加拿大射频肾去神经治疗未控制高血压的成本-效果分析。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2024.2441072
Philip A McFarlane, Mina Madan, Anne M Ryschon, Sheldon Tobe, Ernesto L Schiffrin, Raj S Padwal, Ross Feldman, George Dresser, Lindsay Machan, Hamid Sadri, Khoa N Cao, Jan B Pietzsch
{"title":"加拿大射频肾去神经治疗未控制高血压的成本-效果分析。","authors":"Philip A McFarlane, Mina Madan, Anne M Ryschon, Sheldon Tobe, Ernesto L Schiffrin, Raj S Padwal, Ross Feldman, George Dresser, Lindsay Machan, Hamid Sadri, Khoa N Cao, Jan B Pietzsch","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2441072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) is an interventional treatment for uncontrolled hypertension. This analysis explored the therapy's lifetime cost-effectiveness in a Canadian healthcare setting.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A decision-analytic Markov model was used to project health events, costs, and quality-adjusted life years over a lifetime horizon. Seven primary health states were modeled, including hypertension alone, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), other symptomatic coronary artery disease, heart failure (HF), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and death. Multivariate risk equations and a meta-regression of hypertension trials informed transition probabilities. Contemporary clinical evidence from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial informed the base case treatment effect (-4.9 mmHg change in office systolic blood pressure (oSBP) observed vs. sham control). Costs were sourced from published literature. A 1.5% discount rate was applied to costs and effects, and the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained. Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 10 years, RF RDN resulted in relative risk reduction in clinical events (0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for MI, and 0.72 for HF). Under the base case assumptions, RF RDN was found to add 0.51 (15.81 vs. 15.30) QALYs at an incremental cost of $6,031 ($73,971 vs. $67,040) over a lifetime, resulting in an ICER of $11,809 per QALY gained. Cost-effectiveness findings were found robust in sensitivity analyses, with the 95% confidence interval for the ICER based on 10,000 simulations ranging from $4,489 to $22,587 per QALY gained.</p><p><strong>Limitations and conclusion: </strong>Model projections suggest RF RDN, under assumed maintained treatment effect, is a cost-effective treatment strategy for uncontrolled hypertension in the Canadian healthcare system based on meaningful reductions in clinical events.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"70-80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness analysis of radiofrequency renal denervation for uncontrolled hypertension in Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Philip A McFarlane, Mina Madan, Anne M Ryschon, Sheldon Tobe, Ernesto L Schiffrin, Raj S Padwal, Ross Feldman, George Dresser, Lindsay Machan, Hamid Sadri, Khoa N Cao, Jan B Pietzsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696998.2024.2441072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) is an interventional treatment for uncontrolled hypertension. This analysis explored the therapy's lifetime cost-effectiveness in a Canadian healthcare setting.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A decision-analytic Markov model was used to project health events, costs, and quality-adjusted life years over a lifetime horizon. Seven primary health states were modeled, including hypertension alone, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), other symptomatic coronary artery disease, heart failure (HF), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and death. Multivariate risk equations and a meta-regression of hypertension trials informed transition probabilities. Contemporary clinical evidence from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial informed the base case treatment effect (-4.9 mmHg change in office systolic blood pressure (oSBP) observed vs. sham control). Costs were sourced from published literature. A 1.5% discount rate was applied to costs and effects, and the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained. Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 10 years, RF RDN resulted in relative risk reduction in clinical events (0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for MI, and 0.72 for HF). Under the base case assumptions, RF RDN was found to add 0.51 (15.81 vs. 15.30) QALYs at an incremental cost of $6,031 ($73,971 vs. $67,040) over a lifetime, resulting in an ICER of $11,809 per QALY gained. Cost-effectiveness findings were found robust in sensitivity analyses, with the 95% confidence interval for the ICER based on 10,000 simulations ranging from $4,489 to $22,587 per QALY gained.</p><p><strong>Limitations and conclusion: </strong>Model projections suggest RF RDN, under assumed maintained treatment effect, is a cost-effective treatment strategy for uncontrolled hypertension in the Canadian healthcare system based on meaningful reductions in clinical events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"70-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2441072\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2441072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:基于导管的射频肾去神经支配(RF RDN)是一种介入治疗不受控制的高血压的方法。本分析探讨了该疗法在加拿大医疗环境中的终身成本效益。材料和方法:使用决策分析马尔可夫模型来预测一生中的健康事件、成本和质量调整寿命年。7种主要健康状态建模,包括单独高血压、中风、心肌梗死(MI)、其他症状性冠状动脉疾病、心力衰竭(HF)、终末期肾病(ESRD)和死亡。高血压试验的多变量风险方程和元回归提示了转移概率。来自SPYRAL HTN-ON MED试验的当代临床证据证实了基本病例治疗效果(与假对照组相比,观察到办公室收缩压(oSBP)变化-4.9 mmHg)。费用来源于已发表的文献。对成本和效果采用1.5%的贴现率,并根据每个获得QALY的意愿支付50,000美元的门槛来评估由此产生的增量成本效益比(ICER)。进行了广泛的情景分析和敏感性分析。结果:在10年内,RF RDN导致临床事件的相对风险降低(卒中0.80,心肌梗死0.88,心衰0.72)。在基本情况假设下,发现RF RDN在一生中增加0.51(15.81对15.30)个QALY,增量成本为6,031美元(73,971美元对67,040美元),导致每获得一个QALY的ICER为11,809美元。在敏感性分析中,成本效益发现是稳健的,基于10,000次模拟的ICER的95%置信区间为每个QALY获得4,489至22,587美元。局限性和结论:模型预测表明,在假定维持治疗效果的情况下,RF RDN是加拿大医疗保健系统中一种具有成本效益的治疗策略,可有效减少临床事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-effectiveness analysis of radiofrequency renal denervation for uncontrolled hypertension in Canada.

Aims: Catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) is an interventional treatment for uncontrolled hypertension. This analysis explored the therapy's lifetime cost-effectiveness in a Canadian healthcare setting.

Materials and methods: A decision-analytic Markov model was used to project health events, costs, and quality-adjusted life years over a lifetime horizon. Seven primary health states were modeled, including hypertension alone, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), other symptomatic coronary artery disease, heart failure (HF), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and death. Multivariate risk equations and a meta-regression of hypertension trials informed transition probabilities. Contemporary clinical evidence from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial informed the base case treatment effect (-4.9 mmHg change in office systolic blood pressure (oSBP) observed vs. sham control). Costs were sourced from published literature. A 1.5% discount rate was applied to costs and effects, and the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained. Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: Over 10 years, RF RDN resulted in relative risk reduction in clinical events (0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for MI, and 0.72 for HF). Under the base case assumptions, RF RDN was found to add 0.51 (15.81 vs. 15.30) QALYs at an incremental cost of $6,031 ($73,971 vs. $67,040) over a lifetime, resulting in an ICER of $11,809 per QALY gained. Cost-effectiveness findings were found robust in sensitivity analyses, with the 95% confidence interval for the ICER based on 10,000 simulations ranging from $4,489 to $22,587 per QALY gained.

Limitations and conclusion: Model projections suggest RF RDN, under assumed maintained treatment effect, is a cost-effective treatment strategy for uncontrolled hypertension in the Canadian healthcare system based on meaningful reductions in clinical events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信