联合激素避孕药使用者缺血性卒中:丹麦注册研究。

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stroke Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049252
Gasper Letnar, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Tom Skyhøj Olsen
{"title":"联合激素避孕药使用者缺血性卒中:丹麦注册研究。","authors":"Gasper Letnar, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Tom Skyhøj Olsen","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) with ethinylestradiol and progestins is the most widely used contraceptive method among young women and is used by millions worldwide. However, uncertainties exist about the risk of ischemic stroke associated with the use of CHCs with low-dose ethinylestradiol (<50-µg ethinylestradiol) and with the newest fourth-generation progestins that have only been sparsely investigated for the risk of ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cohort study based on Danish registries covering the entire Danish female population aged 18 to 49 years from 2004 to 2021, we investigated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of ischemic stroke using CHCs compared with nonuse of hormonal contraceptives. Analyses focused on comparing CHCs based on ethinylestradiol content (30-40- versus ≤20-μg ethinylestradiol), progestin generation (second, third, and fourth) in CHCs, and route of administration (monophasic versus sequential). Poisson regression models adjusting for age, education, ethnicity, calendar year, and medication used for risk factors were utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1 711 757 nonpregnant women contributed 14 697 788 person-years to the investigation. For users of CHCs containing <50-µg ethinylestradiol, the adjusted IRR was increased by 1.77 (95% CI, 1.62-1.93) compared with nonusers of hormonal contraceptives. IRR did not differ between CHCs with 30- to 40- and ≤20-µg ethinylestradiol. Adjusted incidence rate difference between CHC users and nonusers of hormonal contraceptives ranged from 1 in 100 000 women per year in 18 to 24 years of age to 24 in 100 000 women per year in ≥45 years of age. Incidence rate in users of fourth-generation CHCs was 30% lower than that of second-generation CHCs adjusted IRR (0.70 [95% CI, 0.50-0.98]). IRR for users of third-generation CHCs did not differ significantly from that of second-generation users adjusted IRR (1.14 [95% CI, 0.97-1.35]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of CHCs was associated with a 1.77 higher IRR of ischemic stroke. IRR did not relate to ethinylestradiol content in users of CHCs with <50-µg ethinylestradiol. IRR was 30% lower in users of fourth-generation than in users of second-generation CHCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"276-284"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ischemic Stroke in Users of Combined Hormonal Contraceptives: A Danish Registry Study.\",\"authors\":\"Gasper Letnar, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Tom Skyhøj Olsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) with ethinylestradiol and progestins is the most widely used contraceptive method among young women and is used by millions worldwide. However, uncertainties exist about the risk of ischemic stroke associated with the use of CHCs with low-dose ethinylestradiol (<50-µg ethinylestradiol) and with the newest fourth-generation progestins that have only been sparsely investigated for the risk of ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cohort study based on Danish registries covering the entire Danish female population aged 18 to 49 years from 2004 to 2021, we investigated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of ischemic stroke using CHCs compared with nonuse of hormonal contraceptives. Analyses focused on comparing CHCs based on ethinylestradiol content (30-40- versus ≤20-μg ethinylestradiol), progestin generation (second, third, and fourth) in CHCs, and route of administration (monophasic versus sequential). Poisson regression models adjusting for age, education, ethnicity, calendar year, and medication used for risk factors were utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1 711 757 nonpregnant women contributed 14 697 788 person-years to the investigation. For users of CHCs containing <50-µg ethinylestradiol, the adjusted IRR was increased by 1.77 (95% CI, 1.62-1.93) compared with nonusers of hormonal contraceptives. IRR did not differ between CHCs with 30- to 40- and ≤20-µg ethinylestradiol. Adjusted incidence rate difference between CHC users and nonusers of hormonal contraceptives ranged from 1 in 100 000 women per year in 18 to 24 years of age to 24 in 100 000 women per year in ≥45 years of age. Incidence rate in users of fourth-generation CHCs was 30% lower than that of second-generation CHCs adjusted IRR (0.70 [95% CI, 0.50-0.98]). IRR for users of third-generation CHCs did not differ significantly from that of second-generation users adjusted IRR (1.14 [95% CI, 0.97-1.35]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of CHCs was associated with a 1.77 higher IRR of ischemic stroke. IRR did not relate to ethinylestradiol content in users of CHCs with <50-µg ethinylestradiol. IRR was 30% lower in users of fourth-generation than in users of second-generation CHCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"276-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049252\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049252","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:炔雌醇和孕激素联合激素避孕(CHC)是年轻女性中使用最广泛的避孕方法,全世界有数百万人使用。然而,与使用低剂量炔雌醇的CHCs相关的缺血性卒中风险存在不确定性(方法:在这项基于丹麦登记的队列研究中,涵盖了2004年至2021年年龄在18至49岁之间的整个丹麦女性人口,我们调查了使用CHCs与不使用激素避孕药的缺血性卒中发病率比(IRRs)。分析的重点是比较炔雌醇含量(30-40 μg与≤20 μg炔雌醇)、孕激素代(第二代、第三代和第四代)以及给药途径(单相与序贯)。使用泊松回归模型调整年龄、教育程度、种族、日历年和用于危险因素的药物。结果:共有1 711 757名非孕妇参与调查,共14 697 788人年。结论:使用CHCs与缺血性卒中的IRR升高1.77相关。在CHCs使用者中,IRR与乙炔雌醇含量无关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ischemic Stroke in Users of Combined Hormonal Contraceptives: A Danish Registry Study.

Background: The combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) with ethinylestradiol and progestins is the most widely used contraceptive method among young women and is used by millions worldwide. However, uncertainties exist about the risk of ischemic stroke associated with the use of CHCs with low-dose ethinylestradiol (<50-µg ethinylestradiol) and with the newest fourth-generation progestins that have only been sparsely investigated for the risk of ischemic stroke.

Methods: In this cohort study based on Danish registries covering the entire Danish female population aged 18 to 49 years from 2004 to 2021, we investigated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of ischemic stroke using CHCs compared with nonuse of hormonal contraceptives. Analyses focused on comparing CHCs based on ethinylestradiol content (30-40- versus ≤20-μg ethinylestradiol), progestin generation (second, third, and fourth) in CHCs, and route of administration (monophasic versus sequential). Poisson regression models adjusting for age, education, ethnicity, calendar year, and medication used for risk factors were utilized.

Results: In total, 1 711 757 nonpregnant women contributed 14 697 788 person-years to the investigation. For users of CHCs containing <50-µg ethinylestradiol, the adjusted IRR was increased by 1.77 (95% CI, 1.62-1.93) compared with nonusers of hormonal contraceptives. IRR did not differ between CHCs with 30- to 40- and ≤20-µg ethinylestradiol. Adjusted incidence rate difference between CHC users and nonusers of hormonal contraceptives ranged from 1 in 100 000 women per year in 18 to 24 years of age to 24 in 100 000 women per year in ≥45 years of age. Incidence rate in users of fourth-generation CHCs was 30% lower than that of second-generation CHCs adjusted IRR (0.70 [95% CI, 0.50-0.98]). IRR for users of third-generation CHCs did not differ significantly from that of second-generation users adjusted IRR (1.14 [95% CI, 0.97-1.35]).

Conclusions: Use of CHCs was associated with a 1.77 higher IRR of ischemic stroke. IRR did not relate to ethinylestradiol content in users of CHCs with <50-µg ethinylestradiol. IRR was 30% lower in users of fourth-generation than in users of second-generation CHCs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信