Gulnura Sulaimanova, Yui Yamaoka, Inis Jane Bardella, Takeo Fujiwara
{"title":"农村地区孕妇遭受家庭暴力的普遍性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Gulnura Sulaimanova, Yui Yamaoka, Inis Jane Bardella, Takeo Fujiwara","doi":"10.1136/jech-2023-220862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many studies have demonstrated that pregnant women living in rural areas are more likely to experience domestic violence (DV). Systematic reviews on the prevalence and risk factors of DV among pregnant women have been conducted mainly in urban areas. Thus, there has been no determination of the global prevalence of DV among rural pregnant women. The objective of this study is to assess the prevalence and types of DV among rural pregnant women globally using systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis expanded checklist for 2020 was employed. The Condition-Context-Population framework was used to determine the inclusion criteria. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Scopus databases were searched for published articles through January 2023. Pooled prevalence and types of DV in rural pregnant women were assessed using the random effect model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DV against rural pregnant women was prevalent at 33.4% (95% CI 20.8 to 47.9%). Psychological violence was the most common with a prevalence of 34.2%, followed by physical violence (14.1%) and sexual violence (13.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One-third of pregnant women in rural areas are victims of DV. In rural pregnant women, the prevalence of DV is higher than overall global estimates. Policymakers, healthcare professionals and researchers must prioritise assessment and prevention of DV against pregnant women who reside in rural areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of domestic violence against pregnant women living in rural areas: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gulnura Sulaimanova, Yui Yamaoka, Inis Jane Bardella, Takeo Fujiwara\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jech-2023-220862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many studies have demonstrated that pregnant women living in rural areas are more likely to experience domestic violence (DV). Systematic reviews on the prevalence and risk factors of DV among pregnant women have been conducted mainly in urban areas. Thus, there has been no determination of the global prevalence of DV among rural pregnant women. The objective of this study is to assess the prevalence and types of DV among rural pregnant women globally using systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis expanded checklist for 2020 was employed. The Condition-Context-Population framework was used to determine the inclusion criteria. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Scopus databases were searched for published articles through January 2023. Pooled prevalence and types of DV in rural pregnant women were assessed using the random effect model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DV against rural pregnant women was prevalent at 33.4% (95% CI 20.8 to 47.9%). Psychological violence was the most common with a prevalence of 34.2%, followed by physical violence (14.1%) and sexual violence (13.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One-third of pregnant women in rural areas are victims of DV. In rural pregnant women, the prevalence of DV is higher than overall global estimates. Policymakers, healthcare professionals and researchers must prioritise assessment and prevention of DV against pregnant women who reside in rural areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2023-220862\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2023-220862","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:许多研究表明,生活在农村地区的孕妇更容易遭受家庭暴力。主要在城市地区对孕妇中家庭暴力的流行情况和危险因素进行了系统审查。因此,目前还没有确定农村孕妇中DV的全球流行率。本研究的目的是通过系统回顾和荟萃分析来评估全球农村孕妇DV的患病率和类型。方法:采用2020年系统评价和元分析首选报告项目扩展清单。采用条件-环境-人口框架确定纳入标准。15项研究符合纳入标准。检索PubMed、Web of Science、护理和相关健康文献累积索引和Scopus数据库,检索截至2023年1月发表的文章。采用随机效应模型评估农村孕妇总流行率和DV类型。结果:农村孕妇DV患病率为33.4% (95% CI为20.8 ~ 47.9%)。心理暴力最为常见,发生率为34.2%,其次是身体暴力(14.1%)和性暴力(13.5%)。结论:农村地区三分之一的孕妇是家暴受害者。在农村孕妇中,DV的流行率高于全球总体估计。决策者、卫生保健专业人员和研究人员必须优先评估和预防对农村地区孕妇的家暴。
Prevalence of domestic violence against pregnant women living in rural areas: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Many studies have demonstrated that pregnant women living in rural areas are more likely to experience domestic violence (DV). Systematic reviews on the prevalence and risk factors of DV among pregnant women have been conducted mainly in urban areas. Thus, there has been no determination of the global prevalence of DV among rural pregnant women. The objective of this study is to assess the prevalence and types of DV among rural pregnant women globally using systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis expanded checklist for 2020 was employed. The Condition-Context-Population framework was used to determine the inclusion criteria. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Scopus databases were searched for published articles through January 2023. Pooled prevalence and types of DV in rural pregnant women were assessed using the random effect model.
Results: DV against rural pregnant women was prevalent at 33.4% (95% CI 20.8 to 47.9%). Psychological violence was the most common with a prevalence of 34.2%, followed by physical violence (14.1%) and sexual violence (13.5%).
Conclusion: One-third of pregnant women in rural areas are victims of DV. In rural pregnant women, the prevalence of DV is higher than overall global estimates. Policymakers, healthcare professionals and researchers must prioritise assessment and prevention of DV against pregnant women who reside in rural areas.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health is a leading international journal devoted to publication of original research and reviews covering applied, methodological and theoretical issues with emphasis on studies using multidisciplinary or integrative approaches. The journal aims to improve epidemiological knowledge and ultimately health worldwide.