评估使用虚拟现实和八维音频镇痛方法的分散技术对恢复性手术中儿童疼痛感知和焦虑水平的影响:一项比较体内研究。

Q3 Dentistry
Maheshkumar Karuppiah, Suba Ranjana Balamurugan, Subhathira Rajashekaran, Nagalakshmi Chowdhary, Rajashekar Reddy Vundala, Nikhitha Elsa Shaji
{"title":"评估使用虚拟现实和八维音频镇痛方法的分散技术对恢复性手术中儿童疼痛感知和焦虑水平的影响:一项比较体内研究。","authors":"Maheshkumar Karuppiah, Suba Ranjana Balamurugan, Subhathira Rajashekaran, Nagalakshmi Chowdhary, Rajashekar Reddy Vundala, Nikhitha Elsa Shaji","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dental pain and dental anxiety are the most common determinants of negative dental experience, the reason for broken appointments and ignored oral health care affecting the quality of life.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effects of distraction techniques using virtual reality and eight-dimension (8D) audio analgesia method on pain perception and anxiety levels in children during restorative procedures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 120 children between the ages of 4 and 10 years old who visited for the first time to a pediatric dental department were grouped equally between three interventional groups. Group I was treated with conventional tell-show-do (TSD) method; patients selected for group II (8D audio analgesia) and group III (virtual reality method) underwent two-step procedure that initially involved the TSD technique, by explaining the distraction techniques method conditioned for restoration treatment. Clinical evaluation of anxiety levels was measured by using the Chotta Bheem-Chutki (CBC), face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) scale, and recording pulse and oxygen saturation rate. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by <i>post hoc</i> Tukey's test was done to compare all the parameters between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison to the conventional TSD method, both 8D audio analgesia and virtual reality method showed statistically better results. One-way ANOVA followed by <i>post hoc</i> Tukey's test showed no significant difference between the virtual reality group and 8D audio analgesic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both 8D audio analgesia and virtual reality box distraction techniques can be used as an efficient distraction technique for TSD during dental procedures in children.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Karuppiah M, Balamurugan SR, Rajashekaran S, <i>et al.</i> Evaluation of Effect of Distraction Techniques Using Virtual Reality and Eight-dimension Audio Analgesia Methods on Pain Perception and Anxiety Levels in Children During Restorative Procedures: A Comparative <i>In Vivo</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(10):1087-1092.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"17 10","pages":"1087-1092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Effect of Distraction Techniques Using Virtual Reality and Eight-dimension Audio Analgesia Methods on Pain Perception and Anxiety Levels in Children During Restorative Procedures: A Comparative <i>In Vivo</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Maheshkumar Karuppiah, Suba Ranjana Balamurugan, Subhathira Rajashekaran, Nagalakshmi Chowdhary, Rajashekar Reddy Vundala, Nikhitha Elsa Shaji\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dental pain and dental anxiety are the most common determinants of negative dental experience, the reason for broken appointments and ignored oral health care affecting the quality of life.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effects of distraction techniques using virtual reality and eight-dimension (8D) audio analgesia method on pain perception and anxiety levels in children during restorative procedures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 120 children between the ages of 4 and 10 years old who visited for the first time to a pediatric dental department were grouped equally between three interventional groups. Group I was treated with conventional tell-show-do (TSD) method; patients selected for group II (8D audio analgesia) and group III (virtual reality method) underwent two-step procedure that initially involved the TSD technique, by explaining the distraction techniques method conditioned for restoration treatment. Clinical evaluation of anxiety levels was measured by using the Chotta Bheem-Chutki (CBC), face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) scale, and recording pulse and oxygen saturation rate. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by <i>post hoc</i> Tukey's test was done to compare all the parameters between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison to the conventional TSD method, both 8D audio analgesia and virtual reality method showed statistically better results. One-way ANOVA followed by <i>post hoc</i> Tukey's test showed no significant difference between the virtual reality group and 8D audio analgesic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both 8D audio analgesia and virtual reality box distraction techniques can be used as an efficient distraction technique for TSD during dental procedures in children.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Karuppiah M, Balamurugan SR, Rajashekaran S, <i>et al.</i> Evaluation of Effect of Distraction Techniques Using Virtual Reality and Eight-dimension Audio Analgesia Methods on Pain Perception and Anxiety Levels in Children During Restorative Procedures: A Comparative <i>In Vivo</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(10):1087-1092.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"1087-1092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617436/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2960\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:牙痛和牙焦虑是负面看牙体验最常见的决定因素,是不按时就诊和忽视口腔保健影响生活质量的原因。目的:探讨虚拟现实和八维音频镇痛技术对儿童修复过程中疼痛感知和焦虑水平的影响。材料与方法:将120例4 ~ 10岁首次就诊的儿童平均分为3个干预组。第一组采用常规的“告诉-展示-做”(tell-show-do, TSD)方法;选择II组(8D音频镇痛)和III组(虚拟现实方法)的患者通过解释恢复治疗条件下的分散技术方法,进行了最初涉及TSD技术的两步程序。临床评估焦虑水平采用Chotta bheim - chutki (CBC)、面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安慰(FLACC)量表,并记录脉搏和血氧饱和度。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和事后Tukey检验比较三组间的所有参数。结果:与传统的TSD方法相比,8D音频镇痛和虚拟现实方法均有统计学上更好的效果。单因素方差分析后的事后Tukey检验显示,虚拟现实组与8D音频镇痛组之间无显著差异。结论:8D音频镇痛和虚拟现实盒子牵引技术均可作为儿童牙科手术中创伤后应激障碍的有效牵引技术。本文引用方式:Karuppiah M, Balamurugan SR, Rajashekaran S,等。评估使用虚拟现实和八维音频镇痛方法的分散技术对恢复性手术中儿童疼痛感知和焦虑水平的影响:一项比较体内研究。中华临床儿科杂志;2017;17(10):1087-1092。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Effect of Distraction Techniques Using Virtual Reality and Eight-dimension Audio Analgesia Methods on Pain Perception and Anxiety Levels in Children During Restorative Procedures: A Comparative In Vivo Study.

Introduction: Dental pain and dental anxiety are the most common determinants of negative dental experience, the reason for broken appointments and ignored oral health care affecting the quality of life.

Aim: To evaluate the effects of distraction techniques using virtual reality and eight-dimension (8D) audio analgesia method on pain perception and anxiety levels in children during restorative procedures.

Materials and methods: A total of 120 children between the ages of 4 and 10 years old who visited for the first time to a pediatric dental department were grouped equally between three interventional groups. Group I was treated with conventional tell-show-do (TSD) method; patients selected for group II (8D audio analgesia) and group III (virtual reality method) underwent two-step procedure that initially involved the TSD technique, by explaining the distraction techniques method conditioned for restoration treatment. Clinical evaluation of anxiety levels was measured by using the Chotta Bheem-Chutki (CBC), face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) scale, and recording pulse and oxygen saturation rate. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc Tukey's test was done to compare all the parameters between the three groups.

Results: In comparison to the conventional TSD method, both 8D audio analgesia and virtual reality method showed statistically better results. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey's test showed no significant difference between the virtual reality group and 8D audio analgesic group.

Conclusion: Both 8D audio analgesia and virtual reality box distraction techniques can be used as an efficient distraction technique for TSD during dental procedures in children.

How to cite this article: Karuppiah M, Balamurugan SR, Rajashekaran S, et al. Evaluation of Effect of Distraction Techniques Using Virtual Reality and Eight-dimension Audio Analgesia Methods on Pain Perception and Anxiety Levels in Children During Restorative Procedures: A Comparative In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(10):1087-1092.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信