首次对一种新型细凸探头支气管超声系统进行人体评价。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respiration Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1159/000542966
Nicholas J Pastis, Vidhya Y Aroumougame, Christopher R Gilbert, Adam H Fox, Nichole T Tanner, Travis L Ferguson, Gerard A Silvestri
{"title":"首次对一种新型细凸探头支气管超声系统进行人体评价。","authors":"Nicholas J Pastis, Vidhya Y Aroumougame, Christopher R Gilbert, Adam H Fox, Nichole T Tanner, Travis L Ferguson, Gerard A Silvestri","doi":"10.1159/000542966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The incidence of pulmonary imaging abnormalities continues to increase. While standard convex probe endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscope (CP-EBUS) is safe and accurate, it has limited reach through smaller bronchi. Olympus BF-Y0069 thin convex probe EBUS (TCP-EBUS) has a smaller diameter and improved angulation. We assessed the safety and feasibility of the TCP-EBUS to evaluate lesions not accessible with CP-EBUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, prospective, pilot study evaluating TCP-EBUS enrolled patients undergoing bronchoscopy for lesions within the inner two-thirds of the lung. Patients underwent CP-EBUS to attempt visualization and biopsy. If unsuccessful, TCP-EBUS was used. Safety, lesion characteristics, and pathology results were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one patients were enrolled with multiple lesion locations and no adverse safety events with TCP-EBUS. Seven cases (13.7%) were omitted as the target lesion was visualized by CP-EBUS and TCP-EBUS. CP-EBUS failed to provide biopsy for 44 cases. CP-EBUS visualized 7/44, however, was unable to biopsy. TCP-EBUS visualized 36/44 (81.8%) lesions and biopsied 27/44 (61%) lesions. 8/44 (15.7%) lesions could not be visualized with either device. Median lesion size biopsied with CP-EBUS was 41 mm (IQR: 22-48). Median size of lesions visualized with TCP-EBUS was 20 mm (IQR: 15.3-38), range 8-70. The median distance from the main carina was 62 mm (IQR: 60-89) for lesions biopsied with the CP-EBUS and 63.3 (IQR: 48.5-78.8) for TCP-EBUS. While average distances from main carina were similar in both groups, the furthest lesion TCP-EBUS visualized was 120 mm from the carina compared to 100 mm with CP-EBUS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of TCP-EBUS was safe and effective without observed patient-associated complications, and it provided real-time ultrasonographic visualization and biopsy of lesions not accessible with CP-EBUS.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First in Human Evaluation of a Novel Thin Convex Probe Endobronchial Ultrasound System.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas J Pastis, Vidhya Y Aroumougame, Christopher R Gilbert, Adam H Fox, Nichole T Tanner, Travis L Ferguson, Gerard A Silvestri\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The incidence of pulmonary imaging abnormalities continues to increase. While standard convex probe endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscope (CP-EBUS) is safe and accurate, it has limited reach through smaller bronchi. Olympus BF-Y0069 thin convex probe EBUS (TCP-EBUS) has a smaller diameter and improved angulation. We assessed the safety and feasibility of the TCP-EBUS to evaluate lesions not accessible with CP-EBUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, prospective, pilot study evaluating TCP-EBUS enrolled patients undergoing bronchoscopy for lesions within the inner two-thirds of the lung. Patients underwent CP-EBUS to attempt visualization and biopsy. If unsuccessful, TCP-EBUS was used. Safety, lesion characteristics, and pathology results were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one patients were enrolled with multiple lesion locations and no adverse safety events with TCP-EBUS. Seven cases (13.7%) were omitted as the target lesion was visualized by CP-EBUS and TCP-EBUS. CP-EBUS failed to provide biopsy for 44 cases. CP-EBUS visualized 7/44, however, was unable to biopsy. TCP-EBUS visualized 36/44 (81.8%) lesions and biopsied 27/44 (61%) lesions. 8/44 (15.7%) lesions could not be visualized with either device. Median lesion size biopsied with CP-EBUS was 41 mm (IQR: 22-48). Median size of lesions visualized with TCP-EBUS was 20 mm (IQR: 15.3-38), range 8-70. The median distance from the main carina was 62 mm (IQR: 60-89) for lesions biopsied with the CP-EBUS and 63.3 (IQR: 48.5-78.8) for TCP-EBUS. While average distances from main carina were similar in both groups, the furthest lesion TCP-EBUS visualized was 120 mm from the carina compared to 100 mm with CP-EBUS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of TCP-EBUS was safe and effective without observed patient-associated complications, and it provided real-time ultrasonographic visualization and biopsy of lesions not accessible with CP-EBUS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiration\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542966\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:肺部影像学异常的发生率持续增加。虽然标准的CP-EBUS是安全和准确的,但它通过较小的支气管的范围有限。奥林巴斯BF-Y0069 TCP-EBUS具有更小的直径和改进的角度。我们评估了TCP-EBUS用于评估CP-EBUS无法触及的病变的安全性和可行性。方法:一项评估TCP-EBUS的单中心、前瞻性、试点研究纳入了接受支气管镜检查肺部内三分之二病变的患者。患者行CP-EBUS观察和活检。如果失败,则使用TCP-EBUS。收集安全性、病变特征和病理结果。结果:51例患者入组,病变部位多,TCP-EBUS无不良安全事件。7例(13.7%)因使用CP-EBUS和TCP-EBUS显示靶病变而被忽略。44例CP-EBUS未能提供活检。然而,7/44 CP-EBUS显示无法活检。TCP-EBUS显示36/44(81.8%)病变,活检27/44(61%)病变。8/44(15.7%)的病变在两种仪器中均不能显像。CP-EBUS活检的中位病灶大小为41mm(IQR 22-48)。TCP-EBUS显示病灶的中位大小为20mm(IQR为15.3-38),范围为8-70。CP-EBUS活检病灶与主隆突的中位距离为62mm(IQR 60-89), TCP-EBUS活检病灶与主隆突的中位距离为63.3(IQR 48.5-78.8)。虽然两组与主隆突的平均距离相似,但CP-EBUS显示的最远病变距离隆突120mm,而CP-EBUS显示的最远病变距离隆突100mm。结论:TCP- EBUS的使用安全有效,无观察到的患者相关并发症,并提供了CP-EBUS无法获得的病变的实时超声显示和活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First in Human Evaluation of a Novel Thin Convex Probe Endobronchial Ultrasound System.

Introduction: The incidence of pulmonary imaging abnormalities continues to increase. While standard convex probe endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscope (CP-EBUS) is safe and accurate, it has limited reach through smaller bronchi. Olympus BF-Y0069 thin convex probe EBUS (TCP-EBUS) has a smaller diameter and improved angulation. We assessed the safety and feasibility of the TCP-EBUS to evaluate lesions not accessible with CP-EBUS.

Methods: A single-center, prospective, pilot study evaluating TCP-EBUS enrolled patients undergoing bronchoscopy for lesions within the inner two-thirds of the lung. Patients underwent CP-EBUS to attempt visualization and biopsy. If unsuccessful, TCP-EBUS was used. Safety, lesion characteristics, and pathology results were collected.

Results: Fifty-one patients were enrolled with multiple lesion locations and no adverse safety events with TCP-EBUS. Seven cases (13.7%) were omitted as the target lesion was visualized by CP-EBUS and TCP-EBUS. CP-EBUS failed to provide biopsy for 44 cases. CP-EBUS visualized 7/44, however, was unable to biopsy. TCP-EBUS visualized 36/44 (81.8%) lesions and biopsied 27/44 (61%) lesions. 8/44 (15.7%) lesions could not be visualized with either device. Median lesion size biopsied with CP-EBUS was 41 mm (IQR: 22-48). Median size of lesions visualized with TCP-EBUS was 20 mm (IQR: 15.3-38), range 8-70. The median distance from the main carina was 62 mm (IQR: 60-89) for lesions biopsied with the CP-EBUS and 63.3 (IQR: 48.5-78.8) for TCP-EBUS. While average distances from main carina were similar in both groups, the furthest lesion TCP-EBUS visualized was 120 mm from the carina compared to 100 mm with CP-EBUS.

Conclusions: The use of TCP-EBUS was safe and effective without observed patient-associated complications, and it provided real-time ultrasonographic visualization and biopsy of lesions not accessible with CP-EBUS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiration
Respiration 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信