回忆疗法改善认知衰退的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1007/s10072-024-07905-x
Yuanhang Han, Bin Zhu, Delong Huang, Youyu Lan, Haoshu Zhong, Yongqin Zhang, Hemu Zhou, Chengzhen Liu, Ping Zhou
{"title":"回忆疗法改善认知衰退的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yuanhang Han, Bin Zhu, Delong Huang, Youyu Lan, Haoshu Zhong, Yongqin Zhang, Hemu Zhou, Chengzhen Liu, Ping Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07905-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>‌ Reminiscence therapy(RT) is used in the care of people with dementia to help improve their quality of life, but the efficacy of RT in various cognitive decline populations is unclear, and long-term effects are not sufficiently evidenced.This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the efficacy of RT in improving cognitive decline and provide evidence for its implementation in care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search strategy utilizing MeSH terms and free-text keywords was employed to systematically search the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases up to January 24, 2024. Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) investigating RT monotherapy for improving cognitive decline were included. The primary outcomes of interest were the standard Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Additionally, all data analyses will be performed using RevMan5.4 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>‌ We identified 612 studies, and 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 2650 participants. This meta-analysis shows that RT significantly improves immediate and long-term cognitive decline with Standardized Mean Difference(SMD) and 95% CI of 0.55 [0.37, 0.73] and 0.50 [0.11, 0.88], respectively. However, there is no significant difference in efficacy between subgroups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>‌ Our findings suggestS that RT significantly improves cognitive decline, with no significant differences between subgroups. This suggests that RT is universal in improving cognition and that the way RT is implemented has no significant effect on outcomes. These findings supportS the use of RT as a reliable non-pharmacological treatment option to enhance cognitive function.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1087-1101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of reminiscence therapy in improving cognitive decline: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yuanhang Han, Bin Zhu, Delong Huang, Youyu Lan, Haoshu Zhong, Yongqin Zhang, Hemu Zhou, Chengzhen Liu, Ping Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10072-024-07905-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>‌ Reminiscence therapy(RT) is used in the care of people with dementia to help improve their quality of life, but the efficacy of RT in various cognitive decline populations is unclear, and long-term effects are not sufficiently evidenced.This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the efficacy of RT in improving cognitive decline and provide evidence for its implementation in care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search strategy utilizing MeSH terms and free-text keywords was employed to systematically search the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases up to January 24, 2024. Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) investigating RT monotherapy for improving cognitive decline were included. The primary outcomes of interest were the standard Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Additionally, all data analyses will be performed using RevMan5.4 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>‌ We identified 612 studies, and 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 2650 participants. This meta-analysis shows that RT significantly improves immediate and long-term cognitive decline with Standardized Mean Difference(SMD) and 95% CI of 0.55 [0.37, 0.73] and 0.50 [0.11, 0.88], respectively. However, there is no significant difference in efficacy between subgroups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>‌ Our findings suggestS that RT significantly improves cognitive decline, with no significant differences between subgroups. This suggests that RT is universal in improving cognition and that the way RT is implemented has no significant effect on outcomes. These findings supportS the use of RT as a reliable non-pharmacological treatment option to enhance cognitive function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1087-1101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07905-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07905-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:·回忆疗法(Reminiscence therapy, RT)被用于痴呆症患者的护理,以帮助改善他们的生活质量,但RT在各种认知能力下降人群中的疗效尚不清楚,长期效果也没有充分的证据。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定RT在改善认知能力下降方面的疗效,并为其在护理中的实施提供证据。方法:采用基于MeSH术语和自由文本关键词的综合检索策略,系统检索Embase、PubMed和Cochrane数据库,检索时间截止到2024年1月24日。随机对照试验(rct)调查RT单药治疗改善认知衰退。主要研究结果为标准迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)得分。此外,所有数据分析将使用RevMan5.4软件进行。我们确定了612项研究,其中24项研究符合纳入标准,涉及2650名受试者。该荟萃分析显示,RT显著改善了近期和长期认知衰退,标准化平均差(SMD)和95% CI分别为0.55[0.37,0.73]和0.50[0.11,0.88]。但亚组间疗效差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。我们的研究结果表明,RT可显著改善认知能力下降,亚组间无显著差异。这表明,RT在改善认知方面是普遍存在的,而RT的实施方式对结果没有显著影响。这些发现支持将RT作为一种可靠的非药物治疗选择来增强认知功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of reminiscence therapy in improving cognitive decline: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: ‌ Reminiscence therapy(RT) is used in the care of people with dementia to help improve their quality of life, but the efficacy of RT in various cognitive decline populations is unclear, and long-term effects are not sufficiently evidenced.This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the efficacy of RT in improving cognitive decline and provide evidence for its implementation in care.

Methods: A comprehensive search strategy utilizing MeSH terms and free-text keywords was employed to systematically search the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases up to January 24, 2024. Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) investigating RT monotherapy for improving cognitive decline were included. The primary outcomes of interest were the standard Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Additionally, all data analyses will be performed using RevMan5.4 software.

Results: ‌ We identified 612 studies, and 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 2650 participants. This meta-analysis shows that RT significantly improves immediate and long-term cognitive decline with Standardized Mean Difference(SMD) and 95% CI of 0.55 [0.37, 0.73] and 0.50 [0.11, 0.88], respectively. However, there is no significant difference in efficacy between subgroups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: ‌ Our findings suggestS that RT significantly improves cognitive decline, with no significant differences between subgroups. This suggests that RT is universal in improving cognition and that the way RT is implemented has no significant effect on outcomes. These findings supportS the use of RT as a reliable non-pharmacological treatment option to enhance cognitive function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信