Ayhan Dinckan , Eryigit Eren , Fatih Ensaroglu , Taylan Sahin , Hakan Parlak , Ali Kocyigit , Utku Alkara , Murat Akyildiz , Mehmet Tokac
{"title":"配对交换活体肝移植:来自土耳其的单中心经验。","authors":"Ayhan Dinckan , Eryigit Eren , Fatih Ensaroglu , Taylan Sahin , Hakan Parlak , Ali Kocyigit , Utku Alkara , Murat Akyildiz , Mehmet Tokac","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In countries with low rates of deceased donor solid organ transplantations, live-donor liver transplantation is the preferred definitive treatment for children and adults with end-stage liver disease. However, it is known that a remarkable number of potential living liver donors are rejected due to ABO incompatibility, suboptimal liver mass, or anatomical features. Paired exchange liver transplantation (PELT) practice emerged to overcome these obstacles. Herein, we present the results of our single-center experience with PELT and compare them with previously reported data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent PELT between January 2015 and December 2022 constituted the target population. The collected recipient data included demographic parameters, the model for end-stage liver disease score, graft-recipient weight ratio, indication for LT and paired exchange, body-mass index, duration of hospital stay, duration of intensive care unit stay, postoperative complications and inpatient mortality. Donor data, including demographic characteristics, body mass index, type of liver graft (right lobe or left lateral segment), graft weight (g), type of portal vein anatomy (Type 1, 2, or 3), type of biliary anatomy (Type 1, 2, 3a, 3b), duration of hospital stay, complications and mortality were retrieved.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 18 recipients, 14 (78%) were male, and 4 (22%) were female. The mean recipient age was 50.7 [2-66], while the mean donor age was 29.3 [18-40]. The mean follow-up period was 31.9 [12-71] months. The 1-year patient and graft survivals were calculated as 83.3% and 88.9%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The PELT can be utterly feasible at transplant centers with remarkable LDLT experience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"57 2","pages":"Pages 272-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paired Exchange Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single Center Experience From Turkiye\",\"authors\":\"Ayhan Dinckan , Eryigit Eren , Fatih Ensaroglu , Taylan Sahin , Hakan Parlak , Ali Kocyigit , Utku Alkara , Murat Akyildiz , Mehmet Tokac\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In countries with low rates of deceased donor solid organ transplantations, live-donor liver transplantation is the preferred definitive treatment for children and adults with end-stage liver disease. However, it is known that a remarkable number of potential living liver donors are rejected due to ABO incompatibility, suboptimal liver mass, or anatomical features. Paired exchange liver transplantation (PELT) practice emerged to overcome these obstacles. Herein, we present the results of our single-center experience with PELT and compare them with previously reported data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent PELT between January 2015 and December 2022 constituted the target population. The collected recipient data included demographic parameters, the model for end-stage liver disease score, graft-recipient weight ratio, indication for LT and paired exchange, body-mass index, duration of hospital stay, duration of intensive care unit stay, postoperative complications and inpatient mortality. Donor data, including demographic characteristics, body mass index, type of liver graft (right lobe or left lateral segment), graft weight (g), type of portal vein anatomy (Type 1, 2, or 3), type of biliary anatomy (Type 1, 2, 3a, 3b), duration of hospital stay, complications and mortality were retrieved.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 18 recipients, 14 (78%) were male, and 4 (22%) were female. The mean recipient age was 50.7 [2-66], while the mean donor age was 29.3 [18-40]. The mean follow-up period was 31.9 [12-71] months. The 1-year patient and graft survivals were calculated as 83.3% and 88.9%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The PELT can be utterly feasible at transplant centers with remarkable LDLT experience.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\"57 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 272-276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524005438\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524005438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Paired Exchange Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single Center Experience From Turkiye
Background
In countries with low rates of deceased donor solid organ transplantations, live-donor liver transplantation is the preferred definitive treatment for children and adults with end-stage liver disease. However, it is known that a remarkable number of potential living liver donors are rejected due to ABO incompatibility, suboptimal liver mass, or anatomical features. Paired exchange liver transplantation (PELT) practice emerged to overcome these obstacles. Herein, we present the results of our single-center experience with PELT and compare them with previously reported data.
Methods
Patients who underwent PELT between January 2015 and December 2022 constituted the target population. The collected recipient data included demographic parameters, the model for end-stage liver disease score, graft-recipient weight ratio, indication for LT and paired exchange, body-mass index, duration of hospital stay, duration of intensive care unit stay, postoperative complications and inpatient mortality. Donor data, including demographic characteristics, body mass index, type of liver graft (right lobe or left lateral segment), graft weight (g), type of portal vein anatomy (Type 1, 2, or 3), type of biliary anatomy (Type 1, 2, 3a, 3b), duration of hospital stay, complications and mortality were retrieved.
Results
Among 18 recipients, 14 (78%) were male, and 4 (22%) were female. The mean recipient age was 50.7 [2-66], while the mean donor age was 29.3 [18-40]. The mean follow-up period was 31.9 [12-71] months. The 1-year patient and graft survivals were calculated as 83.3% and 88.9%.
Conclusion
The PELT can be utterly feasible at transplant centers with remarkable LDLT experience.
期刊介绍:
Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication.
The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics.
Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board.
Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.