无症状2型糖尿病成人冠状动脉微血管功能的性别差异和决定因素

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jian L Yeo, Abhishek Dattani, Joanna M Bilak, Alice L Wood, Lavanya Athithan, Aparna Deshpande, Anvesha Singh, J Ranjit Arnold, Emer M Brady, David Adlam, John D Biglands, Peter Kellman, Hui Xue, Thomas Yates, Melanie J Davies, Gaurav S Gulsin, Gerry P McCann
{"title":"无症状2型糖尿病成人冠状动脉微血管功能的性别差异和决定因素","authors":"Jian L Yeo, Abhishek Dattani, Joanna M Bilak, Alice L Wood, Lavanya Athithan, Aparna Deshpande, Anvesha Singh, J Ranjit Arnold, Emer M Brady, David Adlam, John D Biglands, Peter Kellman, Hui Xue, Thomas Yates, Melanie J Davies, Gaurav S Gulsin, Gerry P McCann","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a significant complication in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and may be more common in women. We aimed to evaluate the sex differences and sex-specific clinical determinants of CMD in adults with T2D without prevalent cardiovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single center pooled analysis of four prospective studies comparing asymptomatic people with T2D and controls. All subjects underwent comprehensive cardiovascular phenotyping with myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) quantified with perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Participants with silent coronary disease were excluded. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify determinants of MPR with an interaction term for sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and seventy-nine T2D (age 57 ± 11 years, 42% [202/479] women) were compared with 116 controls (age 53 ± 11 years, 41% [48/116] women). Men with T2D, but not women, demonstrated worse systolic function and higher extracellular volume fraction than controls. MPR was significantly lower in T2D than controls (women, 2.6 ± 0.9 vs 3.3 ± 1.0, p < 0.001; men, 3.1 ± 0.9 vs 3.5 ± 1.0, p = 0.004), and lower in women than men with T2D (p < 0.001). More women than men with T2D had MPR <2.5 (46% [79/202] vs 26% [64/277], p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between sex and body mass index (BMI) for MPR (p interaction <0.001). Following adjustment for clinical risk factors, inverse association with MPR were BMI in women (β = -0.17, p = 0.045) and systolic blood pressure in men (β = -0.14, p = 0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among asymptomatic adults with T2D, women had a greater prevalence of CMD than men. Risk factors modestly but significantly associated with CMD in asymptomatic people with T2D were BMI among women and systolic blood pressure among men.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":" ","pages":"101132"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences and determinants of coronary microvascular function in asymptomatic adults with type 2 diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Jian L Yeo, Abhishek Dattani, Joanna M Bilak, Alice L Wood, Lavanya Athithan, Aparna Deshpande, Anvesha Singh, J Ranjit Arnold, Emer M Brady, David Adlam, John D Biglands, Peter Kellman, Hui Xue, Thomas Yates, Melanie J Davies, Gaurav S Gulsin, Gerry P McCann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a significant complication in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and may be more common in women. We aimed to evaluate the sex differences and sex-specific clinical determinants of CMD in adults with T2D without prevalent cardiovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single center pooled analysis of four prospective studies comparing asymptomatic people with T2D and controls. All subjects underwent comprehensive cardiovascular phenotyping with myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) quantified with perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Participants with silent coronary disease were excluded. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify determinants of MPR with an interaction term for sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and seventy-nine T2D (age 57 ± 11 years, 42% [202/479] women) were compared with 116 controls (age 53 ± 11 years, 41% [48/116] women). Men with T2D, but not women, demonstrated worse systolic function and higher extracellular volume fraction than controls. MPR was significantly lower in T2D than controls (women, 2.6 ± 0.9 vs 3.3 ± 1.0, p < 0.001; men, 3.1 ± 0.9 vs 3.5 ± 1.0, p = 0.004), and lower in women than men with T2D (p < 0.001). More women than men with T2D had MPR <2.5 (46% [79/202] vs 26% [64/277], p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between sex and body mass index (BMI) for MPR (p interaction <0.001). Following adjustment for clinical risk factors, inverse association with MPR were BMI in women (β = -0.17, p = 0.045) and systolic blood pressure in men (β = -0.14, p = 0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among asymptomatic adults with T2D, women had a greater prevalence of CMD than men. Risk factors modestly but significantly associated with CMD in asymptomatic people with T2D were BMI among women and systolic blood pressure among men.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761338/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101132\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101132","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)是2型糖尿病(T2D)的重要并发症,可能在女性中更为常见。我们的目的是评估没有流行心血管疾病的成年T2D患者CMD的性别差异和性别特异性临床决定因素。方法:对四项前瞻性研究进行单中心汇总分析,比较无症状T2D患者和对照组。所有受试者都进行了全面的心血管表型分析,心肌灌注储备(MPR)用灌注MRI量化。排除无症状冠状动脉疾病的参与者。进行多变量线性回归以确定MPR的决定因素与性别的相互作用项。结果:479例T2D患者(年龄57±11y,女性42%)与116例对照(年龄53±11y,女性41%)。与对照组相比,男性T2D患者表现出更差的收缩功能和更高的细胞外体积分数,而女性没有。T2D患者的MPR明显低于对照组(女性,2.6±0.9 vs 3.3±1.0,p)。结论:在无症状T2D成人中,女性的CMD患病率高于男性。与无症状T2D患者冠状动脉微血管功能障碍相关的危险因素是女性的BMI和男性的收缩压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex differences and determinants of coronary microvascular function in asymptomatic adults with type 2 diabetes.

Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a significant complication in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and may be more common in women. We aimed to evaluate the sex differences and sex-specific clinical determinants of CMD in adults with T2D without prevalent cardiovascular disease.

Methods: Single center pooled analysis of four prospective studies comparing asymptomatic people with T2D and controls. All subjects underwent comprehensive cardiovascular phenotyping with myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) quantified with perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Participants with silent coronary disease were excluded. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify determinants of MPR with an interaction term for sex.

Results: Four hundred and seventy-nine T2D (age 57 ± 11 years, 42% [202/479] women) were compared with 116 controls (age 53 ± 11 years, 41% [48/116] women). Men with T2D, but not women, demonstrated worse systolic function and higher extracellular volume fraction than controls. MPR was significantly lower in T2D than controls (women, 2.6 ± 0.9 vs 3.3 ± 1.0, p < 0.001; men, 3.1 ± 0.9 vs 3.5 ± 1.0, p = 0.004), and lower in women than men with T2D (p < 0.001). More women than men with T2D had MPR <2.5 (46% [79/202] vs 26% [64/277], p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between sex and body mass index (BMI) for MPR (p interaction <0.001). Following adjustment for clinical risk factors, inverse association with MPR were BMI in women (β = -0.17, p = 0.045) and systolic blood pressure in men (β = -0.14, p = 0.049).

Conclusion: Among asymptomatic adults with T2D, women had a greater prevalence of CMD than men. Risk factors modestly but significantly associated with CMD in asymptomatic people with T2D were BMI among women and systolic blood pressure among men.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system. New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis. Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR. Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信