条件性疼痛调节的个体差异与下行抗感觉通路内的功能连接有关。

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
PAIN® Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003478
Janet Z Li, Emily P Mills, Natalie R Osborne, Joshua C Cheng, Vaidhehi V Sanmugananthan, Rima El-Sayed, Ariana Besik, Junseok A Kim, Rachael L Bosma, Anton Rogachov, Karen D Davis
{"title":"条件性疼痛调节的个体差异与下行抗感觉通路内的功能连接有关。","authors":"Janet Z Li, Emily P Mills, Natalie R Osborne, Joshua C Cheng, Vaidhehi V Sanmugananthan, Rima El-Sayed, Ariana Besik, Junseok A Kim, Rachael L Bosma, Anton Rogachov, Karen D Davis","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The perception of pain and ability to cope with it varies widely amongst people, which in part could be due to the presence of inhibitory (antinociceptive) or facilitatory (pronociceptive) effects in conditioned pain modulation (CPM). This study examined whether individual differences in CPM reflect functional connectivity (FC) strengths within nodes of the descending antinociceptive pathway (DAP). A heat-based CPM paradigm and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) were used to test the hypothesis that an individual's capacity to exhibit inhibitory CPM (changes in test stimuli [TS] pain due to a conditioning stimulus [CS]) reflects FC of the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC), periaqueductal gray (PAG), and rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). A total of 151 healthy participants (72 men, 79 women) underwent CPM testing and rs-fMRI. Three types of CPM were identified based on the effect of the CS on TS pain: (1) Antinociception: CS reduced TS pain in 45% of participants, (2) No-CPM: CS did not change TS pain in 15% of participants, and (3) Pronociception: CS increased TS pain in 40% of participants. Only the Antinociceptive subgroup exhibited FC between the left sgACC and PAG, right sgACC and PAG, and RVM and PAG. Furthermore, only the Antinociceptive subgroup exhibited a correlation of both left and right sgACC-RVM FC (medium effect sizes) with CPM effect magnitude. Women, compared with men were more likely to be categorized as pronociceptive. These data support the proposition that FC of the DAP reflects or contributes to inhibitory CPM.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"1436-1449"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual differences in conditioned pain modulation are associated with functional connectivity within the descending antinociceptive pathway.\",\"authors\":\"Janet Z Li, Emily P Mills, Natalie R Osborne, Joshua C Cheng, Vaidhehi V Sanmugananthan, Rima El-Sayed, Ariana Besik, Junseok A Kim, Rachael L Bosma, Anton Rogachov, Karen D Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The perception of pain and ability to cope with it varies widely amongst people, which in part could be due to the presence of inhibitory (antinociceptive) or facilitatory (pronociceptive) effects in conditioned pain modulation (CPM). This study examined whether individual differences in CPM reflect functional connectivity (FC) strengths within nodes of the descending antinociceptive pathway (DAP). A heat-based CPM paradigm and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) were used to test the hypothesis that an individual's capacity to exhibit inhibitory CPM (changes in test stimuli [TS] pain due to a conditioning stimulus [CS]) reflects FC of the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC), periaqueductal gray (PAG), and rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). A total of 151 healthy participants (72 men, 79 women) underwent CPM testing and rs-fMRI. Three types of CPM were identified based on the effect of the CS on TS pain: (1) Antinociception: CS reduced TS pain in 45% of participants, (2) No-CPM: CS did not change TS pain in 15% of participants, and (3) Pronociception: CS increased TS pain in 40% of participants. Only the Antinociceptive subgroup exhibited FC between the left sgACC and PAG, right sgACC and PAG, and RVM and PAG. Furthermore, only the Antinociceptive subgroup exhibited a correlation of both left and right sgACC-RVM FC (medium effect sizes) with CPM effect magnitude. Women, compared with men were more likely to be categorized as pronociceptive. These data support the proposition that FC of the DAP reflects or contributes to inhibitory CPM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PAIN®\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1436-1449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067613/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PAIN®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003478\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003478","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:不同的人对疼痛的感知和应对能力差异很大,这在一定程度上可能是由于条件疼痛调节(CPM)中存在抑制(抗痛觉)或促进(前痛觉)效应。本研究考察了CPM的个体差异是否反映了下行抗感知通路(DAP)节点内的功能连接(FC)强度。基于热的CPM模式和静息状态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)用于验证个体表现出抑制CPM的能力(由于条件刺激[CS]引起的测试刺激[TS]疼痛的变化)反映了亚掌前扣带皮层(sgACC)、导水管周围灰质(PAG)和吻侧腹内侧髓质(RVM)的FC。共有151名健康参与者(72名男性,79名女性)接受了CPM测试和rs-fMRI。根据CPM对TS疼痛的影响,确定了三种CPM类型:(1)抗感觉:CS减轻了45%的参与者的TS疼痛,(2)无CPM: CS没有改变15%的参与者的TS疼痛,(3)前感觉:CS增加了40%的参与者的TS疼痛。只有抗感觉亚组在左sgACC和PAG之间、右sgACC和PAG之间、RVM和PAG之间表现出FC。此外,只有抗感知亚组表现出左、右sgACC-RVM FC(中等效应量)与CPM效应大小的相关性。与男性相比,女性更有可能被归类为先入为主。这些数据支持了DAP的FC反映或有助于抑制CPM的命题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individual differences in conditioned pain modulation are associated with functional connectivity within the descending antinociceptive pathway.

Abstract: The perception of pain and ability to cope with it varies widely amongst people, which in part could be due to the presence of inhibitory (antinociceptive) or facilitatory (pronociceptive) effects in conditioned pain modulation (CPM). This study examined whether individual differences in CPM reflect functional connectivity (FC) strengths within nodes of the descending antinociceptive pathway (DAP). A heat-based CPM paradigm and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) were used to test the hypothesis that an individual's capacity to exhibit inhibitory CPM (changes in test stimuli [TS] pain due to a conditioning stimulus [CS]) reflects FC of the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC), periaqueductal gray (PAG), and rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). A total of 151 healthy participants (72 men, 79 women) underwent CPM testing and rs-fMRI. Three types of CPM were identified based on the effect of the CS on TS pain: (1) Antinociception: CS reduced TS pain in 45% of participants, (2) No-CPM: CS did not change TS pain in 15% of participants, and (3) Pronociception: CS increased TS pain in 40% of participants. Only the Antinociceptive subgroup exhibited FC between the left sgACC and PAG, right sgACC and PAG, and RVM and PAG. Furthermore, only the Antinociceptive subgroup exhibited a correlation of both left and right sgACC-RVM FC (medium effect sizes) with CPM effect magnitude. Women, compared with men were more likely to be categorized as pronociceptive. These data support the proposition that FC of the DAP reflects or contributes to inhibitory CPM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信