猫听觉中脑神经元对不同信噪比语音刺激的整体反应。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Anu Sabu , Dexter Irvine , David B. Grayden , James Fallon
{"title":"猫听觉中脑神经元对不同信噪比语音刺激的整体反应。","authors":"Anu Sabu ,&nbsp;Dexter Irvine ,&nbsp;David B. Grayden ,&nbsp;James Fallon","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2024.109163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Originally reserved for those who are profoundly deaf, cochlear implantation is now common for people with partial hearing loss, particularly when combined with a hearing aid. This combined intervention enhances speech comprehension and sound quality when compared to electrical stimulation alone, particularly in noisy environments, but the physiological basis for the benefits is not well understood. Our long-term aim is to elucidate the underlying physiological mechanisms of this improvement, and as a first step in this process, we have investigated in normal hearing cats, the degree to which the patterns of neural activity evoked in the inferior colliculus (IC) by speech sounds in various levels of noise allows discrimination between those sounds. Neuronal responses were recorded simultaneously from 32 sites across the tonotopic axis of the IC in anaesthetised normal hearing cats (<em>n</em> = 7). Speech sounds were presented at 20, 40 and 60 dB SPL in quiet and with increasing levels of additive noise (signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) –20, –15, –10, –5, 0, +5, +10, +15, +20 dB). Neural discrimination was assessed using a Euclidean measure of distance between neural responses, resulting in a function reflecting speech sound differentiation across various SNRs. Responses of IC neurons reliably encoded the speech stimuli when presented in quiet, with optimal performance when an analysis bin-width of 5–10 ms was used. Discrimination thresholds did not depend on stimulus level and were best for shorter analysis binwidths. This study sheds light on how the auditory midbrain represents speech sounds and provides baseline data with which responses to electro-acoustic speech sounds in partially deafened animals can be compared.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"456 ","pages":"Article 109163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ensemble responses of auditory midbrain neurons in the cat to speech stimuli at different signal-to-noise ratios\",\"authors\":\"Anu Sabu ,&nbsp;Dexter Irvine ,&nbsp;David B. Grayden ,&nbsp;James Fallon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heares.2024.109163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Originally reserved for those who are profoundly deaf, cochlear implantation is now common for people with partial hearing loss, particularly when combined with a hearing aid. This combined intervention enhances speech comprehension and sound quality when compared to electrical stimulation alone, particularly in noisy environments, but the physiological basis for the benefits is not well understood. Our long-term aim is to elucidate the underlying physiological mechanisms of this improvement, and as a first step in this process, we have investigated in normal hearing cats, the degree to which the patterns of neural activity evoked in the inferior colliculus (IC) by speech sounds in various levels of noise allows discrimination between those sounds. Neuronal responses were recorded simultaneously from 32 sites across the tonotopic axis of the IC in anaesthetised normal hearing cats (<em>n</em> = 7). Speech sounds were presented at 20, 40 and 60 dB SPL in quiet and with increasing levels of additive noise (signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) –20, –15, –10, –5, 0, +5, +10, +15, +20 dB). Neural discrimination was assessed using a Euclidean measure of distance between neural responses, resulting in a function reflecting speech sound differentiation across various SNRs. Responses of IC neurons reliably encoded the speech stimuli when presented in quiet, with optimal performance when an analysis bin-width of 5–10 ms was used. Discrimination thresholds did not depend on stimulus level and were best for shorter analysis binwidths. This study sheds light on how the auditory midbrain represents speech sounds and provides baseline data with which responses to electro-acoustic speech sounds in partially deafened animals can be compared.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\"456 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524002168\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524002168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工耳蜗植入术最初是为那些重度失聪的人准备的,现在对于部分听力损失的人来说很常见,特别是当与助听器结合使用时。与单独的电刺激相比,这种联合干预可以提高语音理解能力和音质,特别是在嘈杂的环境中,但其生理基础尚未得到很好的理解。我们的长期目标是阐明这种改善的潜在生理机制,作为这一过程的第一步,我们在正常听力的猫中研究了不同噪音水平的语音在下丘(IC)中引起的神经活动模式在多大程度上允许区分这些声音。在麻醉的正常听力猫(n = 7)的IC上,同时记录32个部位的神经元反应。在安静的情况下,语音以20、40和60 dB声压级呈现,并随着附加噪声(信噪比(SNRs) -20、-15、-10、-5、0、+5、+10、+15、+20 dB)水平的增加而增加。神经辨别使用欧几里得测量神经反应之间的距离来评估,从而产生反映不同信噪比的语音分化的功能。在安静环境下,IC神经元的响应可靠地编码语音刺激,当分析盒宽度为5-10 ms时表现最佳。区分阈值不依赖于刺激水平,并且最适合于较短的分析双宽。这项研究揭示了听觉中脑如何代表语音,并提供了基线数据,可以比较部分失聪动物对电声语音的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ensemble responses of auditory midbrain neurons in the cat to speech stimuli at different signal-to-noise ratios
Originally reserved for those who are profoundly deaf, cochlear implantation is now common for people with partial hearing loss, particularly when combined with a hearing aid. This combined intervention enhances speech comprehension and sound quality when compared to electrical stimulation alone, particularly in noisy environments, but the physiological basis for the benefits is not well understood. Our long-term aim is to elucidate the underlying physiological mechanisms of this improvement, and as a first step in this process, we have investigated in normal hearing cats, the degree to which the patterns of neural activity evoked in the inferior colliculus (IC) by speech sounds in various levels of noise allows discrimination between those sounds. Neuronal responses were recorded simultaneously from 32 sites across the tonotopic axis of the IC in anaesthetised normal hearing cats (n = 7). Speech sounds were presented at 20, 40 and 60 dB SPL in quiet and with increasing levels of additive noise (signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) –20, –15, –10, –5, 0, +5, +10, +15, +20 dB). Neural discrimination was assessed using a Euclidean measure of distance between neural responses, resulting in a function reflecting speech sound differentiation across various SNRs. Responses of IC neurons reliably encoded the speech stimuli when presented in quiet, with optimal performance when an analysis bin-width of 5–10 ms was used. Discrimination thresholds did not depend on stimulus level and were best for shorter analysis binwidths. This study sheds light on how the auditory midbrain represents speech sounds and provides baseline data with which responses to electro-acoustic speech sounds in partially deafened animals can be compared.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Research
Hearing Research 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
163
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles. Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信