视力测量对眼科急诊室分诊效率的影响。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Hoi Ying Emily Chan, Jonathan S C Cheng, Adam Bharmal, Velota Ct Sung
{"title":"视力测量对眼科急诊室分诊效率的影响。","authors":"Hoi Ying Emily Chan, Jonathan S C Cheng, Adam Bharmal, Velota Ct Sung","doi":"10.1007/s00417-024-06705-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The effect of pre-triage visual acuity (VA) measurement on triage accuracy in a busy ophthalmic casualty department was investigated as a possible means to improve triage quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All 576 patients attending the accident and emergency department (A&E) at the Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre (BMEC) over a period of 4 days were included in this prospective cross-sectional study. Patients were assigned to two groups: those who underwent a VA measurement prior to triage (n = 242) and a control group who did not have a VA measurement (n = 234). Clinicians who were masked from the allocation also assessed whether they agreed with the triage decision after assessing each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Triage outcomes were recorded for 469 (81%) patients. Those with a pre-triage VA measurement were more likely to be assessed as more urgent (p = 0.005) and less likely to be discharged (p = 0.04). 248 (43%) patients had clinician response with corresponding triage records, of which 136 (55%) had prior VA measurement and 112 (45%) were in the control group. Clinicians responded that patients with VA measurement prior to triage were more accurately triaged than the control group (66% and 54%; p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VA measurement prior to triage can help improve triage accuracy and allow better allocation of resources at an overcrowded eye-dedicated emergency department. However, waiting times may increase due to longer triage duration and more patients to be triaged into urgent pathway. Greater staffing resources may be necessary to complement the proposed change to avoid undermining triage efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of visual acuity measurement on triage effectiveness in an ophthalmic emergency department.\",\"authors\":\"Hoi Ying Emily Chan, Jonathan S C Cheng, Adam Bharmal, Velota Ct Sung\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00417-024-06705-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The effect of pre-triage visual acuity (VA) measurement on triage accuracy in a busy ophthalmic casualty department was investigated as a possible means to improve triage quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All 576 patients attending the accident and emergency department (A&E) at the Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre (BMEC) over a period of 4 days were included in this prospective cross-sectional study. Patients were assigned to two groups: those who underwent a VA measurement prior to triage (n = 242) and a control group who did not have a VA measurement (n = 234). Clinicians who were masked from the allocation also assessed whether they agreed with the triage decision after assessing each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Triage outcomes were recorded for 469 (81%) patients. Those with a pre-triage VA measurement were more likely to be assessed as more urgent (p = 0.005) and less likely to be discharged (p = 0.04). 248 (43%) patients had clinician response with corresponding triage records, of which 136 (55%) had prior VA measurement and 112 (45%) were in the control group. Clinicians responded that patients with VA measurement prior to triage were more accurately triaged than the control group (66% and 54%; p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VA measurement prior to triage can help improve triage accuracy and allow better allocation of resources at an overcrowded eye-dedicated emergency department. However, waiting times may increase due to longer triage duration and more patients to be triaged into urgent pathway. Greater staffing resources may be necessary to complement the proposed change to avoid undermining triage efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06705-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06705-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨分诊前视敏度(VA)测量对繁忙的眼科伤病科分诊准确性的影响,为提高分诊质量提供可能的手段。方法:576名在伯明翰和米德兰眼科中心(BMEC)急诊科(A&E)就诊4天的患者被纳入这项前瞻性横断面研究。患者被分为两组:在分诊前进行了VA测量的患者(n = 242)和未进行VA测量的对照组(n = 234)。没有参与分配的临床医生在评估每位患者后也评估了他们是否同意分诊决定。结果:469例(81%)患者记录了分诊结果。那些有分流前VA测量的患者更有可能被评估为更紧急(p = 0.005),更不可能出院(p = 0.04)。248例(43%)患者有临床反应并有相应的分诊记录,其中136例(55%)患者有VA测量,对照组112例(45%)。临床医生回应说,在分诊前进行VA测量的患者比对照组更准确地进行了分诊(66%和54%;p = 0.03)。结论:分诊前VA测量有助于提高分诊准确性,并在人满为患的眼科急诊科更好地分配资源。然而,等待时间可能会增加,因为较长的分诊时间和更多的患者需要分诊到紧急途径。可能需要更多的工作人员资源来补充拟议的变更,以避免损害分诊效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of visual acuity measurement on triage effectiveness in an ophthalmic emergency department.

Purpose: The effect of pre-triage visual acuity (VA) measurement on triage accuracy in a busy ophthalmic casualty department was investigated as a possible means to improve triage quality.

Methods: All 576 patients attending the accident and emergency department (A&E) at the Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre (BMEC) over a period of 4 days were included in this prospective cross-sectional study. Patients were assigned to two groups: those who underwent a VA measurement prior to triage (n = 242) and a control group who did not have a VA measurement (n = 234). Clinicians who were masked from the allocation also assessed whether they agreed with the triage decision after assessing each patient.

Results: Triage outcomes were recorded for 469 (81%) patients. Those with a pre-triage VA measurement were more likely to be assessed as more urgent (p = 0.005) and less likely to be discharged (p = 0.04). 248 (43%) patients had clinician response with corresponding triage records, of which 136 (55%) had prior VA measurement and 112 (45%) were in the control group. Clinicians responded that patients with VA measurement prior to triage were more accurately triaged than the control group (66% and 54%; p = 0.03).

Conclusion: VA measurement prior to triage can help improve triage accuracy and allow better allocation of resources at an overcrowded eye-dedicated emergency department. However, waiting times may increase due to longer triage duration and more patients to be triaged into urgent pathway. Greater staffing resources may be necessary to complement the proposed change to avoid undermining triage efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信