小胶质细胞是大脑突触的猎人或采集者

IF 21.2 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Marta Pereira-Iglesias, Joel Maldonado-Teixido, Alejandro Melero, Joaquin Piriz, Elena Galea, Richard M. Ransohoff, Amanda Sierra
{"title":"小胶质细胞是大脑突触的猎人或采集者","authors":"Marta Pereira-Iglesias, Joel Maldonado-Teixido, Alejandro Melero, Joaquin Piriz, Elena Galea, Richard M. Ransohoff, Amanda Sierra","doi":"10.1038/s41593-024-01818-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over a decade ago, it was discovered that microglia, the brain’s immune cells, engulf synaptic material in a process named microglial pruning. This term suggests that microglia actively sculpt brain circuits by tagging and phagocytosing unwanted synapses. However, live imaging studies have yet to demonstrate how microglial synapse elimination occurs. To address this issue, we propose a new conceptual framework distinguishing between two potential mechanisms of synapse elimination, culling and scavenging. During culling, microglia may use a contractile ring to sever the neuronal plasma membrane, removing the unwanted synapse. During scavenging, synapse elimination is neuronal-driven, and the neuronal plasma membrane fission machinery sheds off synapses that are later phagocytosed by microglia. We will discuss the current limitations of studying microglial synapse elimination and evaluate evidence supporting either culling or scavenging. Discerning between these mechanisms is essential for determining the therapeutic value of phagocytosis modulators in diseases with altered brain connectivity. How microglia sculpt brain circuits is not clear. Here, the authors propose that their contribution to synapse removal may occur by severing synapses (culling) or collecting synapses shed off by neurons (scavenging).","PeriodicalId":19076,"journal":{"name":"Nature neuroscience","volume":"28 1","pages":"15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":21.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microglia as hunters or gatherers of brain synapses\",\"authors\":\"Marta Pereira-Iglesias, Joel Maldonado-Teixido, Alejandro Melero, Joaquin Piriz, Elena Galea, Richard M. Ransohoff, Amanda Sierra\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41593-024-01818-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over a decade ago, it was discovered that microglia, the brain’s immune cells, engulf synaptic material in a process named microglial pruning. This term suggests that microglia actively sculpt brain circuits by tagging and phagocytosing unwanted synapses. However, live imaging studies have yet to demonstrate how microglial synapse elimination occurs. To address this issue, we propose a new conceptual framework distinguishing between two potential mechanisms of synapse elimination, culling and scavenging. During culling, microglia may use a contractile ring to sever the neuronal plasma membrane, removing the unwanted synapse. During scavenging, synapse elimination is neuronal-driven, and the neuronal plasma membrane fission machinery sheds off synapses that are later phagocytosed by microglia. We will discuss the current limitations of studying microglial synapse elimination and evaluate evidence supporting either culling or scavenging. Discerning between these mechanisms is essential for determining the therapeutic value of phagocytosis modulators in diseases with altered brain connectivity. How microglia sculpt brain circuits is not clear. Here, the authors propose that their contribution to synapse removal may occur by severing synapses (culling) or collecting synapses shed off by neurons (scavenging).\",\"PeriodicalId\":19076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"15-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-024-01818-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-024-01818-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

十多年前,人们发现小胶质细胞,大脑的免疫细胞,在一个被称为小胶质细胞修剪的过程中吞噬突触物质。这个术语表明,小胶质细胞通过标记和吞噬不需要的突触来积极地塑造大脑回路。然而,实时成像研究尚未证明小胶质突触消除是如何发生的。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一个新的概念框架,区分突触消除的两种潜在机制,剔除和清除。在筛选过程中,小胶质细胞可以使用一个收缩环切断神经元质膜,去除不需要的突触。在清除过程中,突触消除是由神经元驱动的,神经元质膜裂变机制脱落突触,这些突触随后被小胶质细胞吞噬。我们将讨论目前研究小胶质突触消除的局限性,并评估支持淘汰或清除的证据。辨别这些机制对于确定吞噬调节剂在脑连通性改变疾病中的治疗价值至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Microglia as hunters or gatherers of brain synapses

Microglia as hunters or gatherers of brain synapses

Microglia as hunters or gatherers of brain synapses
Over a decade ago, it was discovered that microglia, the brain’s immune cells, engulf synaptic material in a process named microglial pruning. This term suggests that microglia actively sculpt brain circuits by tagging and phagocytosing unwanted synapses. However, live imaging studies have yet to demonstrate how microglial synapse elimination occurs. To address this issue, we propose a new conceptual framework distinguishing between two potential mechanisms of synapse elimination, culling and scavenging. During culling, microglia may use a contractile ring to sever the neuronal plasma membrane, removing the unwanted synapse. During scavenging, synapse elimination is neuronal-driven, and the neuronal plasma membrane fission machinery sheds off synapses that are later phagocytosed by microglia. We will discuss the current limitations of studying microglial synapse elimination and evaluate evidence supporting either culling or scavenging. Discerning between these mechanisms is essential for determining the therapeutic value of phagocytosis modulators in diseases with altered brain connectivity. How microglia sculpt brain circuits is not clear. Here, the authors propose that their contribution to synapse removal may occur by severing synapses (culling) or collecting synapses shed off by neurons (scavenging).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature neuroscience
Nature neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
38.60
自引率
1.20%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Neuroscience, a multidisciplinary journal, publishes papers of the utmost quality and significance across all realms of neuroscience. The editors welcome contributions spanning molecular, cellular, systems, and cognitive neuroscience, along with psychophysics, computational modeling, and nervous system disorders. While no area is off-limits, studies offering fundamental insights into nervous system function receive priority. The journal offers high visibility to both readers and authors, fostering interdisciplinary communication and accessibility to a broad audience. It maintains high standards of copy editing and production, rigorous peer review, rapid publication, and operates independently from academic societies and other vested interests. In addition to primary research, Nature Neuroscience features news and views, reviews, editorials, commentaries, perspectives, book reviews, and correspondence, aiming to serve as the voice of the global neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信