以家庭为基础的健康促进干预对既往GDM妇女的有效性:Face-it随机对照试验

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Karoline Kragelund Nielsen, Inger Katrine Dahl-Petersen, Dorte Møller Jensen, Peter Damm, Per Ovesen, Elisabeth R Mathiesen, Ulla Kampmann, Christina Anne Vinter, Sine Knorr, Lise Lotte Andersen, Emma Davidsen, Nanna Husted Jensen, Jori Aalders, Maja Thøgersen, Anne Timm, Henrik Støvring, Helle Terkildsen Maindal
{"title":"以家庭为基础的健康促进干预对既往GDM妇女的有效性:Face-it随机对照试验","authors":"Karoline Kragelund Nielsen, Inger Katrine Dahl-Petersen, Dorte Møller Jensen, Peter Damm, Per Ovesen, Elisabeth R Mathiesen, Ulla Kampmann, Christina Anne Vinter, Sine Knorr, Lise Lotte Andersen, Emma Davidsen, Nanna Husted Jensen, Jori Aalders, Maja Thøgersen, Anne Timm, Henrik Støvring, Helle Terkildsen Maindal","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgae856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases the risk of future type 2 diabetes (T2DM), but effective and feasible interventions to reduce this risk are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of a family-based health promotion intervention on T2DM risk factors and quality of life among women with recent GDM.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter, parallel, open-label randomized controlled trial with 2:1 allocation ratio.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three sites in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Women diagnosed with GDM.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>The intervention consisted of (1) home visits with tailored family-based counseling (2) digital health coaching, and (3) structured cross-sectoral communication.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes were body mass index (BMI) and quality of life [12-Item Short-Form mental component score (SF12 MCS)] 1 year after delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomized 277 women to the intervention (n = 184) or usual care group (n = 93). The intervention did not result in significantly lower BMI [-0.44 kg/m2; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.98 to 0.11] or higher SF12 MCS (0.06; 95% CI -2.15 to 2.27) compared to the usual care group. A prespecified post hoc analysis demonstrated a reduced BMI in the intervention group among women with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (-0.86 kg/m2; 95% CI -1.58 to -0.14).Analyses of secondary and tertiary outcomes indicated significantly lower 2-hour insulin (-94.3 pmmol/L; 95% CI -167.9 to -20.6) and triglycerides (-0.18 mmol/L; 95% CI -0.30 to -0.05) levels, and odds of fasting plasma glucose ≥6·1 mmol/L (odds ratio 0.33; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.91) in the intervention group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intervention did not result in lower BMI or increased quality of life but seemingly reduced other risk factors and lowered BMI in the subgroup of overweight women.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"e2456-e2470"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of a Family-based Health Promotion Intervention for Women With Prior GDM: The Face-It RCT.\",\"authors\":\"Karoline Kragelund Nielsen, Inger Katrine Dahl-Petersen, Dorte Møller Jensen, Peter Damm, Per Ovesen, Elisabeth R Mathiesen, Ulla Kampmann, Christina Anne Vinter, Sine Knorr, Lise Lotte Andersen, Emma Davidsen, Nanna Husted Jensen, Jori Aalders, Maja Thøgersen, Anne Timm, Henrik Støvring, Helle Terkildsen Maindal\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/clinem/dgae856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases the risk of future type 2 diabetes (T2DM), but effective and feasible interventions to reduce this risk are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of a family-based health promotion intervention on T2DM risk factors and quality of life among women with recent GDM.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter, parallel, open-label randomized controlled trial with 2:1 allocation ratio.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three sites in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Women diagnosed with GDM.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>The intervention consisted of (1) home visits with tailored family-based counseling (2) digital health coaching, and (3) structured cross-sectoral communication.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes were body mass index (BMI) and quality of life [12-Item Short-Form mental component score (SF12 MCS)] 1 year after delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomized 277 women to the intervention (n = 184) or usual care group (n = 93). The intervention did not result in significantly lower BMI [-0.44 kg/m2; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.98 to 0.11] or higher SF12 MCS (0.06; 95% CI -2.15 to 2.27) compared to the usual care group. A prespecified post hoc analysis demonstrated a reduced BMI in the intervention group among women with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (-0.86 kg/m2; 95% CI -1.58 to -0.14).Analyses of secondary and tertiary outcomes indicated significantly lower 2-hour insulin (-94.3 pmmol/L; 95% CI -167.9 to -20.6) and triglycerides (-0.18 mmol/L; 95% CI -0.30 to -0.05) levels, and odds of fasting plasma glucose ≥6·1 mmol/L (odds ratio 0.33; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.91) in the intervention group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intervention did not result in lower BMI or increased quality of life but seemingly reduced other risk factors and lowered BMI in the subgroup of overweight women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e2456-e2470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261077/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae856\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae856","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)增加未来2型糖尿病(T2DM)的风险,但缺乏有效和可行的干预措施来降低这种风险。目的:评价以家庭为基础的健康促进干预对近期GDM妇女T2DM危险因素和生活质量的影响。设计:多中心,平行,开放标签随机对照试验,2:1分配比例。背景:丹麦的三个地点。干预措施:干预措施包括:(i)家访,提供量身定制的基于家庭的咨询;(ii)数字健康指导;(iii)有组织的跨部门沟通。主要结局指标:主要结局指标为分娩后1年的体重指数(BMI)和生活质量(SF12 MCS)。结果:我们将277名妇女随机分为干预组(n=184)和常规护理组(n=93)。干预并未导致BMI显著降低(-0.44 kg/m2;95%CI -0.98至0.11)或更高SF12 MCS (0.06;95%CI -2.15 ~ 2.27),与常规护理组比较。预先指定的事后分析表明,干预组BMI≥25 kg/m2的女性BMI降低(-0.86 kg/m2;(-1.58至-0.14))。二级和三级结局分析显示,2小时胰岛素显著降低(-94.3 pmmol/L;95%CI -167.9至-20.6)和甘油三酯(-0.18 mmol/L;95%CI为-0.30 ~ -0.05),空腹血糖≥6.1 mmol/L (OR 0.33;95%CI 0.12 ~ 0.91)。结论:干预并没有降低BMI或提高生活质量,但似乎降低了其他危险因素,并降低了超重妇女亚组的BMI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of a Family-based Health Promotion Intervention for Women With Prior GDM: The Face-It RCT.

Context: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases the risk of future type 2 diabetes (T2DM), but effective and feasible interventions to reduce this risk are lacking.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a family-based health promotion intervention on T2DM risk factors and quality of life among women with recent GDM.

Design: Multicenter, parallel, open-label randomized controlled trial with 2:1 allocation ratio.

Setting: Three sites in Denmark.

Participants: Women diagnosed with GDM.

Intervention(s): The intervention consisted of (1) home visits with tailored family-based counseling (2) digital health coaching, and (3) structured cross-sectoral communication.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were body mass index (BMI) and quality of life [12-Item Short-Form mental component score (SF12 MCS)] 1 year after delivery.

Results: We randomized 277 women to the intervention (n = 184) or usual care group (n = 93). The intervention did not result in significantly lower BMI [-0.44 kg/m2; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.98 to 0.11] or higher SF12 MCS (0.06; 95% CI -2.15 to 2.27) compared to the usual care group. A prespecified post hoc analysis demonstrated a reduced BMI in the intervention group among women with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (-0.86 kg/m2; 95% CI -1.58 to -0.14).Analyses of secondary and tertiary outcomes indicated significantly lower 2-hour insulin (-94.3 pmmol/L; 95% CI -167.9 to -20.6) and triglycerides (-0.18 mmol/L; 95% CI -0.30 to -0.05) levels, and odds of fasting plasma glucose ≥6·1 mmol/L (odds ratio 0.33; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.91) in the intervention group.

Conclusion: The intervention did not result in lower BMI or increased quality of life but seemingly reduced other risk factors and lowered BMI in the subgroup of overweight women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信