Anna K Hinterberger, Susanne Mayer, Lena Jiricka, Elisabeth A Waldmann, Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Barbara Majcher, Lisa M Rockenbauer, Michael H Trauner, Monika Ferlitsch
{"title":"筛查性结肠镜检查患者的充分肠道准备:教育程度重要吗?回顾性数据分析。","authors":"Anna K Hinterberger, Susanne Mayer, Lena Jiricka, Elisabeth A Waldmann, Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Barbara Majcher, Lisa M Rockenbauer, Michael H Trauner, Monika Ferlitsch","doi":"10.1007/s00508-024-02468-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In order to achieve a high-quality screening colonoscopy, a high-quality bowel preparation is essential. To perform an adequate bowel cleansing patients need to understand and act on medical information, also known as health literacy. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the patients' educational status as a proxy for health literacy and adequate bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of data collected within the Austrian national colorectal cancer screening program from 2012 to 2022 was conducted. The database contains information on the quality of bowel preparation as well as the academic degree of the patients. Variables were used to perform a logistic regression analysis, with bowel preparation quality (based on the Aronchick scale) as the dependent variable and completed tertiary education as independent variable, and sex and age as control variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 329,778 patients aged 30-99 years were included in the analysis. Within the group of academics, 88.46% (n = 21,883) were adequately prepared whereas in the group of non-academics, 84.79% (n = 258,641) were found to have a high bowel preparation quality. The odds ratio (OR) for academics to have an adequate bowel preparation quality was 1.37 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.32-1.43; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with a tertiary education showed better bowel preparation quality than non-academics in Austria. Therefore, it is important to improve strategies on how to inform also less educated persons to facilitate a better screening colonoscopy quality and to optimize the use of resources from a clinical as well as a public health perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":23861,"journal":{"name":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adequate bowel preparation of patients undergoing screening colonoscopy : Does educational status matter? A retrospective data analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Anna K Hinterberger, Susanne Mayer, Lena Jiricka, Elisabeth A Waldmann, Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Barbara Majcher, Lisa M Rockenbauer, Michael H Trauner, Monika Ferlitsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00508-024-02468-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In order to achieve a high-quality screening colonoscopy, a high-quality bowel preparation is essential. To perform an adequate bowel cleansing patients need to understand and act on medical information, also known as health literacy. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the patients' educational status as a proxy for health literacy and adequate bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of data collected within the Austrian national colorectal cancer screening program from 2012 to 2022 was conducted. The database contains information on the quality of bowel preparation as well as the academic degree of the patients. Variables were used to perform a logistic regression analysis, with bowel preparation quality (based on the Aronchick scale) as the dependent variable and completed tertiary education as independent variable, and sex and age as control variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 329,778 patients aged 30-99 years were included in the analysis. Within the group of academics, 88.46% (n = 21,883) were adequately prepared whereas in the group of non-academics, 84.79% (n = 258,641) were found to have a high bowel preparation quality. The odds ratio (OR) for academics to have an adequate bowel preparation quality was 1.37 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.32-1.43; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with a tertiary education showed better bowel preparation quality than non-academics in Austria. Therefore, it is important to improve strategies on how to inform also less educated persons to facilitate a better screening colonoscopy quality and to optimize the use of resources from a clinical as well as a public health perspective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-024-02468-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-024-02468-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adequate bowel preparation of patients undergoing screening colonoscopy : Does educational status matter? A retrospective data analysis.
Background: In order to achieve a high-quality screening colonoscopy, a high-quality bowel preparation is essential. To perform an adequate bowel cleansing patients need to understand and act on medical information, also known as health literacy. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the patients' educational status as a proxy for health literacy and adequate bowel preparation.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of data collected within the Austrian national colorectal cancer screening program from 2012 to 2022 was conducted. The database contains information on the quality of bowel preparation as well as the academic degree of the patients. Variables were used to perform a logistic regression analysis, with bowel preparation quality (based on the Aronchick scale) as the dependent variable and completed tertiary education as independent variable, and sex and age as control variables.
Results: A total of 329,778 patients aged 30-99 years were included in the analysis. Within the group of academics, 88.46% (n = 21,883) were adequately prepared whereas in the group of non-academics, 84.79% (n = 258,641) were found to have a high bowel preparation quality. The odds ratio (OR) for academics to have an adequate bowel preparation quality was 1.37 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.32-1.43; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Patients with a tertiary education showed better bowel preparation quality than non-academics in Austria. Therefore, it is important to improve strategies on how to inform also less educated persons to facilitate a better screening colonoscopy quality and to optimize the use of resources from a clinical as well as a public health perspective.
期刊介绍:
The Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is an international scientific medical journal covering the entire spectrum of clinical medicine and related areas such as ethics in medicine, public health and the history of medicine. In addition to original articles, the Journal features editorials and leading articles on newly emerging topics, review articles, case reports and a broad range of special articles. Experimental material will be considered for publication if it is directly relevant to clinical medicine. The number of international contributions has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the international reputation of the journal has grown in the past several years. Founded in 1888, the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is certainly one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world and takes pride in having been the first publisher of landmarks in medicine.