Danielle G Tsevat, Brooke W Bullington, Kavita S Arora, Bianca A Allison
{"title":"美国临床医生对青少年堕胎咨询的看法和行为。","authors":"Danielle G Tsevat, Brooke W Bullington, Kavita S Arora, Bianca A Allison","doi":"10.1016/j.jpag.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To determine clinician factors associated with discussing abortion during pregnancy options counseling among adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited and surveyed a convenience sample of U.S. clinicians who care for pregnant adolescent patients (N=146). Clinicians were recruited at a national conference, through listservs, and via a physician mailing list. We used chi-square tests to analyze differences in our primary outcomes (routinely discussing abortion, routinely providing abortion referrals, and not routinely advising patients seeking abortion against termination) by clinician demographics, beliefs, and practice settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven percent of clinicians reported routinely discussing abortion with adolescent patients, 58% routinely referred for abortion, and 76% did not routinely advise against termination. Female gender, pediatric specialty, and practicing in an academic setting were associated with routinely referring for abortion and not routinely counseling against abortion (p<0.05). Additionally, state abortion laws at the time of the survey were associated with abortion discussion and referrals. Having \"a personal objection to abortion\" or \"belief that abortion will harm patients\" were negatively associated with each outcome (p <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinician demographics and personal beliefs were associated with differences among counseling. Although this was a small exploratory study, our findings highlight important clinician-level barriers to adolescents' access to abortion counseling and care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16708,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beliefs and behaviors regarding abortion counseling among U.S. clinicians caring for adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle G Tsevat, Brooke W Bullington, Kavita S Arora, Bianca A Allison\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpag.2024.12.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To determine clinician factors associated with discussing abortion during pregnancy options counseling among adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited and surveyed a convenience sample of U.S. clinicians who care for pregnant adolescent patients (N=146). Clinicians were recruited at a national conference, through listservs, and via a physician mailing list. We used chi-square tests to analyze differences in our primary outcomes (routinely discussing abortion, routinely providing abortion referrals, and not routinely advising patients seeking abortion against termination) by clinician demographics, beliefs, and practice settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven percent of clinicians reported routinely discussing abortion with adolescent patients, 58% routinely referred for abortion, and 76% did not routinely advise against termination. Female gender, pediatric specialty, and practicing in an academic setting were associated with routinely referring for abortion and not routinely counseling against abortion (p<0.05). Additionally, state abortion laws at the time of the survey were associated with abortion discussion and referrals. Having \\\"a personal objection to abortion\\\" or \\\"belief that abortion will harm patients\\\" were negatively associated with each outcome (p <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinician demographics and personal beliefs were associated with differences among counseling. Although this was a small exploratory study, our findings highlight important clinician-level barriers to adolescents' access to abortion counseling and care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2024.12.004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2024.12.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beliefs and behaviors regarding abortion counseling among U.S. clinicians caring for adolescents.
Study objective: To determine clinician factors associated with discussing abortion during pregnancy options counseling among adolescents.
Methods: We recruited and surveyed a convenience sample of U.S. clinicians who care for pregnant adolescent patients (N=146). Clinicians were recruited at a national conference, through listservs, and via a physician mailing list. We used chi-square tests to analyze differences in our primary outcomes (routinely discussing abortion, routinely providing abortion referrals, and not routinely advising patients seeking abortion against termination) by clinician demographics, beliefs, and practice settings.
Results: Fifty-seven percent of clinicians reported routinely discussing abortion with adolescent patients, 58% routinely referred for abortion, and 76% did not routinely advise against termination. Female gender, pediatric specialty, and practicing in an academic setting were associated with routinely referring for abortion and not routinely counseling against abortion (p<0.05). Additionally, state abortion laws at the time of the survey were associated with abortion discussion and referrals. Having "a personal objection to abortion" or "belief that abortion will harm patients" were negatively associated with each outcome (p <0.05).
Conclusion: Clinician demographics and personal beliefs were associated with differences among counseling. Although this was a small exploratory study, our findings highlight important clinician-level barriers to adolescents' access to abortion counseling and care.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology includes all aspects of clinical and basic science research in pediatric and adolescent gynecology. The Journal draws on expertise from a variety of disciplines including pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, reproduction and gynecology, reproductive and pediatric endocrinology, genetics, and molecular biology.
The Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology features original studies, review articles, book and literature reviews, letters to the editor, and communications in brief. It is an essential resource for the libraries of OB/GYN specialists, as well as pediatricians and primary care physicians.