负性症状量表-精神病风险(NSI-PR):最终11项版本的心理计量学验证。

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Gregory P Strauss, Elaine F Walker, Nathan T Carter, Lauren Luther, Vijay A Mittal
{"title":"负性症状量表-精神病风险(NSI-PR):最终11项版本的心理计量学验证。","authors":"Gregory P Strauss, Elaine F Walker, Nathan T Carter, Lauren Luther, Vijay A Mittal","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbae206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypotheses: </strong>The lack of psychometrically validated assessment tools designed specifically to assess negative symptoms in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis represents a significant barrier to the early identification and prevention of psychosis. To address this need, the Negative Symptom Inventory-Psychosis Risk (NSI-PR) was developed based on the iterative, data-driven approach recommended by the National Institute of Mental Health consensus conference on negative symptoms.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This manuscript reports the results of the second study phase that psychometrically validates the final 11-item version of the scale in data collected across 3 sites. A total of 222 participants (144 CHR and 78 clinical help-seeking controls) completed the NSI-PR, 1 week of ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and additional convergent and discriminant validity measures.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Structural analyses replicated the previously reported strong fit for the 5-factor (anhedonia, avolition, asociality, alogia, and blunted affect) and hierarchical structures (2 super-ordinate dimensions and 5 lower-level domains). The 5 domains and 2 dimensions generally demonstrated good internal consistency, temporal stability, and interrater reliability. Convergent validity was demonstrated in relation to the 16-item beta version of the NSI-PR, Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes negative subscale, Global Functioning Scale social and role, and EMA measures. Discriminant validity was supported by low correlations with positive, disorganized, and general psychiatric symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings indicate the final 11-item version of the NSI-PR has sound psychometric properties. The scale, which is designed specifically for CHR individuals, is brief and appropriate for use in research and clinical contexts. Accompanying training materials have been developed to support its use in multisite trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"1380-1389"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Negative Symptom Inventory-Psychosis Risk (NSI-PR): Psychometric Validation of the Final 11-Item Version.\",\"authors\":\"Gregory P Strauss, Elaine F Walker, Nathan T Carter, Lauren Luther, Vijay A Mittal\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/schbul/sbae206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and hypotheses: </strong>The lack of psychometrically validated assessment tools designed specifically to assess negative symptoms in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis represents a significant barrier to the early identification and prevention of psychosis. To address this need, the Negative Symptom Inventory-Psychosis Risk (NSI-PR) was developed based on the iterative, data-driven approach recommended by the National Institute of Mental Health consensus conference on negative symptoms.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This manuscript reports the results of the second study phase that psychometrically validates the final 11-item version of the scale in data collected across 3 sites. A total of 222 participants (144 CHR and 78 clinical help-seeking controls) completed the NSI-PR, 1 week of ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and additional convergent and discriminant validity measures.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Structural analyses replicated the previously reported strong fit for the 5-factor (anhedonia, avolition, asociality, alogia, and blunted affect) and hierarchical structures (2 super-ordinate dimensions and 5 lower-level domains). The 5 domains and 2 dimensions generally demonstrated good internal consistency, temporal stability, and interrater reliability. Convergent validity was demonstrated in relation to the 16-item beta version of the NSI-PR, Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes negative subscale, Global Functioning Scale social and role, and EMA measures. Discriminant validity was supported by low correlations with positive, disorganized, and general psychiatric symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings indicate the final 11-item version of the NSI-PR has sound psychometric properties. The scale, which is designed specifically for CHR individuals, is brief and appropriate for use in research and clinical contexts. Accompanying training materials have been developed to support its use in multisite trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schizophrenia Bulletin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1380-1389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414547/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schizophrenia Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbae206\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbae206","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和假设:缺乏经过心理测量学验证的评估工具,专门用于评估精神病临床高风险(CHR)个体的阴性症状,这是早期识别和预防精神病的一个重大障碍。为了满足这一需求,消极症状清单-精神病风险(NSI-PR)是根据国家精神卫生研究所关于消极症状的共识会议推荐的迭代、数据驱动的方法开发的。研究设计:本文报告了第二阶段研究的结果,该研究从心理测量学上验证了从三个站点收集的数据中最终的11个项目版本的量表。共有222名参与者(144名CHR和78名临床求助对照组)完成了NSI-PR, 1周的生态瞬时评估(EMA),以及额外的收敛效度和判别效度测量。研究结果:结构分析重复了先前报道的5因素(快感缺乏、自发性、社会性、痛症和钝化影响)和层次结构(2个超坐标维度和5个低层次领域)的强拟合。5个域和2个维度总体上表现出良好的内部一致性、时间稳定性和互信度。与NSI-PR的16项测试版、精神病风险综合征负分量量表结构化访谈、整体功能量表社会和角色以及EMA测量相关的趋同效度被证明。判别效度与阳性、紊乱和一般精神症状的相关性较低。结论:研究结果表明NSI-PR的最终11项版本具有良好的心理测量特性。该量表是专门为CHR个人设计的,简短且适用于研究和临床环境。已编写了配套的培训材料,以支持其在多地点试验中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Negative Symptom Inventory-Psychosis Risk (NSI-PR): Psychometric Validation of the Final 11-Item Version.

Background and hypotheses: The lack of psychometrically validated assessment tools designed specifically to assess negative symptoms in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis represents a significant barrier to the early identification and prevention of psychosis. To address this need, the Negative Symptom Inventory-Psychosis Risk (NSI-PR) was developed based on the iterative, data-driven approach recommended by the National Institute of Mental Health consensus conference on negative symptoms.

Study design: This manuscript reports the results of the second study phase that psychometrically validates the final 11-item version of the scale in data collected across 3 sites. A total of 222 participants (144 CHR and 78 clinical help-seeking controls) completed the NSI-PR, 1 week of ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and additional convergent and discriminant validity measures.

Study results: Structural analyses replicated the previously reported strong fit for the 5-factor (anhedonia, avolition, asociality, alogia, and blunted affect) and hierarchical structures (2 super-ordinate dimensions and 5 lower-level domains). The 5 domains and 2 dimensions generally demonstrated good internal consistency, temporal stability, and interrater reliability. Convergent validity was demonstrated in relation to the 16-item beta version of the NSI-PR, Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes negative subscale, Global Functioning Scale social and role, and EMA measures. Discriminant validity was supported by low correlations with positive, disorganized, and general psychiatric symptoms.

Conclusions: Findings indicate the final 11-item version of the NSI-PR has sound psychometric properties. The scale, which is designed specifically for CHR individuals, is brief and appropriate for use in research and clinical contexts. Accompanying training materials have been developed to support its use in multisite trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Schizophrenia Bulletin 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Schizophrenia Bulletin seeks to review recent developments and empirically based hypotheses regarding the etiology and treatment of schizophrenia. We view the field as broad and deep, and will publish new knowledge ranging from the molecular basis to social and cultural factors. We will give new emphasis to translational reports which simultaneously highlight basic neurobiological mechanisms and clinical manifestations. Some of the Bulletin content is invited as special features or manuscripts organized as a theme by special guest editors. Most pages of the Bulletin are devoted to unsolicited manuscripts of high quality that report original data or where we can provide a special venue for a major study or workshop report. Supplement issues are sometimes provided for manuscripts reporting from a recent conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信