临床检查鉴别骶髂关节疼痛是否为慢性腰痛的诊断准确性。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vicente Vanaclocha, Pablo Jordá-Gómez, Nieves Saiz-Sapena, Leyre Vanaclocha, Jack Kennedy
{"title":"临床检查鉴别骶髂关节疼痛是否为慢性腰痛的诊断准确性。","authors":"Vicente Vanaclocha, Pablo Jordá-Gómez, Nieves Saiz-Sapena, Leyre Vanaclocha, Jack Kennedy","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2024.2433492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the availability of safe and effective surgical treatments for chronic SI joint pain, many clinicians find the diagnosis of SI joint pain challenging. Misdiagnosis can lead to misdirected surgery, which has important consequences. The study's goal was to determine whether a combination of clinical examination, joint block, and selected radiographic imaging can distinguish patients with SI joint pain from those with other causes of chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective diagnostic accuracy study with evaluation of 364 consecutive patients seeking advice in a neurosurgical clinic for chronic low back pain. Participating patients underwent comprehensive clinical examination (medical history items, specific physical examination manoeuvres, and selected radiographic tests) followed by SI joint block. Block was used to confirm or exclude SI joint pain. Logistic regression with LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) penalty was used to calculate the accuracy of diagnosis when looking at (1) medical history items only, (2) medical history plus radiographic testing, and (3) medical history, radiographic testing, and physical examination testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>150 patients had a positive response (>50% acute pain relief) to SI joint block, 214 had no response to SI joint block, and 37 had minimal (<50% improvement) in pain. Diagnostic accuracy for SI joint pain was lowest with medical history only (85-86%), slightly higher when radiographic testing was added (87%), and highest when physical examination testing was included (96%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comprehensive clinical examination (including SI joint block where relevant and selected imaging procedures) is accurate in distinguishing the SI joint from non-SI joint causes of chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04381208.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination to distinguish sacroiliac joint pain as a cause of chronic low back pain.\",\"authors\":\"Vicente Vanaclocha, Pablo Jordá-Gómez, Nieves Saiz-Sapena, Leyre Vanaclocha, Jack Kennedy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02688697.2024.2433492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the availability of safe and effective surgical treatments for chronic SI joint pain, many clinicians find the diagnosis of SI joint pain challenging. Misdiagnosis can lead to misdirected surgery, which has important consequences. The study's goal was to determine whether a combination of clinical examination, joint block, and selected radiographic imaging can distinguish patients with SI joint pain from those with other causes of chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective diagnostic accuracy study with evaluation of 364 consecutive patients seeking advice in a neurosurgical clinic for chronic low back pain. Participating patients underwent comprehensive clinical examination (medical history items, specific physical examination manoeuvres, and selected radiographic tests) followed by SI joint block. Block was used to confirm or exclude SI joint pain. Logistic regression with LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) penalty was used to calculate the accuracy of diagnosis when looking at (1) medical history items only, (2) medical history plus radiographic testing, and (3) medical history, radiographic testing, and physical examination testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>150 patients had a positive response (>50% acute pain relief) to SI joint block, 214 had no response to SI joint block, and 37 had minimal (<50% improvement) in pain. Diagnostic accuracy for SI joint pain was lowest with medical history only (85-86%), slightly higher when radiographic testing was added (87%), and highest when physical examination testing was included (96%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comprehensive clinical examination (including SI joint block where relevant and selected imaging procedures) is accurate in distinguishing the SI joint from non-SI joint causes of chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04381208.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2024.2433492\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2024.2433492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有安全有效的手术治疗慢性骶髂关节疼痛,许多临床医生发现骶髂关节疼痛的诊断具有挑战性。误诊会导致错误的手术,这有重要的后果。该研究的目的是确定临床检查、关节阻滞和选择的影像学检查是否可以将SI关节疼痛患者与其他原因的慢性腰痛患者区分开来。方法:对在神经外科门诊就诊的364例慢性腰痛患者进行前瞻性诊断准确性研究。参与的患者进行了全面的临床检查(病史项目,特定的体格检查操作和选定的x线检查),然后进行了SI关节阻滞。阻滞用于确认或排除骶髂关节疼痛。使用LASSO(最小绝对收缩和选择算子)惩罚的Logistic回归来计算(1)仅查看病史项目、(2)病史加x线检查、(3)病史、x线检查和体格检查时的诊断准确性。结果:150例患者对SI关节阻滞有积极反应(急性疼痛缓解50%),214例患者对SI关节阻滞无反应,37例患者有轻微反应(结论:全面的临床检查(包括相关的SI关节阻滞和选择的成像程序)可以准确区分SI关节和非SI关节引起的慢性腰痛。试验注册:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04381208。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination to distinguish sacroiliac joint pain as a cause of chronic low back pain.

Background: Despite the availability of safe and effective surgical treatments for chronic SI joint pain, many clinicians find the diagnosis of SI joint pain challenging. Misdiagnosis can lead to misdirected surgery, which has important consequences. The study's goal was to determine whether a combination of clinical examination, joint block, and selected radiographic imaging can distinguish patients with SI joint pain from those with other causes of chronic low back pain.

Methods: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study with evaluation of 364 consecutive patients seeking advice in a neurosurgical clinic for chronic low back pain. Participating patients underwent comprehensive clinical examination (medical history items, specific physical examination manoeuvres, and selected radiographic tests) followed by SI joint block. Block was used to confirm or exclude SI joint pain. Logistic regression with LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) penalty was used to calculate the accuracy of diagnosis when looking at (1) medical history items only, (2) medical history plus radiographic testing, and (3) medical history, radiographic testing, and physical examination testing.

Results: 150 patients had a positive response (>50% acute pain relief) to SI joint block, 214 had no response to SI joint block, and 37 had minimal (<50% improvement) in pain. Diagnostic accuracy for SI joint pain was lowest with medical history only (85-86%), slightly higher when radiographic testing was added (87%), and highest when physical examination testing was included (96%).

Conclusion: Comprehensive clinical examination (including SI joint block where relevant and selected imaging procedures) is accurate in distinguishing the SI joint from non-SI joint causes of chronic low back pain.

Trial registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04381208.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Neurosurgery
British Journal of Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide. Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信