支气管内超声引导下微型钳活检用于 PD-L1 表达和组织定量分析的可行性。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Thoracic Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1111/1759-7714.15502
Max T Wayne, Nathaniel G Moulton, Cody Weimholt, Praveen Chenna, Alexander C Chen
{"title":"支气管内超声引导下微型钳活检用于 PD-L1 表达和组织定量分析的可行性。","authors":"Max T Wayne, Nathaniel G Moulton, Cody Weimholt, Praveen Chenna, Alexander C Chen","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.15502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Testing for targeting programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but is only approved for use with core biopsy specimens. Endobronchial ultrasound guided miniforceps biopsy (EBUS-MFB) is an approach to obtain core biopsy material but data assessing the ability of EBUS-MFB to adequately test for PD-L1 is lacking. We evaluate the feasibility of EBUS-MFB to acquire adequate tissue for PD-L1 testing and look to compare the quality of specimens between EBUS-MFB and endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) using a standard method of tissue analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with suspected non-small cell lung cancer undergoing bronchoscopy were recruited for enrollment. For each patient with NSCLC diagnosed on rapid onsite pathology with EBUS-TBNA, EBUS-MFB was performed. PD-L1 immunostaining was completed to assess for adequacy. A comparison of tissue collection was performed using the total surface area measured by digital imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 20 patients, 65% were male with a mean age of 66 years with a total procedure time of 50 min and an average of 14 biopsy passes per procedure. 15 (75%) patients were diagnosed with NSCLC, and PD-L1 analysis was successfully performed in 12 of the 15 (80%). The mean total tissue area obtained by the MFB technique was 9.757 mm<sup>2</sup> compared to 6.941 mm<sup>2</sup> with TBNA (p = 0.427).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this feasibility study, EBUS-MFB was successful in performing PD-L1 testing in 80% of patients with NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"e15502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of Endobronchial Ultrasound Guided Miniforceps Biopsy for PD-L1 Expression and Quantitative Tissue Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Max T Wayne, Nathaniel G Moulton, Cody Weimholt, Praveen Chenna, Alexander C Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1759-7714.15502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Testing for targeting programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but is only approved for use with core biopsy specimens. Endobronchial ultrasound guided miniforceps biopsy (EBUS-MFB) is an approach to obtain core biopsy material but data assessing the ability of EBUS-MFB to adequately test for PD-L1 is lacking. We evaluate the feasibility of EBUS-MFB to acquire adequate tissue for PD-L1 testing and look to compare the quality of specimens between EBUS-MFB and endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) using a standard method of tissue analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with suspected non-small cell lung cancer undergoing bronchoscopy were recruited for enrollment. For each patient with NSCLC diagnosed on rapid onsite pathology with EBUS-TBNA, EBUS-MFB was performed. PD-L1 immunostaining was completed to assess for adequacy. A comparison of tissue collection was performed using the total surface area measured by digital imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 20 patients, 65% were male with a mean age of 66 years with a total procedure time of 50 min and an average of 14 biopsy passes per procedure. 15 (75%) patients were diagnosed with NSCLC, and PD-L1 analysis was successfully performed in 12 of the 15 (80%). The mean total tissue area obtained by the MFB technique was 9.757 mm<sup>2</sup> compared to 6.941 mm<sup>2</sup> with TBNA (p = 0.427).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this feasibility study, EBUS-MFB was successful in performing PD-L1 testing in 80% of patients with NSCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e15502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735461/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15502\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:靶向程序性死亡配体1 (PD-L1)检测是新诊断的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的标准治疗方法,但仅被批准用于核心活检标本。支气管超声引导下小钳活检(EBUS-MFB)是一种获取核心活检材料的方法,但缺乏评估EBUS-MFB充分检测PD-L1能力的数据。我们评估了EBUS-MFB获取足够组织用于PD-L1检测的可行性,并使用标准的组织分析方法比较EBUS-MFB和支气管超声引导下经支气管针抽吸(EBUS-TBNA)的标本质量。方法:选取20例行支气管镜检查的疑似非小细胞肺癌患者作为研究对象。对于每一位通过EBUS-TBNA快速现场病理诊断为NSCLC的患者,进行EBUS-MFB。完成PD-L1免疫染色以评估其充分性。使用数字成像测量的总表面积进行组织收集的比较。结果:20例患者中,65%为男性,平均年龄66岁,总手术时间50分钟,平均每次手术14次活检。15例(75%)患者被诊断为NSCLC,其中12例(80%)患者成功进行了PD-L1分析。MFB法获得的平均总组织面积为9.757 mm2, TBNA法获得的平均总组织面积为6.941 mm2 (p = 0.427)。结论:在这项可行性研究中,EBUS-MFB在80%的非小细胞肺癌患者中成功进行了PD-L1检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of Endobronchial Ultrasound Guided Miniforceps Biopsy for PD-L1 Expression and Quantitative Tissue Analysis.

Background: Testing for targeting programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but is only approved for use with core biopsy specimens. Endobronchial ultrasound guided miniforceps biopsy (EBUS-MFB) is an approach to obtain core biopsy material but data assessing the ability of EBUS-MFB to adequately test for PD-L1 is lacking. We evaluate the feasibility of EBUS-MFB to acquire adequate tissue for PD-L1 testing and look to compare the quality of specimens between EBUS-MFB and endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) using a standard method of tissue analysis.

Methods: Twenty patients with suspected non-small cell lung cancer undergoing bronchoscopy were recruited for enrollment. For each patient with NSCLC diagnosed on rapid onsite pathology with EBUS-TBNA, EBUS-MFB was performed. PD-L1 immunostaining was completed to assess for adequacy. A comparison of tissue collection was performed using the total surface area measured by digital imaging.

Results: Among 20 patients, 65% were male with a mean age of 66 years with a total procedure time of 50 min and an average of 14 biopsy passes per procedure. 15 (75%) patients were diagnosed with NSCLC, and PD-L1 analysis was successfully performed in 12 of the 15 (80%). The mean total tissue area obtained by the MFB technique was 9.757 mm2 compared to 6.941 mm2 with TBNA (p = 0.427).

Conclusion: In this feasibility study, EBUS-MFB was successful in performing PD-L1 testing in 80% of patients with NSCLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thoracic Cancer
Thoracic Cancer ONCOLOGY-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
439
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society. The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信