Coen Butters, Anneke Grobler, Alannah Rudkin, Li-Yin Goh, Heather Werdenburg, Diane Hanna, Theresa Cole, Jim Buttery, Karin Thursky, Andrew Davidson, Gabrielle M Haeusler
{"title":"发热性中性粒细胞减少症(ELSA-FN)儿童早期与晚期停用抗生素的嵌入式随机对照试验方案。","authors":"Coen Butters, Anneke Grobler, Alannah Rudkin, Li-Yin Goh, Heather Werdenburg, Diane Hanna, Theresa Cole, Jim Buttery, Karin Thursky, Andrew Davidson, Gabrielle M Haeusler","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0311523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In children with cancer, febrile neutropenia (FN) is one of the most common complications of treatment, a leading cause of unplanned and prolonged hospital admission and is the key driver of antibiotic exposure. Co-designed with key stakeholders, 'Early versus Late Stopping of Antibiotics in high-risk FN' (ELSA-FN) is a randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial that compares stopping antibiotics in clinically stable patients after 48 hours with the current standard of care, continuing antibiotics until absolute neutrophil recovery. As an Australian first, we will exploit the potential of electronic medical record (EMR) systems, embedding all key aspects of the trial including screening, consent, randomisation and data collection into standard clinical and EMR workflows. We aim to randomise 320 children with high-risk FN and prospectively collect data on safety, acceptability to clinicians and families, as well as several secondary outcomes related to antibiotic exposure. The findings will contribute to optimal antibiotic use in children with FN internationally and inform design and implementation of future EMR-embedded trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 12","pages":"e0311523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11627426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protocol for an embedded randomised controlled trial of Early versus Late Stopping of Antibiotics in children with Febrile Neutropenia (ELSA-FN).\",\"authors\":\"Coen Butters, Anneke Grobler, Alannah Rudkin, Li-Yin Goh, Heather Werdenburg, Diane Hanna, Theresa Cole, Jim Buttery, Karin Thursky, Andrew Davidson, Gabrielle M Haeusler\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0311523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In children with cancer, febrile neutropenia (FN) is one of the most common complications of treatment, a leading cause of unplanned and prolonged hospital admission and is the key driver of antibiotic exposure. Co-designed with key stakeholders, 'Early versus Late Stopping of Antibiotics in high-risk FN' (ELSA-FN) is a randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial that compares stopping antibiotics in clinically stable patients after 48 hours with the current standard of care, continuing antibiotics until absolute neutrophil recovery. As an Australian first, we will exploit the potential of electronic medical record (EMR) systems, embedding all key aspects of the trial including screening, consent, randomisation and data collection into standard clinical and EMR workflows. We aim to randomise 320 children with high-risk FN and prospectively collect data on safety, acceptability to clinicians and families, as well as several secondary outcomes related to antibiotic exposure. The findings will contribute to optimal antibiotic use in children with FN internationally and inform design and implementation of future EMR-embedded trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"19 12\",\"pages\":\"e0311523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11627426/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311523\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Protocol for an embedded randomised controlled trial of Early versus Late Stopping of Antibiotics in children with Febrile Neutropenia (ELSA-FN).
In children with cancer, febrile neutropenia (FN) is one of the most common complications of treatment, a leading cause of unplanned and prolonged hospital admission and is the key driver of antibiotic exposure. Co-designed with key stakeholders, 'Early versus Late Stopping of Antibiotics in high-risk FN' (ELSA-FN) is a randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial that compares stopping antibiotics in clinically stable patients after 48 hours with the current standard of care, continuing antibiotics until absolute neutrophil recovery. As an Australian first, we will exploit the potential of electronic medical record (EMR) systems, embedding all key aspects of the trial including screening, consent, randomisation and data collection into standard clinical and EMR workflows. We aim to randomise 320 children with high-risk FN and prospectively collect data on safety, acceptability to clinicians and families, as well as several secondary outcomes related to antibiotic exposure. The findings will contribute to optimal antibiotic use in children with FN internationally and inform design and implementation of future EMR-embedded trials.
期刊介绍:
PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides:
* Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright
* Fast publication times
* Peer review by expert, practicing researchers
* Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact
* Community-based dialogue on articles
* Worldwide media coverage