使用基于血液的蛋白质生物标志物分型中风:一种高通量蛋白质组学和机器学习方法。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shubham Misra, Praveen Singh, Shantanu Sengupta, Manoj Kushwaha, Zuhaibur Rahman, Divya Bhalla, Pumanshi Talwar, Manabesh Nath, Rahul Chakraborty, Pradeep Kumar, Amit Kumar, Praveen Aggarwal, Achal K Srivastava, Awadh K Pandit, Dheeraj Mohania, Kameshwar Prasad, Nishant K Mishra, Deepti Vibha
{"title":"使用基于血液的蛋白质生物标志物分型中风:一种高通量蛋白质组学和机器学习方法。","authors":"Shubham Misra, Praveen Singh, Shantanu Sengupta, Manoj Kushwaha, Zuhaibur Rahman, Divya Bhalla, Pumanshi Talwar, Manabesh Nath, Rahul Chakraborty, Pradeep Kumar, Amit Kumar, Praveen Aggarwal, Achal K Srivastava, Awadh K Pandit, Dheeraj Mohania, Kameshwar Prasad, Nishant K Mishra, Deepti Vibha","doi":"10.1111/eci.14372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid diagnosis of stroke and its subtypes is critical in early stages. We aimed to discover and validate blood-based protein biomarkers to differentiate ischemic stroke (IS) from intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) using high-throughput proteomics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected serum samples within 24 h from acute stroke (IS & ICH) and mimics patients. In the discovery phase, SWATH-MS proteomics identified differentially expressed proteins, which were validated using targeted proteomics in the validation phase. We conducted interaction network and pathway analyses using Cytoscape 3.10.0. We determined cut-off points using the Youden Index. We developed three prediction models using multivariable logistic regression analyses. We assessed the model performance using statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 20 IS and 20 ICH in the discovery phase and 150 IS, 150 ICH, and six stroke mimics in the validation phase. We quantified 375 proteins using SWATH-MS. Between IS and ICH, we discovered 20 differentially expressed proteins. In the validation phase, the combined prediction model including three biomarkers: GFAP (aOR 0.04; 95%CI .02-.11), MMP-9 (aOR .09; .03-.28), APO-C1 (aOR 5.76; 2.66-12.47) and clinical variables independently differentiated IS from ICH (accuracy: 92%, negative predictive value: 94%). Adding biomarkers to clinical variables improved discrimination by 26% (p < .001). Additionally, nine biomarkers differentiated IS from ICH within 6 h, while three biomarkers differentiated IS from mimics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that GFAP, MMP-9 and APO-C1 biomarkers independently differentiated IS from ICH within 24 h and significantly improved the discrimination ability of prediction models. Temporal profiling of these biomarkers in the acute phase of stroke is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"e14372"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subtyping strokes using blood-based protein biomarkers: A high-throughput proteomics and machine learning approach.\",\"authors\":\"Shubham Misra, Praveen Singh, Shantanu Sengupta, Manoj Kushwaha, Zuhaibur Rahman, Divya Bhalla, Pumanshi Talwar, Manabesh Nath, Rahul Chakraborty, Pradeep Kumar, Amit Kumar, Praveen Aggarwal, Achal K Srivastava, Awadh K Pandit, Dheeraj Mohania, Kameshwar Prasad, Nishant K Mishra, Deepti Vibha\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eci.14372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid diagnosis of stroke and its subtypes is critical in early stages. We aimed to discover and validate blood-based protein biomarkers to differentiate ischemic stroke (IS) from intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) using high-throughput proteomics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected serum samples within 24 h from acute stroke (IS & ICH) and mimics patients. In the discovery phase, SWATH-MS proteomics identified differentially expressed proteins, which were validated using targeted proteomics in the validation phase. We conducted interaction network and pathway analyses using Cytoscape 3.10.0. We determined cut-off points using the Youden Index. We developed three prediction models using multivariable logistic regression analyses. We assessed the model performance using statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 20 IS and 20 ICH in the discovery phase and 150 IS, 150 ICH, and six stroke mimics in the validation phase. We quantified 375 proteins using SWATH-MS. Between IS and ICH, we discovered 20 differentially expressed proteins. In the validation phase, the combined prediction model including three biomarkers: GFAP (aOR 0.04; 95%CI .02-.11), MMP-9 (aOR .09; .03-.28), APO-C1 (aOR 5.76; 2.66-12.47) and clinical variables independently differentiated IS from ICH (accuracy: 92%, negative predictive value: 94%). Adding biomarkers to clinical variables improved discrimination by 26% (p < .001). Additionally, nine biomarkers differentiated IS from ICH within 6 h, while three biomarkers differentiated IS from mimics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that GFAP, MMP-9 and APO-C1 biomarkers independently differentiated IS from ICH within 24 h and significantly improved the discrimination ability of prediction models. Temporal profiling of these biomarkers in the acute phase of stroke is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14372\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期快速诊断脑卒中及其亚型至关重要。我们旨在利用高通量蛋白质组学发现并验证基于血液的蛋白质生物标志物,以区分缺血性卒中(IS)和脑出血(ICH)。方法:采集急性脑卒中(IS和ICH)及模拟患者24 h内的血清样本。在发现阶段,SWATH-MS蛋白质组学鉴定了差异表达蛋白,并在验证阶段使用靶向蛋白质组学对其进行了验证。我们使用Cytoscape 3.10.0进行相互作用网络和途径分析。我们使用约登指数确定分界点。我们利用多变量逻辑回归分析建立了三个预测模型。我们使用统计检验来评估模型的性能。结果:我们在发现阶段纳入了20例IS和20例ICH,在验证阶段纳入了150例IS、150例ICH和6例卒中模拟。我们用SWATH-MS对375个蛋白进行定量。在IS和ICH之间,我们发现了20个差异表达蛋白。在验证阶段,联合预测模型包括三个生物标志物:GFAP (aOR 0.04;95%CI为0.02 - 0.11),MMP-9 (aOR为0.09;0.03 - 0.28), APO-C1 (aOR 5.76;2.66-12.47)和临床变量独立区分IS和ICH(准确率:92%,阴性预测值:94%)。结论:我们的研究表明GFAP、MMP-9和APO-C1生物标志物在24 h内独立区分IS和ICH,显著提高了预测模型的区分能力。这些生物标志物在中风急性期的时间谱分析是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subtyping strokes using blood-based protein biomarkers: A high-throughput proteomics and machine learning approach.

Background: Rapid diagnosis of stroke and its subtypes is critical in early stages. We aimed to discover and validate blood-based protein biomarkers to differentiate ischemic stroke (IS) from intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) using high-throughput proteomics.

Methods: We collected serum samples within 24 h from acute stroke (IS & ICH) and mimics patients. In the discovery phase, SWATH-MS proteomics identified differentially expressed proteins, which were validated using targeted proteomics in the validation phase. We conducted interaction network and pathway analyses using Cytoscape 3.10.0. We determined cut-off points using the Youden Index. We developed three prediction models using multivariable logistic regression analyses. We assessed the model performance using statistical tests.

Results: We included 20 IS and 20 ICH in the discovery phase and 150 IS, 150 ICH, and six stroke mimics in the validation phase. We quantified 375 proteins using SWATH-MS. Between IS and ICH, we discovered 20 differentially expressed proteins. In the validation phase, the combined prediction model including three biomarkers: GFAP (aOR 0.04; 95%CI .02-.11), MMP-9 (aOR .09; .03-.28), APO-C1 (aOR 5.76; 2.66-12.47) and clinical variables independently differentiated IS from ICH (accuracy: 92%, negative predictive value: 94%). Adding biomarkers to clinical variables improved discrimination by 26% (p < .001). Additionally, nine biomarkers differentiated IS from ICH within 6 h, while three biomarkers differentiated IS from mimics.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that GFAP, MMP-9 and APO-C1 biomarkers independently differentiated IS from ICH within 24 h and significantly improved the discrimination ability of prediction models. Temporal profiling of these biomarkers in the acute phase of stroke is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信