脑震荡后驾驶:症状群和神经认知与脑震荡后驾驶表现的独特关系。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Kumiko Hashida, Julia Drattell, Hannes Devos, Russell Gore, Robert Lynall, Julianne Schmidt
{"title":"脑震荡后驾驶:症状群和神经认知与脑震荡后驾驶表现的独特关系。","authors":"Kumiko Hashida, Julia Drattell, Hannes Devos, Russell Gore, Robert Lynall, Julianne Schmidt","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to identify clinical concussion assessment outcomes that uniquely capture simulated driving performance among acutely concussed individuals, relative to controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional design. Twenty-eight college students within 72 hours of concussion and 46 non-concussed controls participated in the study. We collected the following clinical concussion assessment outcomes: four concussion symptom clusters, seven computerized neurocognitive domain scores, Standardized Assessment of Concussion total score, Balance Error Scoring System total score, and tandem gait completion time. The following simulated driving outcomes were included (count): total collisions, speed exceedances, centerline crossings, and road edge excursions. We used separate generalized linear mixed regression models fit using a Poisson distribution with group, assessment, and interaction effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher migrainous symptoms ( P < 0.001), cognitive-fatigue symptoms ( P = 0.041), poorer visual memory ( P = 0.015), and slower reaction time ( P = 0.023) in concussion group were associated with higher risk of committing speed exceedances, relative to controls. Conversely, better performance on the continuous performance test ( P = 0.046) and Standardized Assessment of Concussion ( P = 0.045) in concussion group was associated with higher risk of committing speed exceedances relative to controls. Poorer performance on psychomotor speed ( P = 0.001), reaction time ( P = 0.031), cognitive flexibility ( P = 0.004), and executive function ( P = 0.003) was associated with higher risk of committing centerline crossings in concussion group, relative to controls. Conversely, better performance on the continuous performance test ( P = 0.035) and higher affective symptoms ( P = 0.013) were associated with higher risk of committing centerline crossings and road edge excursions, respectively, relative to controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results highlight key symptom clusters and computerized neurocognitive outcomes that uniquely inform poorer simulated driving performance in acutely concussed individuals. Symptom clusters and computerized neurocognitive function might be helpful when discussing with patients about return to driving decisions post-concussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":"912-920"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Driving after Concussion: Symptom Clusters and Neurocognition Uniquely Relate to Post-concussion Driving Performance.\",\"authors\":\"Kumiko Hashida, Julia Drattell, Hannes Devos, Russell Gore, Robert Lynall, Julianne Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to identify clinical concussion assessment outcomes that uniquely capture simulated driving performance among acutely concussed individuals, relative to controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional design. Twenty-eight college students within 72 hours of concussion and 46 non-concussed controls participated in the study. We collected the following clinical concussion assessment outcomes: four concussion symptom clusters, seven computerized neurocognitive domain scores, Standardized Assessment of Concussion total score, Balance Error Scoring System total score, and tandem gait completion time. The following simulated driving outcomes were included (count): total collisions, speed exceedances, centerline crossings, and road edge excursions. We used separate generalized linear mixed regression models fit using a Poisson distribution with group, assessment, and interaction effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher migrainous symptoms ( P < 0.001), cognitive-fatigue symptoms ( P = 0.041), poorer visual memory ( P = 0.015), and slower reaction time ( P = 0.023) in concussion group were associated with higher risk of committing speed exceedances, relative to controls. Conversely, better performance on the continuous performance test ( P = 0.046) and Standardized Assessment of Concussion ( P = 0.045) in concussion group was associated with higher risk of committing speed exceedances relative to controls. Poorer performance on psychomotor speed ( P = 0.001), reaction time ( P = 0.031), cognitive flexibility ( P = 0.004), and executive function ( P = 0.003) was associated with higher risk of committing centerline crossings in concussion group, relative to controls. Conversely, better performance on the continuous performance test ( P = 0.035) and higher affective symptoms ( P = 0.013) were associated with higher risk of committing centerline crossings and road edge excursions, respectively, relative to controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results highlight key symptom clusters and computerized neurocognitive outcomes that uniquely inform poorer simulated driving performance in acutely concussed individuals. Symptom clusters and computerized neurocognitive function might be helpful when discussing with patients about return to driving decisions post-concussion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"912-920\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003623\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定临床脑震荡评估结果,独特地捕捉急性脑震荡个体的模拟驾驶表现,相对于对照组。方法:横断面设计。28名脑震荡后72小时内的大学生和46名未脑震荡的对照组参加了这项研究。我们收集了以下临床脑震荡评估结果:4个脑震荡症状集群,7个计算机化神经认知领域评分,脑震荡标准化评估(SAC)总分,平衡误差评分系统总分和串联步态完成时间。以下模拟驾驶结果包括(计数):总碰撞、超速、中心线过线和道路边缘偏移。我们使用单独的广义线性混合回归模型,使用泊松分布拟合群体、评估和相互作用效应。结果:与对照组相比,脑震荡组的偏头痛症状(p < 0.001)、认知疲劳症状(p = 0.041)、视觉记忆较差(p = 0.015)和反应时间较慢(p = 0.023)与超速的风险较高相关。相反,与对照组相比,脑震荡组在连续性能测试(p = 0.046)和SAC (p = 0.045)上的更好表现与更高的超速风险相关。与对照组相比,脑震荡组在精神运动速度(p = 0.001)、反应时间(p = 0.031)、认知灵活性(p = 0.004)和执行功能(p = 0.003)方面的较差表现与较高的越过中心线的风险相关。相反,连续表现测试中较好的表现(p = 0.035)和较高的情感症状(p = 0.013)分别与较高的穿越中心线和道路边缘的风险相关。相对于控件。结论:我们的研究结果强调了关键症状群和计算机化的神经认知结果,这些结果独特地告知了急性脑震荡患者较差的模拟驾驶表现。症状群和计算机化的神经认知功能可能有助于与患者讨论脑震荡后恢复驾驶的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Driving after Concussion: Symptom Clusters and Neurocognition Uniquely Relate to Post-concussion Driving Performance.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify clinical concussion assessment outcomes that uniquely capture simulated driving performance among acutely concussed individuals, relative to controls.

Methods: Cross-sectional design. Twenty-eight college students within 72 hours of concussion and 46 non-concussed controls participated in the study. We collected the following clinical concussion assessment outcomes: four concussion symptom clusters, seven computerized neurocognitive domain scores, Standardized Assessment of Concussion total score, Balance Error Scoring System total score, and tandem gait completion time. The following simulated driving outcomes were included (count): total collisions, speed exceedances, centerline crossings, and road edge excursions. We used separate generalized linear mixed regression models fit using a Poisson distribution with group, assessment, and interaction effects.

Results: Higher migrainous symptoms ( P < 0.001), cognitive-fatigue symptoms ( P = 0.041), poorer visual memory ( P = 0.015), and slower reaction time ( P = 0.023) in concussion group were associated with higher risk of committing speed exceedances, relative to controls. Conversely, better performance on the continuous performance test ( P = 0.046) and Standardized Assessment of Concussion ( P = 0.045) in concussion group was associated with higher risk of committing speed exceedances relative to controls. Poorer performance on psychomotor speed ( P = 0.001), reaction time ( P = 0.031), cognitive flexibility ( P = 0.004), and executive function ( P = 0.003) was associated with higher risk of committing centerline crossings in concussion group, relative to controls. Conversely, better performance on the continuous performance test ( P = 0.035) and higher affective symptoms ( P = 0.013) were associated with higher risk of committing centerline crossings and road edge excursions, respectively, relative to controls.

Conclusions: Our results highlight key symptom clusters and computerized neurocognitive outcomes that uniquely inform poorer simulated driving performance in acutely concussed individuals. Symptom clusters and computerized neurocognitive function might be helpful when discussing with patients about return to driving decisions post-concussion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信