无色素变性脉络膜病变鉴别的临床及多模态影像学研究。

IF 0.9 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ocular Oncology and Pathology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1159/000540917
Arjun Desai, Niroj Sahoo, Mudit Tyagi, Vishal Raval
{"title":"无色素变性脉络膜病变鉴别的临床及多模态影像学研究。","authors":"Arjun Desai, Niroj Sahoo, Mudit Tyagi, Vishal Raval","doi":"10.1159/000540917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to differentiate amelanotic choroidal lesions - amelanotic choroidal melanoma, choroidal metastasis, and choroidal granuloma using multimodal imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective comparative chart review was done. Patients diagnosed with the abovementioned choroidal lesions from 2015 to 2022 were included. Baseline lesion morphology and retinal layer changes on optical coherence tomography (OCT), lesion echogenicity and dimensions on ocular ultrasonography (USG), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), and indocyanine green angiography (ICG-A) patterns and findings were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve eyes with melanoma, 22 eyes with metastasis, and 9 eyes with granuloma were included. On OCT, 83% of melanomas and 67% of granulomas, and 68% of metastasis had dome-shaped choroidal lesions. Presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) and shaggy photoreceptors was 94% (95% CI: 79-99%) and 90% (95% CI: 74-98%) specific to differentiate melanomas from other choroidal lesions (AUC >0.75, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Similarly, presence of incomplete retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and outer retinal atrophy (iRORA) was 77% (95% CI: 55-92%) sensitive and 77% (95% CI: 53-92%) specific (AUC = 0.8, <i>p</i>+ 0.03) and presence of lumpy-bumpy choroid was 55% (95% CI: 32-76%) sensitive and 95% (95% CI: 76-99%) specific (AUC = 0.75, <i>p</i> = 0.04) to distinguish metastasis from other choroidal lesions. Mean height: base ratio was more in melanoma compared to metastasis (0.54 ± 0.22 vs. 0.43 ± 0.12, <i>p</i> = 0.17) and both were hyperechoic on USG. On FAF, 100% metastasis and 60% granulomas were hypoAF, whereas 100% melanomas were hypoAF. Majority choroidal lesions were hyperfluorescent on FFA. Double vascular circulation was observed in melanomas (50%). On ICG-A, all choroidal lesions were hypofluorescent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical and multimodal imaging features such as the presence of IRF, shaggy photoreceptors, iRORA, and lumpy-bumpy choroid can help diagnose and differentiate amelanotic choroidal lesions, thereby avoiding the need for choroidal biopsy. Further larger studies are needed to devise a standard imaging protocol to validate our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19434,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","volume":"10 4","pages":"206-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11627583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and Multimodal Imaging Study to Differentiate Amelanotic Choroidal Lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Arjun Desai, Niroj Sahoo, Mudit Tyagi, Vishal Raval\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000540917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to differentiate amelanotic choroidal lesions - amelanotic choroidal melanoma, choroidal metastasis, and choroidal granuloma using multimodal imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective comparative chart review was done. Patients diagnosed with the abovementioned choroidal lesions from 2015 to 2022 were included. Baseline lesion morphology and retinal layer changes on optical coherence tomography (OCT), lesion echogenicity and dimensions on ocular ultrasonography (USG), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), and indocyanine green angiography (ICG-A) patterns and findings were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve eyes with melanoma, 22 eyes with metastasis, and 9 eyes with granuloma were included. On OCT, 83% of melanomas and 67% of granulomas, and 68% of metastasis had dome-shaped choroidal lesions. Presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) and shaggy photoreceptors was 94% (95% CI: 79-99%) and 90% (95% CI: 74-98%) specific to differentiate melanomas from other choroidal lesions (AUC >0.75, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Similarly, presence of incomplete retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and outer retinal atrophy (iRORA) was 77% (95% CI: 55-92%) sensitive and 77% (95% CI: 53-92%) specific (AUC = 0.8, <i>p</i>+ 0.03) and presence of lumpy-bumpy choroid was 55% (95% CI: 32-76%) sensitive and 95% (95% CI: 76-99%) specific (AUC = 0.75, <i>p</i> = 0.04) to distinguish metastasis from other choroidal lesions. Mean height: base ratio was more in melanoma compared to metastasis (0.54 ± 0.22 vs. 0.43 ± 0.12, <i>p</i> = 0.17) and both were hyperechoic on USG. On FAF, 100% metastasis and 60% granulomas were hypoAF, whereas 100% melanomas were hypoAF. Majority choroidal lesions were hyperfluorescent on FFA. Double vascular circulation was observed in melanomas (50%). On ICG-A, all choroidal lesions were hypofluorescent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical and multimodal imaging features such as the presence of IRF, shaggy photoreceptors, iRORA, and lumpy-bumpy choroid can help diagnose and differentiate amelanotic choroidal lesions, thereby avoiding the need for choroidal biopsy. Further larger studies are needed to devise a standard imaging protocol to validate our findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocular Oncology and Pathology\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"206-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11627583/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocular Oncology and Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究的目的是通过多模态成像来区分无色素样脉络膜病变-无色素样脉络膜黑色素瘤,脉络膜转移和脉络膜肉芽肿。方法:回顾性比较图表复习。纳入2015 - 2022年诊断为上述脉络膜病变的患者。评估光学相干断层扫描(OCT)的基线病变形态和视网膜层变化,眼超声检查(USG)的病变回声性和尺寸,眼底自身荧光(FAF),眼底荧光素血管造影(FFA)和吲哚菁绿血管造影(ICG-A)模式和结果。结果:黑色素瘤12眼,转移22眼,肉芽肿9眼。在OCT上,83%的黑色素瘤、67%的肉芽肿和68%的转移灶有圆顶状的脉络膜病变。视网膜内液(IRF)和粗糙的光感受器的存在是区分黑色素瘤与其他脉络膜病变的94% (95% CI: 79-99%)和90% (95% CI: 74-98%)特异性(AUC >0.75, p < 0.05)。同样,视网膜色素上皮不完整(RPE)和视网膜外萎缩(iRORA)的存在具有77% (95% CI: 55-92%)的敏感性和77% (95% CI: 53-92%)的特异性(AUC = 0.8, p+ 0.03),而存在肿块状的脉络膜的存在具有55% (95% CI: 32-76%)的敏感性和95% (95% CI: 76-99%)的特异性(AUC = 0.75, p = 0.04),以区分其他脉络膜病变的转移。黑色素瘤的平均身高:基底比高于转移瘤(0.54±0.22比0.43±0.12,p = 0.17),且USG均为高回声。在FAF中,100%的转移和60%的肉芽肿为低房颤,而100%的黑色素瘤为低房颤。大多数脉络膜病变在FFA上呈高荧光。50%的黑色素瘤患者存在双血管循环。在ICG-A上,所有脉络膜病变呈低荧光。结论:临床及多模态影像特征如IRF、粗糙的光感受器、iRORA、块状-凹凸样脉络膜的存在有助于无色素样脉络膜病变的诊断和鉴别,从而避免了脉络膜活检的需要。需要更大规模的研究来设计一个标准的成像方案来验证我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical and Multimodal Imaging Study to Differentiate Amelanotic Choroidal Lesions.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to differentiate amelanotic choroidal lesions - amelanotic choroidal melanoma, choroidal metastasis, and choroidal granuloma using multimodal imaging.

Methods: Retrospective comparative chart review was done. Patients diagnosed with the abovementioned choroidal lesions from 2015 to 2022 were included. Baseline lesion morphology and retinal layer changes on optical coherence tomography (OCT), lesion echogenicity and dimensions on ocular ultrasonography (USG), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), and indocyanine green angiography (ICG-A) patterns and findings were assessed.

Results: Twelve eyes with melanoma, 22 eyes with metastasis, and 9 eyes with granuloma were included. On OCT, 83% of melanomas and 67% of granulomas, and 68% of metastasis had dome-shaped choroidal lesions. Presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) and shaggy photoreceptors was 94% (95% CI: 79-99%) and 90% (95% CI: 74-98%) specific to differentiate melanomas from other choroidal lesions (AUC >0.75, p < 0.05). Similarly, presence of incomplete retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and outer retinal atrophy (iRORA) was 77% (95% CI: 55-92%) sensitive and 77% (95% CI: 53-92%) specific (AUC = 0.8, p+ 0.03) and presence of lumpy-bumpy choroid was 55% (95% CI: 32-76%) sensitive and 95% (95% CI: 76-99%) specific (AUC = 0.75, p = 0.04) to distinguish metastasis from other choroidal lesions. Mean height: base ratio was more in melanoma compared to metastasis (0.54 ± 0.22 vs. 0.43 ± 0.12, p = 0.17) and both were hyperechoic on USG. On FAF, 100% metastasis and 60% granulomas were hypoAF, whereas 100% melanomas were hypoAF. Majority choroidal lesions were hyperfluorescent on FFA. Double vascular circulation was observed in melanomas (50%). On ICG-A, all choroidal lesions were hypofluorescent.

Conclusion: Clinical and multimodal imaging features such as the presence of IRF, shaggy photoreceptors, iRORA, and lumpy-bumpy choroid can help diagnose and differentiate amelanotic choroidal lesions, thereby avoiding the need for choroidal biopsy. Further larger studies are needed to devise a standard imaging protocol to validate our findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信