膜稳定对牙周受损拔牙槽位牙槽嵴保存的影响:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Seung-Ju Lee, Jungwon Lee, Hyemee Suh, Young-Chang Ko, Istvan Urban, Ki-Tae Koo
{"title":"膜稳定对牙周受损拔牙槽位牙槽嵴保存的影响:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。","authors":"Seung-Ju Lee, Jungwon Lee, Hyemee Suh, Young-Chang Ko, Istvan Urban, Ki-Tae Koo","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.14092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the non-inferiority of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with membrane stabilization compared with non-stabilization, focusing on changes of soft-tissue contour in periodontally compromised extraction sockets. Secondary outcomes included changes in hard-tissue contour, patient-reported outcomes and new bone formation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-four patients with periodontally compromised teeth were randomly assigned to ARP with (test group) or without (control group) membrane stabilization. To assess profilometric and hard-tissue dimensional changes, dental impressions and cone beam computed tomography scans were performed at baseline (T0), immediately after ARP (T1) and 4 months post surgery (T2). Soft-tissue healing in open healing sites was evaluated at T2, and wound closure was assessed 10 days post surgery. Patient-reported outcomes were documented, and core biopsies were obtained for histomorphometric analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The absolute profilometric horizontal width change at 3 mm below the crest in the test group was not inferior to that in the control group. For the relative values, horizontal width reduction (3 and 5 mm below the crest) and volumetric shrinkage (3-5 mm below the crest) were lower in the test group. No significant differences were observed in bone dimensional changes, wound healing, pain and swelling or histomorphometric outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ARP with membrane stabilization in periodontally compromised extraction sockets is non-inferior in terms of soft-tissue contour changes to those without membrane fixation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), KCT0005280. Registered 4 August 2020, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=19165&search_page=L.</p>","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Membrane Stabilization for Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Periodontally Compromised Extraction Sockets: A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Seung-Ju Lee, Jungwon Lee, Hyemee Suh, Young-Chang Ko, Istvan Urban, Ki-Tae Koo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcpe.14092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the non-inferiority of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with membrane stabilization compared with non-stabilization, focusing on changes of soft-tissue contour in periodontally compromised extraction sockets. Secondary outcomes included changes in hard-tissue contour, patient-reported outcomes and new bone formation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-four patients with periodontally compromised teeth were randomly assigned to ARP with (test group) or without (control group) membrane stabilization. To assess profilometric and hard-tissue dimensional changes, dental impressions and cone beam computed tomography scans were performed at baseline (T0), immediately after ARP (T1) and 4 months post surgery (T2). Soft-tissue healing in open healing sites was evaluated at T2, and wound closure was assessed 10 days post surgery. Patient-reported outcomes were documented, and core biopsies were obtained for histomorphometric analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The absolute profilometric horizontal width change at 3 mm below the crest in the test group was not inferior to that in the control group. For the relative values, horizontal width reduction (3 and 5 mm below the crest) and volumetric shrinkage (3-5 mm below the crest) were lower in the test group. No significant differences were observed in bone dimensional changes, wound healing, pain and swelling or histomorphometric outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ARP with membrane stabilization in periodontally compromised extraction sockets is non-inferior in terms of soft-tissue contour changes to those without membrane fixation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), KCT0005280. Registered 4 August 2020, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=19165&search_page=L.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Periodontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14092\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14092","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是探讨膜稳定的牙槽嵴保存(ARP)与不稳定的牙槽嵴保存(ARP)的非劣效性,重点研究牙周受损拔牙槽位软组织轮廓的变化。次要结果包括硬组织轮廓的改变、患者报告的结果和新骨形成。材料与方法:将24例牙周受损牙患者随机分为有膜稳定组(试验组)和无膜稳定组(对照组)。为了评估轮廓和硬组织尺寸的变化,分别在基线(T0)、即刻ARP (T1)和术后4个月(T2)进行牙印和锥形束计算机断层扫描。T2时评估开放愈合部位的软组织愈合情况,术后10天评估伤口愈合情况。记录了患者报告的结果,并进行了核心活检以进行组织形态学分析。结果:实验组在峰下3mm处的绝对廓形水平宽度变化不逊于对照组。相对而言,实验组的水平宽度减小(低于峰值3和5 mm)和体积收缩(低于峰值3-5 mm)均较低。在骨尺寸变化、伤口愈合、疼痛和肿胀或组织形态学结果方面没有观察到显著差异。结论:在牙周受损的拔牙槽中,有膜固定的ARP在软组织轮廓变化方面不逊色于无膜固定的拔牙槽。试验注册:临床研究信息服务(CRIS), KCT0005280。2020年8月4日注册,邮箱:https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=19165&search_page=L。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Membrane Stabilization for Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Periodontally Compromised Extraction Sockets: A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the non-inferiority of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with membrane stabilization compared with non-stabilization, focusing on changes of soft-tissue contour in periodontally compromised extraction sockets. Secondary outcomes included changes in hard-tissue contour, patient-reported outcomes and new bone formation.

Materials and methods: Twenty-four patients with periodontally compromised teeth were randomly assigned to ARP with (test group) or without (control group) membrane stabilization. To assess profilometric and hard-tissue dimensional changes, dental impressions and cone beam computed tomography scans were performed at baseline (T0), immediately after ARP (T1) and 4 months post surgery (T2). Soft-tissue healing in open healing sites was evaluated at T2, and wound closure was assessed 10 days post surgery. Patient-reported outcomes were documented, and core biopsies were obtained for histomorphometric analysis.

Results: The absolute profilometric horizontal width change at 3 mm below the crest in the test group was not inferior to that in the control group. For the relative values, horizontal width reduction (3 and 5 mm below the crest) and volumetric shrinkage (3-5 mm below the crest) were lower in the test group. No significant differences were observed in bone dimensional changes, wound healing, pain and swelling or histomorphometric outcomes.

Conclusion: ARP with membrane stabilization in periodontally compromised extraction sockets is non-inferior in terms of soft-tissue contour changes to those without membrane fixation.

Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), KCT0005280. Registered 4 August 2020, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=19165&search_page=L.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Journal of Clinical Periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
10.40%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology. The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope. The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信