gabriel Álvares Horta, Déborah Campos Oliveira, Emerson Boschi, Rafael Lessa Costa, Glauco Adrieno Westphal, Juliano Ramos, Fábio Holanda Lacerda, Conrado Roberto Hoffmann Filho, Bruno Valle Pinheiro, Leonardo Bugarin de Andrade Neumamm, Mário Roberto Rezende Guimarães Júnior, Davi Tamamaru de Souza, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Louis Nakayama Ohe, Daniel Almeida Schettini, Marlus Muri Thompson, Maria Cristina França de Oliveira, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Karina L Negrelli, Renato H N Santos, Lucas Damiani, Rodrigo M Gurgel, Samara P C Gomes, Lucas M Lima, Tamiris A Miranda, Ligia N Laranjeira, Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros E Silva, Flávia R Machado, Mark Fitzgerald, Anna Bosse, Joe Marion, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro Carvalho, Laurent Brochard, Roger J Lewis, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jama.2024.26244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) are commonly used respiratory support therapies for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether HFNO is noninferior to NIV on the rates of endotracheal intubation or death at 7 days in 5 patient groups with ARF.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This noninferiority, randomized clinical trial enrolled hospitalized adults (aged ≥18 years; classified as 5 patient groups with ARF: nonimmunocompromised with hypoxemia, immunocompromised with hypoxemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] exacerbation with respiratory acidosis, acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema [ACPE], or hypoxemic COVID-19, which was added as a separate group on June 26, 2023) at 33 hospitals in Brazil between November 2019 and November 2023 (final follow-up: April 26, 2024).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>High-flow nasal oxygen (n = 883) or NIV (n = 883).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation or death within 7 days assessed using a bayesian hierarchical model with dynamic borrowing across patient groups. Noninferiority was defined by a posterior probability of 0.992 or greater for an odds ratio (OR) less than 1.55.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1800 patients, 1766 completed the study (mean age, 64 [SD, 17] years; 707 [40%] were women). The primary outcome of endotracheal intubation or death at 7 days occurred in 39% (344/883) in the HFNO group vs 38% (336/883) in the NIV group. In the immunocompromised with hypoxemia patient group, the primary outcome occurred in 57.1% (16/28) in the HFNO group vs 36.4% (8/22) in the NIV group; enrollment was stopped for futility (final OR, 1.07; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.81-1.39; noninferiority posterior probability [NPP], 0.989). In the nonimmunocompromised with hypoxemia group, the primary outcome occurred in 32.5% (81/249) in the HFNO group vs 33.1% (78/236) in the NIV group (OR, 1.02 [95% CrI, 0.81-1.26]; NPP, 0.999). In the ACPE group, the primary outcome occurred in 10.3% (14/136) in the HFNO group vs 21.3% (29/136) in the NIV group (OR, 0.97 [95% CrI, 0.73-1.23]; NPP, 0.997). In the hypoxemic COVID-19 group, the primary outcome occurred in 51.3% (223/435) in the HFNO group vs 47.0% (210/447) in the NIV group (OR, 1.13 [95% CrI, 0.94-1.38]; NPP, 0.997). In the COPD exacerbation with respiratory acidosis group, the primary outcome occurred in 28.6% (10/35) in the HFNO group vs 26.2% (11/42) in the NIV group (OR, 1.05 [95% CrI, 0.79-1.36]; NPP, 0.992). However, a post hoc analysis without dynamic borrowing across the 5 ARF patient groups revealed some qualitatively different results in patients with COPD, immunocompromised patients, and patients with ACPE. The incidence of serious adverse events was similar (9.4% of patients in HFNO group vs 9.9% in NIV group).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Compared with NIV, HFNO met prespecified criteria for noninferiority for the primary outcome of endotracheal intubation or death within 7 days in 4 of the 5 patient groups with ARF. However, the small sample sizes in some patient groups and the sensitivity of the findings to the choice of analysis model suggests the need for further study in patients with COPD, immunocompromised patients, and patients with ACPE.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03643939.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"875-890\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":63.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897836/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.26244\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.26244","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:高流量鼻吸氧(HFNO)和无创通气(NIV)是急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)患者常用的呼吸支持疗法。目的:评价HFNO在5组ARF患者7天内气管插管率和死亡率方面是否优于NIV。设计、环境和参与者:这项非劣效性随机临床试验纳入住院成人(年龄≥18岁;将2019年11月至2023年11月(最终随访时间:2024年4月26日)巴西33家医院的ARF患者分为5组:低氧血症非免疫功能低下、低氧血症免疫功能低下、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)加重伴呼吸性酸中毒、急性心源性肺水肿(ACPE)或低氧血症COVID-19(于2023年6月26日添加为单独组)。干预措施:高流量鼻吸氧(n = 883)或NIV (n = 883)。主要结局和措施:主要结局是气管插管或7天内死亡,采用贝叶斯分层模型评估,并在患者组间动态借用。当比值比(or)小于1.55时,后验概率为0.992或更大。结果:1800例患者中,1766例完成了研究(平均年龄64 [SD, 17]岁;女性707人(40%)。HFNO组7天内气管插管或死亡的主要结局发生率为39% (344/883),NIV组为38%(336/883)。在免疫功能低下伴低氧血症患者组中,HFNO组的主要结局发生率为57.1% (16/28),NIV组为36.4% (8/22);因无效停止入组(最终OR为1.07;95%可信区间[CrI], 0.81-1.39;非劣后验概率[NPP], 0.989)。在非免疫功能低下伴低氧血症组中,HFNO组的主要结局发生率为32.5% (81/249),NIV组为33.1% (78/236)(OR, 1.02 [95% CrI, 0.81-1.26];NPP, 0.999)。在ACPE组中,HFNO组的主要结局发生率为10.3%(14/136),而NIV组为21.3% (29/136)(OR, 0.97 [95% CrI, 0.73-1.23];NPP, 0.997)。在低氧血症COVID-19组中,HFNO组的主要结局发生率为51.3%(223/435),而NIV组的主要结局发生率为47.0% (210/447)(OR, 1.13 [95% CrI, 0.94-1.38];NPP, 0.997)。在慢性阻塞性肺病加重合并呼吸性酸中毒组中,HFNO组的主要结局发生率为28.6%(10/35),而NIV组的主要结局发生率为26.2% (11/42)(OR, 1.05 [95% CrI, 0.79-1.36];NPP, 0.992)。然而,在没有动态借用的情况下,对5组ARF患者进行的事后分析显示,COPD患者、免疫功能低下患者和ACPE患者的结果存在一些质的差异。严重不良事件发生率相似(HFNO组为9.4%,NIV组为9.9%)。结论和相关性:与NIV相比,HFNO在5组ARF患者中有4组的主要结局为气管插管或7天内死亡,符合预先设定的非劣效性标准。然而,在一些患者组中样本量较小,并且研究结果对分析模型选择的敏感性表明,需要对COPD患者、免疫功能低下患者和ACPE患者进行进一步研究。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03643939。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High-Flow Nasal Oxygen vs Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure: The RENOVATE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) are commonly used respiratory support therapies for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF).

Objective: To assess whether HFNO is noninferior to NIV on the rates of endotracheal intubation or death at 7 days in 5 patient groups with ARF.

Design, setting, and participants: This noninferiority, randomized clinical trial enrolled hospitalized adults (aged ≥18 years; classified as 5 patient groups with ARF: nonimmunocompromised with hypoxemia, immunocompromised with hypoxemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] exacerbation with respiratory acidosis, acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema [ACPE], or hypoxemic COVID-19, which was added as a separate group on June 26, 2023) at 33 hospitals in Brazil between November 2019 and November 2023 (final follow-up: April 26, 2024).

Interventions: High-flow nasal oxygen (n = 883) or NIV (n = 883).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation or death within 7 days assessed using a bayesian hierarchical model with dynamic borrowing across patient groups. Noninferiority was defined by a posterior probability of 0.992 or greater for an odds ratio (OR) less than 1.55.

Results: Among 1800 patients, 1766 completed the study (mean age, 64 [SD, 17] years; 707 [40%] were women). The primary outcome of endotracheal intubation or death at 7 days occurred in 39% (344/883) in the HFNO group vs 38% (336/883) in the NIV group. In the immunocompromised with hypoxemia patient group, the primary outcome occurred in 57.1% (16/28) in the HFNO group vs 36.4% (8/22) in the NIV group; enrollment was stopped for futility (final OR, 1.07; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.81-1.39; noninferiority posterior probability [NPP], 0.989). In the nonimmunocompromised with hypoxemia group, the primary outcome occurred in 32.5% (81/249) in the HFNO group vs 33.1% (78/236) in the NIV group (OR, 1.02 [95% CrI, 0.81-1.26]; NPP, 0.999). In the ACPE group, the primary outcome occurred in 10.3% (14/136) in the HFNO group vs 21.3% (29/136) in the NIV group (OR, 0.97 [95% CrI, 0.73-1.23]; NPP, 0.997). In the hypoxemic COVID-19 group, the primary outcome occurred in 51.3% (223/435) in the HFNO group vs 47.0% (210/447) in the NIV group (OR, 1.13 [95% CrI, 0.94-1.38]; NPP, 0.997). In the COPD exacerbation with respiratory acidosis group, the primary outcome occurred in 28.6% (10/35) in the HFNO group vs 26.2% (11/42) in the NIV group (OR, 1.05 [95% CrI, 0.79-1.36]; NPP, 0.992). However, a post hoc analysis without dynamic borrowing across the 5 ARF patient groups revealed some qualitatively different results in patients with COPD, immunocompromised patients, and patients with ACPE. The incidence of serious adverse events was similar (9.4% of patients in HFNO group vs 9.9% in NIV group).

Conclusions and relevance: Compared with NIV, HFNO met prespecified criteria for noninferiority for the primary outcome of endotracheal intubation or death within 7 days in 4 of the 5 patient groups with ARF. However, the small sample sizes in some patient groups and the sensitivity of the findings to the choice of analysis model suggests the need for further study in patients with COPD, immunocompromised patients, and patients with ACPE.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03643939.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
48.20
自引率
0.90%
发文量
1569
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) is an international peer-reviewed general medical journal. It has been published continuously since 1883. JAMA is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信