{"title":"ChatGPT 3.5和4.0作为尺度椎体三角区解剖教学工具的可靠性和有效性。","authors":"Anjali Singal, Swati Goyal","doi":"10.1007/s00276-024-03513-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As the popularity and the usage of the artificial intelligence (AI) tools is increasing in medical education, it is important to critically evaluate these resources and confirm their reliability. The current study proposes to assess the reliability and effectiveness of ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 for gross anatomical information on scalenovertebral triangle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4 AI tools were used to explore the anatomical information on scalenovertebral triangle eight times on different days. The responses were qualitatively compared to the actual anatomy of the region and comments were made by the authors for each response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The replies given by ChatGPT were not appropriate (either incorrect, partially correct or incomplete) in any of the conversations. There was no major difference between the accuracy of responses, while comparing ChatGPT 3.5 and 4. Almost three out of four times, ChatGPT confused scalenovertebral triangle with scalene or interscalene triangle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>None of the responses provided by ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 across all eight instances aligned even once with the standard anatomical description of the scalenovertebral triangle. A novice medical student may not be able to judge the difference between correct and incorrect, consequently may wrongly interpret the anatomy. So cautious planning and educator check is important while it is used. Further development and modifications of this AI tool are required to increase its potential to be used in medical education and healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":49461,"journal":{"name":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","volume":"47 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and efficiency of ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 as a tool for scalenovertebral triangle anatomy education.\",\"authors\":\"Anjali Singal, Swati Goyal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00276-024-03513-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As the popularity and the usage of the artificial intelligence (AI) tools is increasing in medical education, it is important to critically evaluate these resources and confirm their reliability. The current study proposes to assess the reliability and effectiveness of ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 for gross anatomical information on scalenovertebral triangle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4 AI tools were used to explore the anatomical information on scalenovertebral triangle eight times on different days. The responses were qualitatively compared to the actual anatomy of the region and comments were made by the authors for each response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The replies given by ChatGPT were not appropriate (either incorrect, partially correct or incomplete) in any of the conversations. There was no major difference between the accuracy of responses, while comparing ChatGPT 3.5 and 4. Almost three out of four times, ChatGPT confused scalenovertebral triangle with scalene or interscalene triangle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>None of the responses provided by ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 across all eight instances aligned even once with the standard anatomical description of the scalenovertebral triangle. A novice medical student may not be able to judge the difference between correct and incorrect, consequently may wrongly interpret the anatomy. So cautious planning and educator check is important while it is used. Further development and modifications of this AI tool are required to increase its potential to be used in medical education and healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-024-03513-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-024-03513-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliability and efficiency of ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 as a tool for scalenovertebral triangle anatomy education.
Purpose: As the popularity and the usage of the artificial intelligence (AI) tools is increasing in medical education, it is important to critically evaluate these resources and confirm their reliability. The current study proposes to assess the reliability and effectiveness of ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 for gross anatomical information on scalenovertebral triangle.
Methods: ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4 AI tools were used to explore the anatomical information on scalenovertebral triangle eight times on different days. The responses were qualitatively compared to the actual anatomy of the region and comments were made by the authors for each response.
Results: The replies given by ChatGPT were not appropriate (either incorrect, partially correct or incomplete) in any of the conversations. There was no major difference between the accuracy of responses, while comparing ChatGPT 3.5 and 4. Almost three out of four times, ChatGPT confused scalenovertebral triangle with scalene or interscalene triangle.
Conclusions: None of the responses provided by ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 across all eight instances aligned even once with the standard anatomical description of the scalenovertebral triangle. A novice medical student may not be able to judge the difference between correct and incorrect, consequently may wrongly interpret the anatomy. So cautious planning and educator check is important while it is used. Further development and modifications of this AI tool are required to increase its potential to be used in medical education and healthcare.
期刊介绍：
Anatomy is a morphological science which cannot fail to interest the clinician. The practical application of anatomical research to clinical problems necessitates special adaptation and selectivity in choosing from numerous international works. Although there is a tendency to believe that meaningful advances in anatomy are unlikely, constant revision is necessary. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, the first international journal of Clinical anatomy has been created in this spirit.
Its goal is to serve clinicians, regardless of speciality-physicians, surgeons, radiologists or other specialists-as an indispensable aid with which they can improve their knowledge of anatomy. Each issue includes: Original papers, review articles, articles on the anatomical bases of medical, surgical and radiological techniques, articles of normal radiologic anatomy, brief reviews of anatomical publications of clinical interest.
Particular attention is given to high quality illustrations, which are indispensable for a better understanding of anatomical problems.
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy is a journal written by anatomists for clinicians with a special interest in anatomy.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
