Maureen van Dam, Jantine G Röttgering, Ilse M Nauta, Brigit A de Jong, Martin Klein, Menno M Schoonheim, Bernard Mj Uitdehaag, Hanneke E Hulst, Linda Douw
{"title":"了解多发性硬化症患者客观评估的认知和自我报告的心理症状的复杂网络","authors":"Maureen van Dam, Jantine G Röttgering, Ilse M Nauta, Brigit A de Jong, Martin Klein, Menno M Schoonheim, Bernard Mj Uitdehaag, Hanneke E Hulst, Linda Douw","doi":"10.1177/13524585241302173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Literature on the intricate relationship between self-reported and objectively assessed cognitive functioning suggests a discrepancy between self-reported cognitive complaints (SCC) and actual test performance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the interplay between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective cognitive functioning using network analysis in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected PROMs on anxiety, depression, fatigue and SCC, and cognitive functioning across six domains (<i>n</i> = 703 PwMS; 71% female, mean age = 46.3 ± 11.2 years). We constructed cognitive symptom networks using Gaussian Graphical Models, in which the aforementioned variables were presented as nodes linked by regularized partial correlations. We compared global network strength between relevant subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The networks primarily showed clustering of PROMs and cognitive domains into two separate modules, with weaker links connecting both modules. Global network strength was lower for PwMS with impaired information processing speed (IPS; indicating lower symptom interrelatedness) compared to those with preserved IPS (3.57 versus 4.51, <i>p</i> = 0.001), but not when comparing SCC subgroups (<i>p</i> = 0.140).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive symptom networks deepen our understanding of the discrepancy between self-reported and objectively assessed cognitive functioning. Lower symptom interrelatedness in PwMS with impaired IPS might suggest a nonlinear relation between PROMs and cognitive domains, which depends on the cognitive status.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":" ","pages":"93-106"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the complex network of objectively assessed cognition and self-reported psychological symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Maureen van Dam, Jantine G Röttgering, Ilse M Nauta, Brigit A de Jong, Martin Klein, Menno M Schoonheim, Bernard Mj Uitdehaag, Hanneke E Hulst, Linda Douw\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13524585241302173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Literature on the intricate relationship between self-reported and objectively assessed cognitive functioning suggests a discrepancy between self-reported cognitive complaints (SCC) and actual test performance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the interplay between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective cognitive functioning using network analysis in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected PROMs on anxiety, depression, fatigue and SCC, and cognitive functioning across six domains (<i>n</i> = 703 PwMS; 71% female, mean age = 46.3 ± 11.2 years). We constructed cognitive symptom networks using Gaussian Graphical Models, in which the aforementioned variables were presented as nodes linked by regularized partial correlations. We compared global network strength between relevant subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The networks primarily showed clustering of PROMs and cognitive domains into two separate modules, with weaker links connecting both modules. Global network strength was lower for PwMS with impaired information processing speed (IPS; indicating lower symptom interrelatedness) compared to those with preserved IPS (3.57 versus 4.51, <i>p</i> = 0.001), but not when comparing SCC subgroups (<i>p</i> = 0.140).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive symptom networks deepen our understanding of the discrepancy between self-reported and objectively assessed cognitive functioning. Lower symptom interrelatedness in PwMS with impaired IPS might suggest a nonlinear relation between PROMs and cognitive domains, which depends on the cognitive status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"93-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720265/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585241302173\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585241302173","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:关于自我报告和客观评估认知功能之间复杂关系的文献表明,自我报告的认知抱怨(SCC)与实际测试表现之间存在差异。目的:利用网络分析研究多发性硬化症(PwMS)患者报告的预后指标(PROMs)与客观认知功能之间的相互作用。方法:我们收集了6个领域的焦虑、抑郁、疲劳和SCC以及认知功能的prom (n = 703 PwMS;女性71%,平均年龄= 46.3±11.2岁)。我们使用高斯图形模型构建认知症状网络,其中上述变量以正则化偏相关连接的节点表示。我们比较了相关子群体之间的全球网络强度。结果:该网络主要表现为PROMs和认知领域的聚类为两个独立的模块,连接两个模块的链路较弱。信息处理速度受损的PwMS整体网络强度较低;与保留IPS的患者相比(3.57 vs 4.51, p = 0.001),表明症状相关性较低,但在比较SCC亚组时则不然(p = 0.140)。结论:认知症状网络加深了我们对自我报告和客观评估的认知功能差异的理解。脑功能障碍患者的症状相关性较低,这可能表明脑功能障碍与认知领域之间存在非线性关系,这种关系取决于认知状态。
Understanding the complex network of objectively assessed cognition and self-reported psychological symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis.
Background: Literature on the intricate relationship between self-reported and objectively assessed cognitive functioning suggests a discrepancy between self-reported cognitive complaints (SCC) and actual test performance.
Objectives: To investigate the interplay between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective cognitive functioning using network analysis in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS).
Methods: We collected PROMs on anxiety, depression, fatigue and SCC, and cognitive functioning across six domains (n = 703 PwMS; 71% female, mean age = 46.3 ± 11.2 years). We constructed cognitive symptom networks using Gaussian Graphical Models, in which the aforementioned variables were presented as nodes linked by regularized partial correlations. We compared global network strength between relevant subgroups.
Results: The networks primarily showed clustering of PROMs and cognitive domains into two separate modules, with weaker links connecting both modules. Global network strength was lower for PwMS with impaired information processing speed (IPS; indicating lower symptom interrelatedness) compared to those with preserved IPS (3.57 versus 4.51, p = 0.001), but not when comparing SCC subgroups (p = 0.140).
Conclusions: Cognitive symptom networks deepen our understanding of the discrepancy between self-reported and objectively assessed cognitive functioning. Lower symptom interrelatedness in PwMS with impaired IPS might suggest a nonlinear relation between PROMs and cognitive domains, which depends on the cognitive status.
期刊介绍:
Multiple Sclerosis Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on all aspects of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica and other related autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system.
The journal for your research in the following areas:
* __Biologic basis:__ pathology, myelin biology, pathophysiology of the blood/brain barrier, axo-glial pathobiology, remyelination, virology and microbiome, immunology, proteomics
* __Epidemology and genetics:__ genetics epigenetics, epidemiology
* __Clinical and Neuroimaging:__ clinical neurology, biomarkers, neuroimaging and clinical outcome measures
* __Therapeutics and rehabilitation:__ therapeutics, rehabilitation, psychology, neuroplasticity, neuroprotection, and systematic management
Print ISSN: 1352-4585