坚持底线——危机支持者的心理健康、压力源和应对。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Jayden Sercombe, Emma K Devine, Mark Deady, Katherine L Mills
{"title":"坚持底线——危机支持者的心理健康、压力源和应对。","authors":"Jayden Sercombe, Emma K Devine, Mark Deady, Katherine L Mills","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Crisis supporters can experience numerous stressors in their role that can impact their own mental well-being. The area remains underexplored in research, particularly relating to substance use, and new trends in the role such as working remotely or the impact of providing chat-based support. <i>Aims:</i> This study identifies crisis support-related stressors, as well as levels of mental well-being and substance use, and factors associated with mental well-being. <i>Method:</i> Participants (<i>n</i> = 422) were recruited from four leading crisis support services and via social media advertising. They responded to an online survey, assessing demographics, stressors, mental well-being (compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, and psychological distress), substance use, and coping styles. <i>Results:</i> Findings identified several important stressors (e.g., argumentative callers) and moderate to high rates of compassion fatigue and psychological distress. High levels of compassion satisfaction were reported, and levels of risky substance use were low. Problem-focused coping emerged as a key factor related to positive mental well-being, while emotion-focused, avoidant coping, remote work, and providing chat-based support were linked to negative well-being. <i>Limitations:</i> The study's cross-sectional design and convenience sample limit causal inferences and generalizability. <i>Conclusion:</i> The findings reveal significant stressors and challenges in crisis supporters that require consideration and intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"32-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11793082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Holding the Line - Mental Well-Being, Stressors, and Coping in Crisis Supporters.\",\"authors\":\"Jayden Sercombe, Emma K Devine, Mark Deady, Katherine L Mills\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/0227-5910/a000985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Crisis supporters can experience numerous stressors in their role that can impact their own mental well-being. The area remains underexplored in research, particularly relating to substance use, and new trends in the role such as working remotely or the impact of providing chat-based support. <i>Aims:</i> This study identifies crisis support-related stressors, as well as levels of mental well-being and substance use, and factors associated with mental well-being. <i>Method:</i> Participants (<i>n</i> = 422) were recruited from four leading crisis support services and via social media advertising. They responded to an online survey, assessing demographics, stressors, mental well-being (compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, and psychological distress), substance use, and coping styles. <i>Results:</i> Findings identified several important stressors (e.g., argumentative callers) and moderate to high rates of compassion fatigue and psychological distress. High levels of compassion satisfaction were reported, and levels of risky substance use were low. Problem-focused coping emerged as a key factor related to positive mental well-being, while emotion-focused, avoidant coping, remote work, and providing chat-based support were linked to negative well-being. <i>Limitations:</i> The study's cross-sectional design and convenience sample limit causal inferences and generalizability. <i>Conclusion:</i> The findings reveal significant stressors and challenges in crisis supporters that require consideration and intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"32-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11793082/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000985\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:危机支持者在他们的角色中会经历许多压力源,这些压力源会影响他们自己的心理健康。这一领域的研究仍未得到充分探索,特别是与药物使用有关的研究,以及远程工作或提供聊天支持的影响等角色的新趋势。目的:本研究确定了危机支持相关的压力源,以及心理健康和物质使用水平,以及与心理健康相关的因素。方法:参与者(n = 422)从四个领先的危机支持服务和通过社交媒体广告招募。他们回答了一项在线调查,评估人口统计、压力源、心理健康(同情疲劳、同情满意度和心理困扰)、物质使用和应对方式。结果:研究结果确定了几个重要的压力源(例如,好争论的打电话者)和中高比例的同情疲劳和心理困扰。据报道,同情满意度很高,危险物质使用水平很低。以问题为中心的应对是与积极心理健康相关的关键因素,而以情绪为中心、逃避型应对、远程工作和提供聊天支持与消极心理健康相关。局限性:研究的横断面设计和方便的样本限制了因果推论和推广。结论:研究结果揭示了危机支持者中需要考虑和干预的重要压力源和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Holding the Line - Mental Well-Being, Stressors, and Coping in Crisis Supporters.

Background: Crisis supporters can experience numerous stressors in their role that can impact their own mental well-being. The area remains underexplored in research, particularly relating to substance use, and new trends in the role such as working remotely or the impact of providing chat-based support. Aims: This study identifies crisis support-related stressors, as well as levels of mental well-being and substance use, and factors associated with mental well-being. Method: Participants (n = 422) were recruited from four leading crisis support services and via social media advertising. They responded to an online survey, assessing demographics, stressors, mental well-being (compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, and psychological distress), substance use, and coping styles. Results: Findings identified several important stressors (e.g., argumentative callers) and moderate to high rates of compassion fatigue and psychological distress. High levels of compassion satisfaction were reported, and levels of risky substance use were low. Problem-focused coping emerged as a key factor related to positive mental well-being, while emotion-focused, avoidant coping, remote work, and providing chat-based support were linked to negative well-being. Limitations: The study's cross-sectional design and convenience sample limit causal inferences and generalizability. Conclusion: The findings reveal significant stressors and challenges in crisis supporters that require consideration and intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信