类风湿关节炎患者发生心力衰竭和心力衰竭亚型的风险

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Yumeko Kawano, Brittany N Weber, Dana Weisenfeld, Mary I Jeffway, Tianrun Cai, Gregory C McDermott, Qing Liu, Jeffrey A Sparks, Jennifer Stuart, Jacob Joseph, Tianxi Cai, Katherine P Liao
{"title":"类风湿关节炎患者发生心力衰竭和心力衰竭亚型的风险","authors":"Yumeko Kawano, Brittany N Weber, Dana Weisenfeld, Mary I Jeffway, Tianrun Cai, Gregory C McDermott, Qing Liu, Jeffrey A Sparks, Jennifer Stuart, Jacob Joseph, Tianxi Cai, Katherine P Liao","doi":"10.1002/acr.25481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) including heart failure (HF). However, little is known regarding the relative risks of HF subtypes such as HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in RA compared with non-RA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients with RA and matched non-RA comparators among participants consenting to broad research from two large academic centers. We identified incident HF and categorized HF subtypes based on EF closest to the HF incident date. Covariates included age, sex, and established CVD risk factors. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) for incident HF and HF subtypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 1,445 patients with RA and 4,335 matched non-RA comparators (mean age 51.4 and 51.7 years, respectively; 78.7% female). HFpEF was the most common HF subtype in both groups (65% in RA vs 59% in non-RA). Patients with RA had an HR of 1.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-2.32) for incident HF compared with those without RA after adjusting for CVD risk factors. Patients with RA had a higher rate of HFpEF (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.43-2.77), but there was no statistical difference in the HFrEF rate (HR 1.45, 95% CI 0.81-2.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RA was associated with a higher rate of HF overall compared with non-RA, even after adjustment for established CVD risk factors. The elevated risk was driven by HFpEF, supporting a role for inflammation in HFpEF and highlighting potential opportunities to address this excess risk in RA.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of Incident Heart Failure and Heart Failure Subtypes in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Yumeko Kawano, Brittany N Weber, Dana Weisenfeld, Mary I Jeffway, Tianrun Cai, Gregory C McDermott, Qing Liu, Jeffrey A Sparks, Jennifer Stuart, Jacob Joseph, Tianxi Cai, Katherine P Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr.25481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) including heart failure (HF). However, little is known regarding the relative risks of HF subtypes such as HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in RA compared with non-RA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients with RA and matched non-RA comparators among participants consenting to broad research from two large academic centers. We identified incident HF and categorized HF subtypes based on EF closest to the HF incident date. Covariates included age, sex, and established CVD risk factors. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) for incident HF and HF subtypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 1,445 patients with RA and 4,335 matched non-RA comparators (mean age 51.4 and 51.7 years, respectively; 78.7% female). HFpEF was the most common HF subtype in both groups (65% in RA vs 59% in non-RA). Patients with RA had an HR of 1.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-2.32) for incident HF compared with those without RA after adjusting for CVD risk factors. Patients with RA had a higher rate of HFpEF (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.43-2.77), but there was no statistical difference in the HFrEF rate (HR 1.45, 95% CI 0.81-2.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RA was associated with a higher rate of HF overall compared with non-RA, even after adjustment for established CVD risk factors. The elevated risk was driven by HFpEF, supporting a role for inflammation in HFpEF and highlighting potential opportunities to address this excess risk in RA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25481\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25481","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:类风湿关节炎(RA)患者发生心血管疾病(CVD)的风险增加,包括心力衰竭(HF)。然而,与非RA相比,对于心力衰竭亚型(如HF伴保留(HFpEF)或降低射血分数(HFrEF))在RA中的相对风险知之甚少。方法:我们从两个大型学术中心的同意广泛研究的参与者中确定RA患者和匹配非RA比较者。我们根据最接近HF发生日期的射血分数(EF)确定了事件HF并对HF亚型进行了分类。协变量包括年龄、性别和已确定的心血管疾病危险因素。使用Cox比例风险模型估计突发HF和HF亚型的风险比(HR)。结果:我们研究了1445例RA患者和4335例匹配的非RA比较者(平均年龄51.4岁和51.7岁,78.7%为女性)。HFpEF是两组中最常见的HF亚型(RA为65%,非RA为59%)。调整心血管疾病危险因素后,RA患者与无RA患者相比,发生HF的HR为1.79 (95% CI: 1.38-2.32)。RA患者HFpEF发生率较高(HR 1.99, 95% CI: 1.43 - 2.77),但HFrEF发生率无统计学差异(HR 1.45, 95% CI 0.81 - 2.60)。结论:与非RA相比,RA总体上与更高的HF发生率相关,即使在调整了既定的CVD危险因素后也是如此。HFpEF导致风险升高,支持HFpEF中炎症的作用,并强调了解决RA中这种过度风险的潜在机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk of Incident Heart Failure and Heart Failure Subtypes in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Objective: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) including heart failure (HF). However, little is known regarding the relative risks of HF subtypes such as HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in RA compared with non-RA.

Methods: We identified patients with RA and matched non-RA comparators among participants consenting to broad research from two large academic centers. We identified incident HF and categorized HF subtypes based on EF closest to the HF incident date. Covariates included age, sex, and established CVD risk factors. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) for incident HF and HF subtypes.

Results: We studied 1,445 patients with RA and 4,335 matched non-RA comparators (mean age 51.4 and 51.7 years, respectively; 78.7% female). HFpEF was the most common HF subtype in both groups (65% in RA vs 59% in non-RA). Patients with RA had an HR of 1.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-2.32) for incident HF compared with those without RA after adjusting for CVD risk factors. Patients with RA had a higher rate of HFpEF (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.43-2.77), but there was no statistical difference in the HFrEF rate (HR 1.45, 95% CI 0.81-2.60).

Conclusion: RA was associated with a higher rate of HF overall compared with non-RA, even after adjustment for established CVD risk factors. The elevated risk was driven by HFpEF, supporting a role for inflammation in HFpEF and highlighting potential opportunities to address this excess risk in RA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信