评估体表和肌内肌电信号之间的关系:对皮下脂肪厚度的影响。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Journal of Applied Biomechanics Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Print Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1123/jab.2024-0101
Matthew S Russell, Sam S Vasilounis, Daniel Desroches, Talia Alenabi, Janessa D M Drake, Jaclyn N Chopp-Hurley
{"title":"评估体表和肌内肌电信号之间的关系:对皮下脂肪厚度的影响。","authors":"Matthew S Russell, Sam S Vasilounis, Daniel Desroches, Talia Alenabi, Janessa D M Drake, Jaclyn N Chopp-Hurley","doi":"10.1123/jab.2024-0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intramuscular (iEMG) and surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals have been compared previously using predictive regression equations, finite element modeling, and correlation and cross-correlation analyses. Although subcutaneous fat thickness (SCFT) has been identified as a primary source of sEMG signal amplitude attenuation and low-pass filter equivalence, few studies have explored the potential effect of SCFT on sEMG and iEMG signal characteristics. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between normalized submaximal iEMG and sEMG signal amplitudes collected from 4 muscles (rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, infraspinatus, and erector spinae) and determine whether SCFT explains more variance in this relationship. The effect of sex was also explored. Linear regression models demonstrated that the relationship between sEMG and iEMG was highly variable across the muscles examined (adjusted coefficient of determination [Adj R2] = .02-.74). SCFT improved the model fit for vastus lateralis, although this relationship only emerged with the inclusion of sex as a covariate. Thus, this research suggests that SCFT is not a prominent factor affecting the linearity between sEMG and iEMG. Researchers should investigate other parameters that may affect the linearity between sEMG and iEMG signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":54883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"47-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Relationship Between Surface and Intramuscular-Based Electromyography Signals: Implications of Subcutaneous Fat Thickness.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew S Russell, Sam S Vasilounis, Daniel Desroches, Talia Alenabi, Janessa D M Drake, Jaclyn N Chopp-Hurley\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jab.2024-0101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intramuscular (iEMG) and surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals have been compared previously using predictive regression equations, finite element modeling, and correlation and cross-correlation analyses. Although subcutaneous fat thickness (SCFT) has been identified as a primary source of sEMG signal amplitude attenuation and low-pass filter equivalence, few studies have explored the potential effect of SCFT on sEMG and iEMG signal characteristics. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between normalized submaximal iEMG and sEMG signal amplitudes collected from 4 muscles (rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, infraspinatus, and erector spinae) and determine whether SCFT explains more variance in this relationship. The effect of sex was also explored. Linear regression models demonstrated that the relationship between sEMG and iEMG was highly variable across the muscles examined (adjusted coefficient of determination [Adj R2] = .02-.74). SCFT improved the model fit for vastus lateralis, although this relationship only emerged with the inclusion of sex as a covariate. Thus, this research suggests that SCFT is not a prominent factor affecting the linearity between sEMG and iEMG. Researchers should investigate other parameters that may affect the linearity between sEMG and iEMG signals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"47-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2024-0101\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2024-0101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肌内(iEMG)和表面肌电图(sEMG)信号之前已经使用预测回归方程、有限元建模、相关和相互关联分析进行了比较。虽然皮下脂肪厚度(SCFT)已被确定为表面肌电信号振幅衰减和低通滤波器等效的主要来源,但很少有研究探讨SCFT对表面肌电信号和iEMG信号特征的潜在影响。本研究的目的是研究从4块肌肉(股直肌、股外侧肌、冈下肌和竖脊肌)收集的归一化iEMG亚最大值与表面肌电信号振幅之间的关系,并确定SCFT是否解释了这种关系的更多差异。研究还探讨了性别的影响。线性回归模型显示,肌电图和肌电图之间的关系在检查的肌肉中是高度可变的(调整后的决定系数[Adj R2] = 0.02 - 0.74)。SCFT改进了模型对股外侧肌的拟合,尽管这种关系仅在将性别作为协变量纳入时才出现。因此,本研究表明,SCFT并不是影响表面肌电信号与iEMG线性关系的重要因素。研究人员应该研究其他可能影响表面肌电信号和眼肌电信号之间线性关系的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Relationship Between Surface and Intramuscular-Based Electromyography Signals: Implications of Subcutaneous Fat Thickness.

Intramuscular (iEMG) and surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals have been compared previously using predictive regression equations, finite element modeling, and correlation and cross-correlation analyses. Although subcutaneous fat thickness (SCFT) has been identified as a primary source of sEMG signal amplitude attenuation and low-pass filter equivalence, few studies have explored the potential effect of SCFT on sEMG and iEMG signal characteristics. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between normalized submaximal iEMG and sEMG signal amplitudes collected from 4 muscles (rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, infraspinatus, and erector spinae) and determine whether SCFT explains more variance in this relationship. The effect of sex was also explored. Linear regression models demonstrated that the relationship between sEMG and iEMG was highly variable across the muscles examined (adjusted coefficient of determination [Adj R2] = .02-.74). SCFT improved the model fit for vastus lateralis, although this relationship only emerged with the inclusion of sex as a covariate. Thus, this research suggests that SCFT is not a prominent factor affecting the linearity between sEMG and iEMG. Researchers should investigate other parameters that may affect the linearity between sEMG and iEMG signals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Journal of Applied Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Applied Biomechanics (JAB) is to disseminate the highest quality peer-reviewed studies that utilize biomechanical strategies to advance the study of human movement. Areas of interest include clinical biomechanics, gait and posture mechanics, musculoskeletal and neuromuscular biomechanics, sport mechanics, and biomechanical modeling. Studies of sport performance that explicitly generalize to broader activities, contribute substantially to fundamental understanding of human motion, or are in a sport that enjoys wide participation, are welcome. Also within the scope of JAB are studies using biomechanical strategies to investigate the structure, control, function, and state (health and disease) of animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信