利用希望和加强如何戒烟的知识:通过每日短信将功效内容纳入烟草风险交流的定性调查。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lillian Brinken, Kate Shiells, Stuart G Ferguson, Stefania Franja, Anna Blackwell, Claire Braboszcz, Olivia M Maynard
{"title":"利用希望和加强如何戒烟的知识:通过每日短信将功效内容纳入烟草风险交流的定性调查。","authors":"Lillian Brinken, Kate Shiells, Stuart G Ferguson, Stefania Franja, Anna Blackwell, Claire Braboszcz, Olivia M Maynard","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tobacco warning labels typically feature confronting health risk messages which aim to evoke fear to change behaviour. Evidence shows these graphic health warning labels (GHWLs) can be effective but can also lead to unintended responses, including avoidance or defensiveness. Theory suggests that targeting beliefs about the likelihood and benefits of successfully quitting may increase adaptive responses to risk information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with nil imminent quitting intentions were recruited to a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in the UK investigating the effects of receiving daily textual SMS messages targeting risk, self-efficacy, and response-efficacy beliefs on cessation behaviour. To explore their experiences receiving SMS messages during the RCT as well as their naturalistic exposure to GHWLs, we undertook a qualitative investigation conducting semi-structured interviews with 20 participants. Four main themes were generated via thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants found efficacy messaging motivating, reporting increased hope for cessation. Further, these messages bolstered knowledge about cessation benefits and treatment options, which may increase treatment-related health literacy. Self-efficacy and response-efficacy messages were well-received and seen to complement each other whereas naturalistic exposure to GHWLs was associated with defensive responses and use of strategies to manage negative affect. GHWLs were seen to contribute to stigmatisation of PWS as part of a broader denormalisation of smoking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GHWLs in their current form can have unintended consequences for people who smoke and can lead to defensive responses. By contrast, messages that address efficacy beliefs can increase hope, knowledge of cessation supports and motivation, thus supporting adaptive responses to smoking health risks.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Continued use of confronting GHWLs in their current form should be reconsidered. Future policy and research should investigate how efficacy content can be effectively integrated into tobacco packaging to optimise the impact of this space in targeting determinants of cessation. Efficacy content can give people who smoke hope for the future and valuable information about pathways to cessation. These benefits may have applications in other streams of health promotion such as primary care, m-health initiatives or public service announcements.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harnessing hope and bolstering knowledge of how to quit: a qualitative investigation of including efficacy content in tobacco risk communication via daily SMS.\",\"authors\":\"Lillian Brinken, Kate Shiells, Stuart G Ferguson, Stefania Franja, Anna Blackwell, Claire Braboszcz, Olivia M Maynard\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntae297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tobacco warning labels typically feature confronting health risk messages which aim to evoke fear to change behaviour. Evidence shows these graphic health warning labels (GHWLs) can be effective but can also lead to unintended responses, including avoidance or defensiveness. Theory suggests that targeting beliefs about the likelihood and benefits of successfully quitting may increase adaptive responses to risk information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with nil imminent quitting intentions were recruited to a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in the UK investigating the effects of receiving daily textual SMS messages targeting risk, self-efficacy, and response-efficacy beliefs on cessation behaviour. To explore their experiences receiving SMS messages during the RCT as well as their naturalistic exposure to GHWLs, we undertook a qualitative investigation conducting semi-structured interviews with 20 participants. Four main themes were generated via thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants found efficacy messaging motivating, reporting increased hope for cessation. Further, these messages bolstered knowledge about cessation benefits and treatment options, which may increase treatment-related health literacy. Self-efficacy and response-efficacy messages were well-received and seen to complement each other whereas naturalistic exposure to GHWLs was associated with defensive responses and use of strategies to manage negative affect. GHWLs were seen to contribute to stigmatisation of PWS as part of a broader denormalisation of smoking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GHWLs in their current form can have unintended consequences for people who smoke and can lead to defensive responses. By contrast, messages that address efficacy beliefs can increase hope, knowledge of cessation supports and motivation, thus supporting adaptive responses to smoking health risks.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Continued use of confronting GHWLs in their current form should be reconsidered. Future policy and research should investigate how efficacy content can be effectively integrated into tobacco packaging to optimise the impact of this space in targeting determinants of cessation. Efficacy content can give people who smoke hope for the future and valuable information about pathways to cessation. These benefits may have applications in other streams of health promotion such as primary care, m-health initiatives or public service announcements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae297\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:烟草警告标签通常具有直面健康风险的信息,旨在唤起恐惧,改变行为。有证据表明,这些图形健康警告标签可能有效,但也可能导致意想不到的反应,包括回避或防御。理论表明,关于成功戒烟的可能性和益处的目标信念可能会增加对风险信息的适应性反应。方法:在英国的一项随机对照试验(RCT)中招募了没有即将戒烟意图的参与者,调查了每天接收针对风险、自我效能和反应效能信念的短信对戒烟行为的影响。为了探索他们在随机试验期间接收短信的经历以及他们对ghwl的自然暴露,我们对20名参与者进行了半结构化访谈的定性调查。通过主题分析产生了四个主要主题。结果:参与者发现疗效信息激励,报告增加了戒烟的希望。此外,这些信息加强了对戒烟益处和治疗方案的了解,这可能会提高与治疗相关的健康素养。自我效能和反应效能信息被很好地接受并相互补充,而自然暴露于ghwl与防御反应和使用策略来管理负面影响有关。ghwl被认为是对PWS的污名化,是吸烟更广泛非常态化的一部分。结论:目前形式的ghwl可能对吸烟者产生意想不到的后果,并可能导致防御反应。相比之下,解决功效信念的信息可以增加希望、戒烟支持和动机方面的知识,从而支持对吸烟健康风险的适应性反应。启示:应重新考虑继续使用目前形式的对抗ghwl。未来的政策和研究应调查如何将功效内容有效地整合到烟草包装中,以优化这一空间在针对戒烟决定因素方面的影响。功效内容可以给吸烟者带来对未来的希望和有关戒烟途径的宝贵信息。这些好处可应用于其他健康促进流,如初级保健、移动保健倡议或公共服务公告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harnessing hope and bolstering knowledge of how to quit: a qualitative investigation of including efficacy content in tobacco risk communication via daily SMS.

Introduction: Tobacco warning labels typically feature confronting health risk messages which aim to evoke fear to change behaviour. Evidence shows these graphic health warning labels (GHWLs) can be effective but can also lead to unintended responses, including avoidance or defensiveness. Theory suggests that targeting beliefs about the likelihood and benefits of successfully quitting may increase adaptive responses to risk information.

Methods: Participants with nil imminent quitting intentions were recruited to a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in the UK investigating the effects of receiving daily textual SMS messages targeting risk, self-efficacy, and response-efficacy beliefs on cessation behaviour. To explore their experiences receiving SMS messages during the RCT as well as their naturalistic exposure to GHWLs, we undertook a qualitative investigation conducting semi-structured interviews with 20 participants. Four main themes were generated via thematic analysis.

Results: Participants found efficacy messaging motivating, reporting increased hope for cessation. Further, these messages bolstered knowledge about cessation benefits and treatment options, which may increase treatment-related health literacy. Self-efficacy and response-efficacy messages were well-received and seen to complement each other whereas naturalistic exposure to GHWLs was associated with defensive responses and use of strategies to manage negative affect. GHWLs were seen to contribute to stigmatisation of PWS as part of a broader denormalisation of smoking.

Conclusions: GHWLs in their current form can have unintended consequences for people who smoke and can lead to defensive responses. By contrast, messages that address efficacy beliefs can increase hope, knowledge of cessation supports and motivation, thus supporting adaptive responses to smoking health risks.

Implications: Continued use of confronting GHWLs in their current form should be reconsidered. Future policy and research should investigate how efficacy content can be effectively integrated into tobacco packaging to optimise the impact of this space in targeting determinants of cessation. Efficacy content can give people who smoke hope for the future and valuable information about pathways to cessation. These benefits may have applications in other streams of health promotion such as primary care, m-health initiatives or public service announcements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信