持续躯体症状和功能障碍患者的初级和二级护理合作的障碍和潜在解决方案:一项名义组技术研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
European Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1080/13814788.2024.2413090
Nick Mamo, Judith G M Rosmalen, Denise J C Hanssen, Lineke M Tak, Tim C Olde Hartman
{"title":"持续躯体症状和功能障碍患者的初级和二级护理合作的障碍和潜在解决方案:一项名义组技术研究。","authors":"Nick Mamo, Judith G M Rosmalen, Denise J C Hanssen, Lineke M Tak, Tim C Olde Hartman","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2024.2413090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders (PSS/FD) are complex conditions requiring collaboration between healthcare professionals. This is especially true at the interface between primary and secondary care interface. The current fragmentation of care is a major barrier to this, leading to poor experiences and outcomes and high costs for healthcare and society.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim is to identify barriers and possible solutions for collaboration between primary and secondary care in patients with PSS/FD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In two sessions, using the nominal group technique, a mix of primary and secondary care professionals identified barriers and possible solutions to collaboration between primary and secondary care in PSS/FD care. Barriers to collaboration were identified during session one, with potential solutions identified during session two in response to the top eight barriers. Each session ended with a voting round ranking the barriers and solutions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 healthcare professionals participated in two sessions. In the first session, 55 participants provided a list of 22 barriers, while in the second session, 47 participants provided 18 possible solutions. The top barriers related to shared language and protocols, referral quality, expectations and responsibilities between healthcare professionals and patients, and time pressure. The top solutions identified related to general practitioners using electronic consultations with specialists and shared terminology with patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The identified barriers and possible solutions for collaboration between primary and secondary care need attention when considering collaboration in PSS/FD care and related settings, both in new and ongoing collaborations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"30 1","pages":"2413090"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11485729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and potential solutions for collaboration between primary and secondary care in patients with persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders: A nominal group technique study.\",\"authors\":\"Nick Mamo, Judith G M Rosmalen, Denise J C Hanssen, Lineke M Tak, Tim C Olde Hartman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13814788.2024.2413090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders (PSS/FD) are complex conditions requiring collaboration between healthcare professionals. This is especially true at the interface between primary and secondary care interface. The current fragmentation of care is a major barrier to this, leading to poor experiences and outcomes and high costs for healthcare and society.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim is to identify barriers and possible solutions for collaboration between primary and secondary care in patients with PSS/FD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In two sessions, using the nominal group technique, a mix of primary and secondary care professionals identified barriers and possible solutions to collaboration between primary and secondary care in PSS/FD care. Barriers to collaboration were identified during session one, with potential solutions identified during session two in response to the top eight barriers. Each session ended with a voting round ranking the barriers and solutions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 healthcare professionals participated in two sessions. In the first session, 55 participants provided a list of 22 barriers, while in the second session, 47 participants provided 18 possible solutions. The top barriers related to shared language and protocols, referral quality, expectations and responsibilities between healthcare professionals and patients, and time pressure. The top solutions identified related to general practitioners using electronic consultations with specialists and shared terminology with patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The identified barriers and possible solutions for collaboration between primary and secondary care need attention when considering collaboration in PSS/FD care and related settings, both in new and ongoing collaborations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"2413090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11485729/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2024.2413090\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2024.2413090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:持续性躯体症状和功能障碍(PSS/FD)是一种复杂的疾病,需要医疗保健专业人员之间的合作。在初级保健和二级保健之间的界面上尤其如此。目前护理的碎片化是实现这一目标的主要障碍,导致糟糕的经验和结果以及医疗保健和社会的高成本。目的:旨在确定PSS/FD患者初级和二级护理之间合作的障碍和可能的解决方案。方法:在两次会议中,使用名义小组技术,初级和二级保健专业人员确定了PSS/FD护理中初级和二级保健之间合作的障碍和可能的解决方案。在第一次会议上确定了合作的障碍,在第二次会议上针对前8个障碍确定了潜在的解决方案。每次会议结束时,都会进行一轮投票,对障碍和解决方案进行排名。结果:共有102名医护人员参加了两次会议。在第一届会议上,55名与会者列出了22个障碍,而在第二届会议上,47名与会者提供了18个可能的解决方案。最大的障碍与共享语言和协议、转诊质量、医疗保健专业人员和患者之间的期望和责任以及时间压力有关。确定的最佳解决方案与全科医生使用专家电子咨询和与患者共享术语有关。结论:在考虑PSS/FD护理和相关设置的合作时,无论是在新的还是正在进行的合作中,都需要注意初级和二级护理之间合作的已确定障碍和可能的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and potential solutions for collaboration between primary and secondary care in patients with persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders: A nominal group technique study.

Background: Persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders (PSS/FD) are complex conditions requiring collaboration between healthcare professionals. This is especially true at the interface between primary and secondary care interface. The current fragmentation of care is a major barrier to this, leading to poor experiences and outcomes and high costs for healthcare and society.

Objectives: The aim is to identify barriers and possible solutions for collaboration between primary and secondary care in patients with PSS/FD.

Methods: In two sessions, using the nominal group technique, a mix of primary and secondary care professionals identified barriers and possible solutions to collaboration between primary and secondary care in PSS/FD care. Barriers to collaboration were identified during session one, with potential solutions identified during session two in response to the top eight barriers. Each session ended with a voting round ranking the barriers and solutions.

Results: A total of 102 healthcare professionals participated in two sessions. In the first session, 55 participants provided a list of 22 barriers, while in the second session, 47 participants provided 18 possible solutions. The top barriers related to shared language and protocols, referral quality, expectations and responsibilities between healthcare professionals and patients, and time pressure. The top solutions identified related to general practitioners using electronic consultations with specialists and shared terminology with patients.

Conclusion: The identified barriers and possible solutions for collaboration between primary and secondary care need attention when considering collaboration in PSS/FD care and related settings, both in new and ongoing collaborations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of General Practice
European Journal of General Practice PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The EJGP aims to: foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe. Scope The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology. Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信