土壤微塑料的提取效率取决于样品的培养时间和使用的有机物去除剂

IF 3.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Radosław Stec, Krzysztof Sitko, Marta Pogrzeba, Szymon Rusinowski, Paulina Janota, Izabela Ratman-Kłosińska, Jacek Krzyżak
{"title":"土壤微塑料的提取效率取决于样品的培养时间和使用的有机物去除剂","authors":"Radosław Stec,&nbsp;Krzysztof Sitko,&nbsp;Marta Pogrzeba,&nbsp;Szymon Rusinowski,&nbsp;Paulina Janota,&nbsp;Izabela Ratman-Kłosińska,&nbsp;Jacek Krzyżak","doi":"10.1007/s11270-024-07685-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Environmental pollution by microplastics is now a global problem, as global plastic production is increasing and at the same time recycling of plastic waste is low. In recent years, a number of methods have been developed to determine the content of microplastics in soil. This study compares the efficiency of microplastic extraction in two-week and three-month incubation samples from three different soils artificially contaminated with different types of microplastics. H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and KOH were used as agents to remove organic matter. The effects of changing the incubation time were significant in soils with a high organic matter content. A longer incubation time resulted in a lower efficiency of microplastic extraction. Compared to the results obtained with the control method after a two-week incubation, the loose sand samples achieved a similar extraction efficiency (86%), the amount of MP recovered in the uncontaminated sandy clay samples was 75%, while the sandy clay soils contaminated with heavy metals was 44%. The samples without organic matter removal showed a significantly better recovery rate of microplastics than the samples treated with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and KOH.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"236 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil Microplastic Extraction Efficiency Depends on the Sample Incubation Time and the Organic Matter Removal Agent Used\",\"authors\":\"Radosław Stec,&nbsp;Krzysztof Sitko,&nbsp;Marta Pogrzeba,&nbsp;Szymon Rusinowski,&nbsp;Paulina Janota,&nbsp;Izabela Ratman-Kłosińska,&nbsp;Jacek Krzyżak\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11270-024-07685-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Environmental pollution by microplastics is now a global problem, as global plastic production is increasing and at the same time recycling of plastic waste is low. In recent years, a number of methods have been developed to determine the content of microplastics in soil. This study compares the efficiency of microplastic extraction in two-week and three-month incubation samples from three different soils artificially contaminated with different types of microplastics. H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and KOH were used as agents to remove organic matter. The effects of changing the incubation time were significant in soils with a high organic matter content. A longer incubation time resulted in a lower efficiency of microplastic extraction. Compared to the results obtained with the control method after a two-week incubation, the loose sand samples achieved a similar extraction efficiency (86%), the amount of MP recovered in the uncontaminated sandy clay samples was 75%, while the sandy clay soils contaminated with heavy metals was 44%. The samples without organic matter removal showed a significantly better recovery rate of microplastics than the samples treated with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and KOH.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"volume\":\"236 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-024-07685-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-024-07685-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于全球塑料产量不断增加,而塑料废物的回收率却很低,微塑料对环境的污染已成为一个全球性问题。近年来,人们发展了许多测定土壤中微塑料含量的方法。本研究比较了三种不同土壤中被不同类型微塑料人工污染两周和三个月的微塑料提取效率。用H2O2和KOH作为脱除有机物的药剂。在有机质含量较高的土壤中,改变培养时间的效果显著。培养时间越长,微塑料提取效率越低。经过两周的培养,松散砂土样品的提取效率与对照方法相当(86%),未污染砂质粘土样品的MP回收率为75%,而重金属污染砂质粘土样品的MP回收率为44%。未去除有机物的样品的微塑料回收率明显高于经过H2O2和KOH处理的样品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Soil Microplastic Extraction Efficiency Depends on the Sample Incubation Time and the Organic Matter Removal Agent Used

Soil Microplastic Extraction Efficiency Depends on the Sample Incubation Time and the Organic Matter Removal Agent Used

Environmental pollution by microplastics is now a global problem, as global plastic production is increasing and at the same time recycling of plastic waste is low. In recent years, a number of methods have been developed to determine the content of microplastics in soil. This study compares the efficiency of microplastic extraction in two-week and three-month incubation samples from three different soils artificially contaminated with different types of microplastics. H2O2 and KOH were used as agents to remove organic matter. The effects of changing the incubation time were significant in soils with a high organic matter content. A longer incubation time resulted in a lower efficiency of microplastic extraction. Compared to the results obtained with the control method after a two-week incubation, the loose sand samples achieved a similar extraction efficiency (86%), the amount of MP recovered in the uncontaminated sandy clay samples was 75%, while the sandy clay soils contaminated with heavy metals was 44%. The samples without organic matter removal showed a significantly better recovery rate of microplastics than the samples treated with H2O2 and KOH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments. Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信