{"title":"COVID-19是否影响QT间期延长?答案来自基因因果推理。","authors":"Yongfei Song, Zequn Zheng","doi":"10.1042/BSR20241281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been heightened interest in the QT interval, a crucial indicator of ventricular electrical activity. Mendelian randomization (MR) is used here to investigate the genetic causation between QT interval alterations and COVID-19. Genetic proxies representing three COVID-19 phenotypes-severe, hospitalized, and COVID-19-were identified in over 1,000,000 individuals of European ancestry. Univariate two-sample MR (TSMR) and multi-exposure-adjusted multivariate MR (MVMR) were used to assess genetic causal associations between COVID-19 and QT intervals in 84,630 UK Biobank participants. The MR-robust adjusted profile score (MR-RAPS) method and radial MR frame were utilized for effective robustness and outlier variant detection, with sensitivity analyses conducted to identify horizontal pleiotropy. For every COVID-19 phenotype, univariate TSMR analysis revealed non-significant causal estimates between COVID-19 and the QT interval [COVID-19: βIVW (95% CI): -0.44 (-1.72, 0.84), P = 0.50; hospitalization: βIVW: 0.12 (-0.57, 0.80), P = 0.74; severe case: βIVW: 0.11 (-0.29, 0.51), P = 0.58]. MR-RAPS and outlier-corrected radial MR analyses further supported this null causal estimation. In confounder-adjusted MVMR analysis, this nonsignificant causality was independent of body mass index (BMI), smoking, and alcohol consumption [βBMI+Alcohol+Smoking (95% CI): -0.77 (-2.44, 0.91), P = 0.37]. Sensitivity analyses did not detect any evidence of bias from horizontal pleiotropy, abnormal data distribution, or weak instruments. These findings suggest that COVID-19 does not directly causally prolong the QT interval. Inconsistent findings in observational research may be attributed to residual confounding.</p>","PeriodicalId":8926,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does COVID-19 impact the QT interval prolongation? Answers from genetic causal inference.\",\"authors\":\"Yongfei Song, Zequn Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1042/BSR20241281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been heightened interest in the QT interval, a crucial indicator of ventricular electrical activity. Mendelian randomization (MR) is used here to investigate the genetic causation between QT interval alterations and COVID-19. Genetic proxies representing three COVID-19 phenotypes-severe, hospitalized, and COVID-19-were identified in over 1,000,000 individuals of European ancestry. Univariate two-sample MR (TSMR) and multi-exposure-adjusted multivariate MR (MVMR) were used to assess genetic causal associations between COVID-19 and QT intervals in 84,630 UK Biobank participants. The MR-robust adjusted profile score (MR-RAPS) method and radial MR frame were utilized for effective robustness and outlier variant detection, with sensitivity analyses conducted to identify horizontal pleiotropy. For every COVID-19 phenotype, univariate TSMR analysis revealed non-significant causal estimates between COVID-19 and the QT interval [COVID-19: βIVW (95% CI): -0.44 (-1.72, 0.84), P = 0.50; hospitalization: βIVW: 0.12 (-0.57, 0.80), P = 0.74; severe case: βIVW: 0.11 (-0.29, 0.51), P = 0.58]. MR-RAPS and outlier-corrected radial MR analyses further supported this null causal estimation. In confounder-adjusted MVMR analysis, this nonsignificant causality was independent of body mass index (BMI), smoking, and alcohol consumption [βBMI+Alcohol+Smoking (95% CI): -0.77 (-2.44, 0.91), P = 0.37]. Sensitivity analyses did not detect any evidence of bias from horizontal pleiotropy, abnormal data distribution, or weak instruments. These findings suggest that COVID-19 does not directly causally prolong the QT interval. Inconsistent findings in observational research may be attributed to residual confounding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioscience Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioscience Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20241281\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience Reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20241281","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在COVID-19大流行期间,QT间期(心室电活动的关键指标)引起了人们的高度关注。孟德尔随机化(MR)用于研究QT间期改变与COVID-19之间的遗传因果关系。在100多万欧洲血统的个体中确定了代表三种COVID-19表型(重症、住院和COVID-19)的遗传代用物。使用单变量双样本孟德尔随机化(TSMR)和多暴露调整多变量孟德尔随机化(MVMR)评估84,630名英国生物银行参与者中COVID-19与QT间期之间的遗传因果关系。利用磁共振鲁棒性调整轮廓评分(MR- raps)方法和径向磁共振框架进行效果鲁棒性和异常变异检测,并进行敏感性分析以识别水平多效性。对于每种COVID-19表型,单变量TSMR分析显示COVID-19与QT间期之间的非显著因果估计[COVID-19: βIVW (95% CI): -0.44 (-1.72, 0.84), P = 0.50;住院率:βIVW: 0.12 (-0.57, 0.80), P = 0.74;严重的案例:βIVW: 0.11 (-0.29, 0.51), P = 0.58)。MR- raps和异常值校正的径向MR分析进一步支持了这一零因果估计。在混杂因素调整后的MVMR分析中,这种不显著的因果关系与BMI、吸烟和饮酒无关[βBMI+酒精+吸烟(95% CI): -0.77 (-2.44, 0.91), P = 0.37]。敏感性分析未发现水平多效性、异常数据分布或弱仪器的偏倚证据。这些发现表明COVID-19不会直接导致QT间期延长。观察性研究中不一致的发现可能归因于残留混淆。
Does COVID-19 impact the QT interval prolongation? Answers from genetic causal inference.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been heightened interest in the QT interval, a crucial indicator of ventricular electrical activity. Mendelian randomization (MR) is used here to investigate the genetic causation between QT interval alterations and COVID-19. Genetic proxies representing three COVID-19 phenotypes-severe, hospitalized, and COVID-19-were identified in over 1,000,000 individuals of European ancestry. Univariate two-sample MR (TSMR) and multi-exposure-adjusted multivariate MR (MVMR) were used to assess genetic causal associations between COVID-19 and QT intervals in 84,630 UK Biobank participants. The MR-robust adjusted profile score (MR-RAPS) method and radial MR frame were utilized for effective robustness and outlier variant detection, with sensitivity analyses conducted to identify horizontal pleiotropy. For every COVID-19 phenotype, univariate TSMR analysis revealed non-significant causal estimates between COVID-19 and the QT interval [COVID-19: βIVW (95% CI): -0.44 (-1.72, 0.84), P = 0.50; hospitalization: βIVW: 0.12 (-0.57, 0.80), P = 0.74; severe case: βIVW: 0.11 (-0.29, 0.51), P = 0.58]. MR-RAPS and outlier-corrected radial MR analyses further supported this null causal estimation. In confounder-adjusted MVMR analysis, this nonsignificant causality was independent of body mass index (BMI), smoking, and alcohol consumption [βBMI+Alcohol+Smoking (95% CI): -0.77 (-2.44, 0.91), P = 0.37]. Sensitivity analyses did not detect any evidence of bias from horizontal pleiotropy, abnormal data distribution, or weak instruments. These findings suggest that COVID-19 does not directly causally prolong the QT interval. Inconsistent findings in observational research may be attributed to residual confounding.
期刊介绍:
Bioscience Reports provides a home for sound scientific research in all areas of cell biology and molecular life sciences.
Since 2012, Bioscience Reports has been fully Open Access and publishes all papers under the liberal CC BY licence, giving the life science community quality research to share and discuss.Content before 2012 is subscription-only, and is accessible via archive purchase.
Articles are assessed on soundness, providing a home for valid findings and data.
We welcome papers that span disciplines (e.g. chemistry, medicine), including papers describing:
-new methodologies
-tools and reagents to probe biological questions
-mechanistic details
-disease mechanisms
-metabolic processes and their regulation
-structure and function
-bioenergetics