评估大学生食品素养试点项目的有效性:使用混合方法研究方法。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrition Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI:10.4162/nrp.2024.18.6.885
Eunji Ko, Eunjin Jang, Jiwon Sim, Minjeong Jeong, Sohyun Park
{"title":"评估大学生食品素养试点项目的有效性:使用混合方法研究方法。","authors":"Eunji Ko, Eunjin Jang, Jiwon Sim, Minjeong Jeong, Sohyun Park","doi":"10.4162/nrp.2024.18.6.885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>As awareness of climate change increases, the relevance of environmental education in dietary choices gains prominence. Although diversely defined, food literacy (FL) is increasingly recognized as the ability to make food choices with an awareness of environmental sustainability. This study aims to conduct a pilot implementation and assess the effectiveness of a program developed to improve FL among university students.</p><p><strong>Subjects/methods: </strong>The study spanned from August 2022 to February 2023, involving 92 participants (42 in the intervention group and 50 in the control group). Over 11 weeks, the program included cooking classes, local farm visits, and environmental impact lectures developed through extensive literature reviews and interviews with students and experts. FL was measured using a 33-item survey along with basic sociodemographic factors. After the intervention, both groups participated in qualitative interviews. All statistical analyses were carried out in Stata/SE version 17.0, and interview data were analyzed in Microsoft Excel using the framework analysis method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FL scores of the intervention group improved significantly from an average of 65.8 to 69.6 points (<i>P</i> = 0.015), with notable gains in the socio-ecological domain in FL from 65.3 to 71.5 points (<i>P</i> < 0.001). A linear regression analysis comparing FL between the intervention and control groups found that only the knowledge items were marginally significant (<i>P</i> = 0.054), with no statistically significant difference in the practice aspect before and after the intervention (<i>P</i> = 0.657). The interviews revealed that the intervention group experienced broadened perspectives and heightened environmental consciousness, although translating these into practice was challenged by unchanged daily routines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot program effectively enhanced some aspects of FL-related knowledge of participants. High satisfaction among participants and no dropouts indicated its potential for scaling. Future programs will benefit from strategies that facilitate the transition from educational improvement to practical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":19232,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Research and Practice","volume":"18 6","pages":"885-896"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the effectiveness of a food literacy pilot program for university students: using a mixed-methods research approach.\",\"authors\":\"Eunji Ko, Eunjin Jang, Jiwon Sim, Minjeong Jeong, Sohyun Park\",\"doi\":\"10.4162/nrp.2024.18.6.885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>As awareness of climate change increases, the relevance of environmental education in dietary choices gains prominence. Although diversely defined, food literacy (FL) is increasingly recognized as the ability to make food choices with an awareness of environmental sustainability. This study aims to conduct a pilot implementation and assess the effectiveness of a program developed to improve FL among university students.</p><p><strong>Subjects/methods: </strong>The study spanned from August 2022 to February 2023, involving 92 participants (42 in the intervention group and 50 in the control group). Over 11 weeks, the program included cooking classes, local farm visits, and environmental impact lectures developed through extensive literature reviews and interviews with students and experts. FL was measured using a 33-item survey along with basic sociodemographic factors. After the intervention, both groups participated in qualitative interviews. All statistical analyses were carried out in Stata/SE version 17.0, and interview data were analyzed in Microsoft Excel using the framework analysis method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FL scores of the intervention group improved significantly from an average of 65.8 to 69.6 points (<i>P</i> = 0.015), with notable gains in the socio-ecological domain in FL from 65.3 to 71.5 points (<i>P</i> < 0.001). A linear regression analysis comparing FL between the intervention and control groups found that only the knowledge items were marginally significant (<i>P</i> = 0.054), with no statistically significant difference in the practice aspect before and after the intervention (<i>P</i> = 0.657). The interviews revealed that the intervention group experienced broadened perspectives and heightened environmental consciousness, although translating these into practice was challenged by unchanged daily routines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot program effectively enhanced some aspects of FL-related knowledge of participants. High satisfaction among participants and no dropouts indicated its potential for scaling. Future programs will benefit from strategies that facilitate the transition from educational improvement to practical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"885-896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621428/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2024.18.6.885\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2024.18.6.885","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目标:随着人们对气候变化意识的提高,环境教育在饮食选择中的重要性日益突出。尽管定义不同,但食品素养(FL)越来越被认为是一种具有环境可持续性意识的食物选择能力。本研究旨在进行一项试点实施,并评估一项旨在提高大学生外语水平的计划的有效性。研究对象/方法:研究时间为2022年8月至2023年2月,共92名参与者(干预组42人,对照组50人)。在11周的时间里,该项目包括烹饪课、当地农场参观和环境影响讲座,这些讲座是通过广泛的文献回顾和对学生和专家的采访而形成的。使用一项33项的调查以及基本的社会人口学因素来测量FL。干预后,两组均参加定性访谈。所有统计分析均在Stata/SE 17.0版本中进行,访谈数据在Microsoft Excel中使用框架分析法进行分析。结果:干预组的FL得分从平均65.8分提高到69.6分(P = 0.015),社会生态领域的FL得分从65.3分提高到71.5分(P < 0.001)。对干预组与对照组的FL进行线性回归分析发现,干预前后只有知识项有边际显著性差异(P = 0.054),实践方面差异无统计学意义(P = 0.657)。访谈显示,干预组经历了更开阔的视野和更高的环保意识,尽管将这些转化为实践受到不变的日常生活的挑战。结论:该试点项目有效地提高了参试者在外语相关方面的知识水平。参与者的高满意度和无辍学率表明其具有扩大规模的潜力。未来的项目将受益于促进从教育改进到实际应用的转变的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the effectiveness of a food literacy pilot program for university students: using a mixed-methods research approach.

Background/objectives: As awareness of climate change increases, the relevance of environmental education in dietary choices gains prominence. Although diversely defined, food literacy (FL) is increasingly recognized as the ability to make food choices with an awareness of environmental sustainability. This study aims to conduct a pilot implementation and assess the effectiveness of a program developed to improve FL among university students.

Subjects/methods: The study spanned from August 2022 to February 2023, involving 92 participants (42 in the intervention group and 50 in the control group). Over 11 weeks, the program included cooking classes, local farm visits, and environmental impact lectures developed through extensive literature reviews and interviews with students and experts. FL was measured using a 33-item survey along with basic sociodemographic factors. After the intervention, both groups participated in qualitative interviews. All statistical analyses were carried out in Stata/SE version 17.0, and interview data were analyzed in Microsoft Excel using the framework analysis method.

Results: The FL scores of the intervention group improved significantly from an average of 65.8 to 69.6 points (P = 0.015), with notable gains in the socio-ecological domain in FL from 65.3 to 71.5 points (P < 0.001). A linear regression analysis comparing FL between the intervention and control groups found that only the knowledge items were marginally significant (P = 0.054), with no statistically significant difference in the practice aspect before and after the intervention (P = 0.657). The interviews revealed that the intervention group experienced broadened perspectives and heightened environmental consciousness, although translating these into practice was challenged by unchanged daily routines.

Conclusion: This pilot program effectively enhanced some aspects of FL-related knowledge of participants. High satisfaction among participants and no dropouts indicated its potential for scaling. Future programs will benefit from strategies that facilitate the transition from educational improvement to practical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition Research and Practice
Nutrition Research and Practice NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Research and Practice (NRP) is an official journal, jointly published by the Korean Nutrition Society and the Korean Society of Community Nutrition since 2007. The journal had been published quarterly at the initial stage and has been published bimonthly since 2010. NRP aims to stimulate research and practice across diverse areas of human nutrition. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts on nutrition biochemistry and metabolism, community nutrition, nutrition and disease management, nutritional epidemiology, nutrition education, foodservice management in the following categories: Original Research Articles, Notes, Communications, and Reviews. Reviews will be received by the invitation of the editors only. Statements made and opinions expressed in the manuscripts published in this Journal represent the views of authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信