更多的食物,但更少的土地和水的自然:为什么农业生产力的提高没有实现

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Chris Seijger , Anton Urfels , Maria Christoforidou , Petra Hellegers , Gerlo Borghuis , Simon Langan , Gerardo van Halsema
{"title":"更多的食物,但更少的土地和水的自然:为什么农业生产力的提高没有实现","authors":"Chris Seijger ,&nbsp;Anton Urfels ,&nbsp;Maria Christoforidou ,&nbsp;Petra Hellegers ,&nbsp;Gerlo Borghuis ,&nbsp;Simon Langan ,&nbsp;Gerardo van Halsema","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Realism about productivity gains in agriculture and water is critical to understand if the world can feed itself while protecting nature. We use government-reported data to review progress over 2000–2020 compared to projections for irrigated and rainfed agriculture and trade. Our results over the period 2000–2020 show that productivity gains largely did not materialize. Instead of consolidating cereal production and trade in favourable regions like North America, Europe and Russia, their arable land declined by 35 million hectares, while arable land expanded by 74 million hectares in Africa, Latin America and Eastern Asia. Likewise, water productivity gains did not materialize, as photosynthesis breakthroughs did not occur. Land productivity (yield) gains were projected to rise 21–61 %, making the observed increase in cereal yields of 31 % a slight one. This puts the world on the path of using steadily more land and water to produce food and feed, at the expense of nature. Solutions to veer off this path include reducing food demand (including dietary change), stabilising rainfed agriculture and broadening the crop genetic resources base.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"307 ","pages":"Article 109229"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More food, but less land and water for nature: Why agricultural productivity gains did not materialize\",\"authors\":\"Chris Seijger ,&nbsp;Anton Urfels ,&nbsp;Maria Christoforidou ,&nbsp;Petra Hellegers ,&nbsp;Gerlo Borghuis ,&nbsp;Simon Langan ,&nbsp;Gerardo van Halsema\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Realism about productivity gains in agriculture and water is critical to understand if the world can feed itself while protecting nature. We use government-reported data to review progress over 2000–2020 compared to projections for irrigated and rainfed agriculture and trade. Our results over the period 2000–2020 show that productivity gains largely did not materialize. Instead of consolidating cereal production and trade in favourable regions like North America, Europe and Russia, their arable land declined by 35 million hectares, while arable land expanded by 74 million hectares in Africa, Latin America and Eastern Asia. Likewise, water productivity gains did not materialize, as photosynthesis breakthroughs did not occur. Land productivity (yield) gains were projected to rise 21–61 %, making the observed increase in cereal yields of 31 % a slight one. This puts the world on the path of using steadily more land and water to produce food and feed, at the expense of nature. Solutions to veer off this path include reducing food demand (including dietary change), stabilising rainfed agriculture and broadening the crop genetic resources base.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"volume\":\"307 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424005651\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424005651","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要了解世界能否在保护自然的同时养活自己,在农业和水资源方面提高生产力的现实主义是至关重要的。我们使用政府报告的数据来审查2000-2020年期间的进展,并将其与灌溉和雨养农业和贸易的预测进行比较。我们在2000年至2020年期间的结果表明,生产率的提高在很大程度上没有实现。北美、欧洲和俄罗斯等有利地区的谷物生产和贸易没有得到巩固,他们的耕地面积减少了3500万公顷,而非洲、拉丁美洲和东亚的耕地面积增加了7400万公顷。同样,由于光合作用的突破没有发生,水生产力的提高也没有实现。预计土地生产力(产量)将增加21-61 %,使观测到的谷物产量增加31 %显得微不足道。这将使世界走上一条以牺牲自然为代价,不断使用更多土地和水来生产粮食和饲料的道路。改变这条道路的解决方案包括减少粮食需求(包括改变饮食习惯)、稳定雨养农业和扩大作物遗传资源基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
More food, but less land and water for nature: Why agricultural productivity gains did not materialize
Realism about productivity gains in agriculture and water is critical to understand if the world can feed itself while protecting nature. We use government-reported data to review progress over 2000–2020 compared to projections for irrigated and rainfed agriculture and trade. Our results over the period 2000–2020 show that productivity gains largely did not materialize. Instead of consolidating cereal production and trade in favourable regions like North America, Europe and Russia, their arable land declined by 35 million hectares, while arable land expanded by 74 million hectares in Africa, Latin America and Eastern Asia. Likewise, water productivity gains did not materialize, as photosynthesis breakthroughs did not occur. Land productivity (yield) gains were projected to rise 21–61 %, making the observed increase in cereal yields of 31 % a slight one. This puts the world on the path of using steadily more land and water to produce food and feed, at the expense of nature. Solutions to veer off this path include reducing food demand (including dietary change), stabilising rainfed agriculture and broadening the crop genetic resources base.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信