基于机器学习的光谱建模:增强美学的仿生指南。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
L J Herrera, R Ghinea, M M Perez, R D Paravina
{"title":"基于机器学习的光谱建模:增强美学的仿生指南。","authors":"L J Herrera, R Ghinea, M M Perez, R D Paravina","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide guidelines and means for optimal coverage and distribution of computer models with 1-10 clusters, designed based on an in vivo extensive dental colorimetric database and compare the findings with some reputable shade guides.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) algorithm was used to optimize the tab position in the CIELAB color space, while MATLAB Fuzzy Logic was used to implement the codes. A minimization process was performed to fine-tune the cluster centers, minimizing Coverage Error (CE<sub>00</sub>) and Maximum Error (ME<sub>00</sub>). Spectral reconstruction was performed, and the results were compared with the corresponding data for VITA classical A1-D4 (VC), Linearguide 3D-Master (LG), and Bleachedguide 3D-Master (BG) shade guide. Paired t-test was employed to assess the significance of CE<sub>00</sub> differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CE<sub>00</sub> and ME<sub>00</sub> ranges for 1-to-10-tab models were 3.8 (14.2) to 1.7 (4.3), while the corresponding values for shade guides were 3.1 (9.1) for VC, 2.3 (6.0) for LG, and 2.9 (9.3) for BG. Hence, the 4-tab-model with CE<sub>00</sub> of 2.2 and ME<sub>00</sub> of 7.1, outperformed CE<sub>00</sub> of LG (the lowest/best CE<sub>00</sub> among shade guides), while the 6-tab-model, with CE<sub>00</sub> of 2.0 and ME<sub>00</sub> of 5.6, outperformed its ME<sub>00</sub>. A paired t-test confirmed that increasing the number of tabs models resulted in significant CE improvement in all cases (p ≤ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shade guide models with only 4 to 6 tabs, optimized using computational techniques, outperformed physical dental shade guides tested, exhibiting significantly lower (better) Coverage Error and Maximum Error.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Given that the spectral modeling was performed on an extensive in vivo database of natural teeth, this approach was validated as a biomimetic guide for shade guides and corresponding materials of the future, offering a possibility for better shade matching with fewer shades/shade tabs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine-Learning-Based Spectral Modeling: A Biomimetic Guide for Enhancing Esthetics.\",\"authors\":\"L J Herrera, R Ghinea, M M Perez, R D Paravina\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.13380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide guidelines and means for optimal coverage and distribution of computer models with 1-10 clusters, designed based on an in vivo extensive dental colorimetric database and compare the findings with some reputable shade guides.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) algorithm was used to optimize the tab position in the CIELAB color space, while MATLAB Fuzzy Logic was used to implement the codes. A minimization process was performed to fine-tune the cluster centers, minimizing Coverage Error (CE<sub>00</sub>) and Maximum Error (ME<sub>00</sub>). Spectral reconstruction was performed, and the results were compared with the corresponding data for VITA classical A1-D4 (VC), Linearguide 3D-Master (LG), and Bleachedguide 3D-Master (BG) shade guide. Paired t-test was employed to assess the significance of CE<sub>00</sub> differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CE<sub>00</sub> and ME<sub>00</sub> ranges for 1-to-10-tab models were 3.8 (14.2) to 1.7 (4.3), while the corresponding values for shade guides were 3.1 (9.1) for VC, 2.3 (6.0) for LG, and 2.9 (9.3) for BG. Hence, the 4-tab-model with CE<sub>00</sub> of 2.2 and ME<sub>00</sub> of 7.1, outperformed CE<sub>00</sub> of LG (the lowest/best CE<sub>00</sub> among shade guides), while the 6-tab-model, with CE<sub>00</sub> of 2.0 and ME<sub>00</sub> of 5.6, outperformed its ME<sub>00</sub>. A paired t-test confirmed that increasing the number of tabs models resulted in significant CE improvement in all cases (p ≤ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shade guide models with only 4 to 6 tabs, optimized using computational techniques, outperformed physical dental shade guides tested, exhibiting significantly lower (better) Coverage Error and Maximum Error.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Given that the spectral modeling was performed on an extensive in vivo database of natural teeth, this approach was validated as a biomimetic guide for shade guides and corresponding materials of the future, offering a possibility for better shade matching with fewer shades/shade tabs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13380\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为基于体内广泛的牙齿比色数据库设计的1-10个群集的计算机模型的最佳覆盖和分布提供指导和方法,并将结果与一些知名的色度指南进行比较。材料与方法:采用模糊c均值(Fuzzy C-Means, FCM)算法对CIELAB色彩空间中的标签位置进行优化,利用MATLAB模糊逻辑实现代码。执行最小化过程以微调群集中心,最小化覆盖误差(CE00)和最大误差(ME00)。进行光谱重建,并将结果与VITA classic A1-D4 (VC)、Linearguide 3D-Master (LG)、Bleachedguide 3D-Master (BG)阴影指南的相应数据进行比较。采用配对t检验评估CE00差异的显著性。结果:1- 10标签模型的CE00和ME00范围为3.8(14.2)至1.7(4.3),而遮荫指南的对应值为VC的3.1 (9.1),LG的2.3(6.0)和BG的2.9(9.3)。因此,CE00为2.2,ME00为7.1的4标签型号优于LG的CE00(遮光指南中最低/最好的CE00),而CE00为2.0,ME00为5.6的6标签型号优于其ME00。配对t检验证实,增加标签模型数量导致所有病例CE显著改善(p≤0.05)。结论:使用计算技术优化后的4 - 6个标签的遮光导板模型优于物理牙科遮光导板,具有更低(更好)的覆盖误差和最大误差。临床意义:考虑到光谱建模是在广泛的天然牙齿体内数据库上进行的,该方法被验证为未来阴影指南和相应材料的仿生指南,为更少的阴影/阴影标签提供了更好的阴影匹配的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine-Learning-Based Spectral Modeling: A Biomimetic Guide for Enhancing Esthetics.

Objective: To provide guidelines and means for optimal coverage and distribution of computer models with 1-10 clusters, designed based on an in vivo extensive dental colorimetric database and compare the findings with some reputable shade guides.

Materials and methods: The Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) algorithm was used to optimize the tab position in the CIELAB color space, while MATLAB Fuzzy Logic was used to implement the codes. A minimization process was performed to fine-tune the cluster centers, minimizing Coverage Error (CE00) and Maximum Error (ME00). Spectral reconstruction was performed, and the results were compared with the corresponding data for VITA classical A1-D4 (VC), Linearguide 3D-Master (LG), and Bleachedguide 3D-Master (BG) shade guide. Paired t-test was employed to assess the significance of CE00 differences.

Results: CE00 and ME00 ranges for 1-to-10-tab models were 3.8 (14.2) to 1.7 (4.3), while the corresponding values for shade guides were 3.1 (9.1) for VC, 2.3 (6.0) for LG, and 2.9 (9.3) for BG. Hence, the 4-tab-model with CE00 of 2.2 and ME00 of 7.1, outperformed CE00 of LG (the lowest/best CE00 among shade guides), while the 6-tab-model, with CE00 of 2.0 and ME00 of 5.6, outperformed its ME00. A paired t-test confirmed that increasing the number of tabs models resulted in significant CE improvement in all cases (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusions: Shade guide models with only 4 to 6 tabs, optimized using computational techniques, outperformed physical dental shade guides tested, exhibiting significantly lower (better) Coverage Error and Maximum Error.

Clinical significance: Given that the spectral modeling was performed on an extensive in vivo database of natural teeth, this approach was validated as a biomimetic guide for shade guides and corresponding materials of the future, offering a possibility for better shade matching with fewer shades/shade tabs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信