使用不同电极和高压电源的电晕放电测量仪器的灵敏度分析

IF 2.2 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Pradeep Kumar Gupta;Jordi-Roger Riba Ruiz;Pau Casals-Torrens;Jordi Talens i Garvín;Kaur Tuttelberg;Jako Kilter
{"title":"使用不同电极和高压电源的电晕放电测量仪器的灵敏度分析","authors":"Pradeep Kumar Gupta;Jordi-Roger Riba Ruiz;Pau Casals-Torrens;Jordi Talens i Garvín;Kaur Tuttelberg;Jako Kilter","doi":"10.1109/LSENS.2024.3504551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corona discharge testing is critical to ensuring the safety, performance and reliability of high-voltage (HV) equipment and systems. Due to the high cost of shielded laboratories, many manufacturers test their components in unshielded laboratories for applications, such as product research and development or quality control. This letter compares the sensitivity of two corona detection instruments in an unshielded laboratory. The sensitivity of an electrical detector according to IEC 60270 in combination with a measuring impedance and a coupling capacitor is compared with that of a digital single lens reflex (DSLR) camera. In addition, needle-to-plane and sphere-to-plane electrode geometries are studied under different types of high-voltage power supplies, i.e., 50 Hz ac, positive dc, and negative dc. Experimental results performed in an unshielded high-voltage laboratory show that although the DSLR camera is not a standard method for partial discharge (PD) detection, it has similar sensitivity to the conventional electrical method according to IEC 60270 in all cases analyzed, and that the digital camera behaves much better in pulseless glow corona mode.","PeriodicalId":13014,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Sensors Letters","volume":"8 12","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity Analysis of Corona Discharges Measuring Instruments Using Different Electrodes and High Voltage Supplies\",\"authors\":\"Pradeep Kumar Gupta;Jordi-Roger Riba Ruiz;Pau Casals-Torrens;Jordi Talens i Garvín;Kaur Tuttelberg;Jako Kilter\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LSENS.2024.3504551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Corona discharge testing is critical to ensuring the safety, performance and reliability of high-voltage (HV) equipment and systems. Due to the high cost of shielded laboratories, many manufacturers test their components in unshielded laboratories for applications, such as product research and development or quality control. This letter compares the sensitivity of two corona detection instruments in an unshielded laboratory. The sensitivity of an electrical detector according to IEC 60270 in combination with a measuring impedance and a coupling capacitor is compared with that of a digital single lens reflex (DSLR) camera. In addition, needle-to-plane and sphere-to-plane electrode geometries are studied under different types of high-voltage power supplies, i.e., 50 Hz ac, positive dc, and negative dc. Experimental results performed in an unshielded high-voltage laboratory show that although the DSLR camera is not a standard method for partial discharge (PD) detection, it has similar sensitivity to the conventional electrical method according to IEC 60270 in all cases analyzed, and that the digital camera behaves much better in pulseless glow corona mode.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Sensors Letters\",\"volume\":\"8 12\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Sensors Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10767190/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Sensors Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10767190/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电晕放电测试对于确保高压(HV)设备和系统的安全性、性能和可靠性至关重要。由于屏蔽实验室的高成本,许多制造商在非屏蔽实验室中测试其组件,用于产品研发或质量控制等应用。这封信比较了两种电晕检测仪器在无屏蔽实验室的灵敏度。结合测量阻抗和耦合电容,对符合IEC 60270标准的电检测器的灵敏度与数码单镜头反光相机的灵敏度进行了比较。此外,在不同类型的高压电源,即50 Hz交流、正直流和负直流下,研究了针对平面和球对平面的电极几何形状。在无屏蔽的高压实验室中进行的实验结果表明,虽然单反相机不是局部放电(PD)检测的标准方法,但在所有分析的情况下,它的灵敏度与IEC 60270标准的传统电方法相似,并且数码相机在无脉冲辉光电晕模式下的表现要好得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensitivity Analysis of Corona Discharges Measuring Instruments Using Different Electrodes and High Voltage Supplies
Corona discharge testing is critical to ensuring the safety, performance and reliability of high-voltage (HV) equipment and systems. Due to the high cost of shielded laboratories, many manufacturers test their components in unshielded laboratories for applications, such as product research and development or quality control. This letter compares the sensitivity of two corona detection instruments in an unshielded laboratory. The sensitivity of an electrical detector according to IEC 60270 in combination with a measuring impedance and a coupling capacitor is compared with that of a digital single lens reflex (DSLR) camera. In addition, needle-to-plane and sphere-to-plane electrode geometries are studied under different types of high-voltage power supplies, i.e., 50 Hz ac, positive dc, and negative dc. Experimental results performed in an unshielded high-voltage laboratory show that although the DSLR camera is not a standard method for partial discharge (PD) detection, it has similar sensitivity to the conventional electrical method according to IEC 60270 in all cases analyzed, and that the digital camera behaves much better in pulseless glow corona mode.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Sensors Letters
IEEE Sensors Letters Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
194
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信